Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?
Tóm tắt
We implement a risk experiment that allows for judgment errors to investigate who makes mistakes and whether it matters. The experiments are conducted with a random sample of the adult population in Rwanda, and data on financial decisions are collected. We find a high proportion of inconsistent choices, with over 50% of the participants making at least one mistake. Importantly, errors are informative. While risk aversion alone does not explain financial decisions, risk aversion and inconsistent choices interact in significant and sensible ways. As we would expect, risk-averse individuals are more likely to belong to a savings group and less likely to take out an informal loan. For those more likely to make mistakes, however, as they become more risk averse, they are less likely to belong to a savings group and more likely to take up informal credit, suggesting that mistakes correlate with less than optimal behavior.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics, 9(4), 383–405.
Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., & Yin, W. (2006). Tying Odysseus to the mast: evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 673–697.
Bellemare, C., & Shearer, B. (2006). Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: evidence from a field experiment. IZA Working Paper No. 2227.
Benjamin, D., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Working Paper, University of Chicago.
Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395–407.
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital–labor–production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1–3), 7–42.
Carbone, E., & Hey, J. (2000). Which error story is best? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 161–176.
Castillo, M., Ferraro, P., Jordan, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). The today and tomorrow of kids. Working Paper, Georgia State University.
Chakravarti, D., Krish, R., Paul, P., & Srivastava, J. (2002). Partitioned presentation of multicomponent bundle prices: evaluation, choice and underlying processing effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 215–229.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. IZA Working Paper No. 1730.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2007). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? IZA Discussion Paper No. 2735.
Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C., Montmarquette, C., & Rojas, C. (2007). Debt aversion and the demand for loans for postsecondary education. Public Finance Review, 35(2), 233–262.
Harless, D. W., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62(6), 1251–1289.
Harrison, G., List, J., & Towe, C. (2007). Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: a case study of risk aversion. Econometrica, 75(2), 433–458.
Harrison, G., & Rutström, E. (2007). Risk aversion in the laboratory. Working Paper 07-03, Department of Economics, University of Central Florida.
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482.
Hey, J. (2005). Why we should not be silent about noise. Experimental Economics, 8(4), 325–345.
Hey, J., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalisations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.
Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76, 508–515.
Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2006). Further reflections on prospect theory. Working Paper, Georgia State University.
Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2001). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and differences in aggregated and segregated evaluation of lottery portfolios. Management Science, 47(5), 716–733.
Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., & Sugden, R. (2002). A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(2), 103–130.
Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2007). Impatience and credit behavior: evidence from a field experiment. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper Series, No. 07-3.
Petrie, R. (2002). Rwanda credit unions member & non-member survey 2002. World Council of Credit Unions, Research Monograph Series, No. 20.
Ortmann, A., & Hertwig, R. (2006). Monetary incentives: usually neither necessary nor sufficient? CERGE-EI Working Paper 307, Prague.
Prasad, K., & Salmon, T. C. (2007). Self selection and market power in risk sharing contracts. Working Paper, Florida State University.
Segal, C. (2006). Misbehavior, education, and labor market outcomes. Working Paper, Universidad Pompeu Fabre.
Stockman, C. (2006). Differences and similarities in health risk preferences across two subject cohorts. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh.
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2007). Risk and time preferences: experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Working Paper, California Institute of Technology.
Westen, D. (1996). Psychology: mind, brain and culture. New York: Wiley.