Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders

Management Science - Tập 49 Số 4 - Trang 497-513 - 2003
Tanya Menon1, Jeffrey Pfeffer2
1Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1101 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
2Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5015

Tóm tắt

This paper compares how managers value knowledge from internal and external sources. Although many theories account for favoritism toward insiders, we find that preferences for knowledge obtained from outsiders are also prevalent. Two complementary case studies and survey data from managers demonstrate the phenomenon of valuing external knowledge more highly than internal knowledge and reveal some mechanisms through which this process occurs. We found evidence that the preference for outsider knowledge is the result of managerial responses to (1) the contrasting status implications of learning from internal versus external competitors, and (2) the availability or scarcity of knowledge-internal knowledge is more readily available and hence subject to greater scrutiny, while external knowledge is more scarce, which makes it appear more special and unique. We conclude by considering some consequences of the external knowledge preference for organizational functioning.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.5465/amr.1996.9602161572

Abrams D., 1990, Social Identity Theory. Constructive and Critical Advances

10.2307/2393475

Athos A. G., 1981, The Art of Japanese Management

10.1177/014920639101700108

Berscheid E., 1969, Interpersonal Attraction

Blau P. M., 1955, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy

10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307

Brewer M. B., 1998, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 554

Burrows P., 2000, Business Week, 3692, 102

10.4159/9780674029095

Cialdini R. B., 2001, Influence

10.2307/2393553

Cyert R. M., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm

10.1002/smj.4250090204

10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750

10.2307/2393275

Deming W. E., 1986, Out of the Crisis

10.2307/258557

10.2307/3707362

Glaser B. G., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research

Goodman P. S., 1996, Acad. Management Executive, 10, 7

10.2307/2667030

10.2307/2667032

Haspeslagh P. C., 1991, Managing Acquisitions

10.2307/2393337

10.2307/2393338

Hirsch P., 1988, Across the Board, 25, 14

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<75::AID-SMJ922>3.3.CO;2-Y

Jacobson G., 1986, Xerox, American Samurai

10.2307/1251854

10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x

10.1006/obhd.1997.2746

Marques J. M., 1998, Social Identity: International Perspectives, 124

Miles M. B., 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods

Mizruchi M. S., 1992, The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Inter-firm Relationships and Their Consequences

Morison E., 1966, Men, Machines, and Modern Times

10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1

10.2307/1251757

10.1016/0030-5073(84)90038-2

10.2307/256097

Pascale R., 1990, Managing on the Edge

Pfeffer J., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective

Ravenscraft D. J., 1987, Mergers, Sell-Offs, and Economic Efficiency

10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.832

Salancik G. R., 1982, Readings in the Management of Innovation

Shukla M., 1997, Competing Through Knowledge

Smith D. K., 1988, Fumbling the Future

10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1958.tb01580.x

10.1002/smj.4250171105

Tajfel H., 1986, Psychology of Intergroup Relations

10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1161

10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.49

10.2307/255842

10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429

10.1002/smj.4250050207

10.1111/0022-4537.00132