Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders - Tập 23 - Trang 1-15 - 2022
Daniel P. Berthold1,2, Lukas N. Muench1, Felix Dyrna3, Augustus D. Mazzocca4, Patrick Garvin4, Andreas Voss5, Bastian Scheiderer1, Sebastian Siebenlist1, Andreas B. Imhoff1, Knut Beitzel6
1Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
3Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Munich, Germany.
4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
5Department of Trauma Surgery, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
6Arthroscopy and Orthopedic Sportsmedicine, ATOS Orthoparc Clinic, Cologne, Germany

Tóm tắt

There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability. Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.

Tài liệu tham khảo