Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research
Tóm tắt
Scholars have acknowledged the need to anchor scientific knowledge about social and psychological processes in the norms, values, and experiences of the partticular population under study. This article describes how focus groups can be incorporated into the planning stages of a research pogram to facilitate these goals. After a brief overview of teh central components of focus group research, and example from a program of research involving dual-earner African American families is used to as an illustration. The article describes how (a) the identification of cultural knowledge and (b)access to the language participants use to think and talk about a topic can help researchers formulate a conceptual framework, identify important constructs, and develop appropriate instruments for assessing constructs. Some strengths and limitations of focus group research are discussed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alderfer, C., Alderfer, C., Tucker, L., & Tucker, S. (1980). Diagnosing race problems in management.Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 16, 135–166.
Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An under-utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in Health Education.Health Education Quarterly, 14, 411–448.
Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1982).Concephialization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Boykin, A. W. (1979). Black psychology and the research process: Keeping the baby but throwing out the bath water. In A. W. Boykin, A. J. Franklin, & J. F. Yates (Eds.),Research directions of Black psychologists (pp. 85–103). New York: Russell Sage.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, (1991). The narrative construction of reality.Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.
Crosby, F. J. (1987).Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Davis, G., & Watson, G. (1982).Black life in Corporate America. New York: Doubleday.
de Vries, H., Weijts, W., Dijkstra, M., & Kok, G. (1992). The utilization of qualitative and quantitative data for health education program planning, implementation, and evaluation: A spiral approach.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 101–115.
Gottlieb, N. H., Lovato, C. Y., Weinstein, R., Green, L. W., & Eriksen, M. P. (1992). The implementation of a restrictive worksite smoking policy in a large decentralized organization.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 77–100.
Hecht, M. L., Collier, M. J., & Ribeau, S. A. (1993).African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Howard, G. S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy.American Psychologist, 46, 187–197.
Howard, A., & Scott, R. A. (1981). The study of minority groups in complex societies. In R. H. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, & B. B. Whiting (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 113–152). New York: Guilford.
Hugentobler, M. K., Israel, B. A., Schurman, S. J. (1992). An action research approach to workplace health: Integrating methods.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 55–76.
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response styles.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.
Joseph, J. G., Emmors, CA., Kessler, R. C., Wortman, C. B., O'Brien, K., Hockev, W. T., Schaefer, C. (1984). Coping with the threat of AIDS. An approach to psychosocial assessment.American Psychologist, 39, 1297–1302.
Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kohn, M. L. (1969).Class and conformity. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Kohn, M. L. & Schooler, C. (1973). Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects.American Sociological Review, 38, 97–118.
Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1978). The reciprocal effects of substantive complexity of work on intellectual flexibility: A longitudinal assessment.American Journal of Sociology, 84, 24–52.
Krippendorf, K. (1980).Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Krueger, R. A. (1988).Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kreckel, M. (1981).Communicative acts and shared knowledge in natural discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Lengua, L. J., Roosa, M. W., Schupak-Newbery, E., Micheals, M. L., Berg, G. N., & Weschler, L. F. (1992). Using focus groups to guide the development of a parenting program for difficult-to-reach, high risk families.Family Relations, 41, 163–168.
Mair, M. (1988). Psychology as storytelling.International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 1, 125–138.
Marsella, A. J., & Kameoka, V. A. (1989). Ethnocultural issues in the assessment of psychopathology. In S. Wetzler (Ed.),Measuring mental illness: Psychometric assessment for clinicians (pp. 231–255). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
McAdoo, H. P. (1982). Patterns of upward mobility in Black families. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.),Black families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mohler, P. P., & Zull, C. (1984).TEXTPACK Version V. Release 2. Mannheim: ZUMA.
Morgan, D. L. (1988).Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, D. L. (1989). Adjusting to widowhood: Do social networks really make it easier?Gerontologist, 29, 101–107.
Morgan, D. L. (1993).Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research.Qualitative Sociology, 7, 253–270.
O'Brien, K. O. (1993). Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105–117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Piotrkowski, C. S. (1979).Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lower-middle-class families. New York: The Free Press.
Plas, J. M. (1986).Systems psychology in the schools. New York: Pergamon.
Polanyi, L. (1985).Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Popko, E. S. (1980).Key-word-in-context bibliographic indexing: Release 4.0 users manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis.
Pramualratana, A., Havanon, N., & Knodel, J. (1985). Exploring the normative age at marriage in Thailand. An example from focus group research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 203–210.
Quinn, R. P., & Staines, G. L. (1979).The 1977 quality of employment survey: Descriptive statistics with comparison data from 1969–70 and 1972–73 surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Seidel, J. V., Kjolseth, R., & Seymour, E. (1988).The ethnograph: A user's guide. Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
Shweder, R. A., & LeVine, R. A. (1984).Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart. D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990).Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Voydanoff, P. (1980). Work roles as stressors in corporate families.Family Relations, 29, 489–494.
Weber, R. P. (1985).Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wolff, B., Knodel, J., & Sittitrai, W. (1993). Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods: A case example. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 118–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Work, J. (1980). Management blacks and the international labor market: Answers to a questionnaire.Human Resource Management (Fall), 16–22.