The Effects of EFL Teachers’ Gender and Experience on Interaction Patterns in Undergraduate Content Classes
Tóm tắt
Teacher-student interactions have been extensively explored in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms using the tripartite Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) model. Past research concentrates mainly on the exploration of interactions in classrooms where language skills and components are taught. However, the analysis of IRF exchanges in EFL content courses is under-researched. The present study, therefore, was designed to explore IRF interactions in these types of EFL classes. The main purpose was to describe student-teacher interactions in these classes and explore the possible effects of teachers’ gender and teaching experience on IRF use. The participants included a group of seven EFL teachers and 25 undergraduate EFL learners studying English Literature and Translation Studies at the University of Kashan, Iran. The researchers recorded 26 90-min content classes through participant observation. Guided by expert opinion, the researchers purposively selected and transcribed 390 min of the recorded exchanges and then coded them using the Sinclair and Coulthard Model. The analysis of exchange types and frequencies indicated that the student’s reply act, the teacher’s elicitation act, and the teacher’s accept act were the most frequently observed classroom interactions. However, teachers’ starters and asides were not observed at all. At the level of interactional moves, the opening move by the teacher and the answering move by the students were the most frequent. Results also showed that student initiation addressed to the teacher was observed more frequently in classes taught by teachers with average teaching experience (10–20 years) than those taught by a novice (below 10 years) or more experienced teachers (+ 20 years). Teachers’ gender did not significantly influence their interaction patterns with students. Implications for teaching EFL content courses are discussed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alpert, B. (1991). Students’ resistance in the classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22(4), 350–366.
Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hymen, R. T., & Smith, F. L., Jr. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Canada, K., & Pringle, R. (1995). The role of gender in college classroom interactions: a social context approach. Sociology of Education, 68(3), 161–186.
Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc..
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435–446.
Christie, F. (2002). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. Schleppegrell & C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power (pp. 45–66). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Donato, R., & Brooks, F. B. (2004). Literary discussions and advanced speaking functions: researching the (dis)connection. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 183–199.
Drudy, S., & Chathain, M. Ú. (2002). Gender effects in classroom interaction: data collection, self-analysis and reflection. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 34–50.
Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45(9–10), 579–593.
Edwards, A., & Westgate, D. P. G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. London: Falmer Press.
Fadilah, E. (2018). Rethinking the maintenance of CLT in Indonesia: a response to Ariatna’s “The need for maintaining CLT in Indonesia”. TESOL Journal, 9(1), 224–236.
Fagan, D. S. (2018). Addressing learner hesitancy-to-respond within initiation-response-feedback sequences. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 425–435.
Hall, J. K. (2010). Interaction as method and result of language learning. Language Teaching, 43(2), 202–215.
Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186–203.
Hellermann, J. (2007). The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 83–96.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ho, D. (2006). Classroom talk: exploring the sociocultural structure of formal ESL learning. Bern: Peter Lang AG.
House, N. E. (1997). Teaching art history to adult students: a teaching model and pilot study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Ohio State University, USA.
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (1998). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. UK: Blackwell. Longman dictionary of American English (2nd ed.). (2000). London: Pearson.
Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443–471.
Lemke, L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259–278.
Lucero, E., & Rouse, M. (2017). Classroom interaction in ELTE undergraduate programs: characteristics and pedagogical implications. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(2), 193–208.
Luk, J. C. M. (2017). Classroom Discourse and the Construction of Learner and Teacher Identities. Discourse and Education. In S. Wortham, D. Kim and S. May. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 173-184.
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mehan, H. (1998). The study of social interaction in educational settings: accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development, 41(4), 245–269.
Mercer, N. (1992). Talk for teaching and learning. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 215–223). London: Hodder and Stoughton for the National Curriculum Council.
Mondada, L., & Doehler, S. P. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518.
Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nystrand, M. (1997). Dialogic instruction: when recitation becomes conversation. In M. Nystrand, A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, & C. Prendergast (Eds.), Opening dialogue: understanding the dynamics of language learning and teaching in the English classroom (pp. 1–29). New York: Teachers College Press.
Rashidi, N., & Rafiee Rad, M. (2010). Analyzing patterns of classroom interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(3), 93–120.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sundari, H., Rafli, Z., & Ridwan, S. (2017). Interaction patterns in English as foreign language classroom at lower secondary schools. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 99–108.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley: Newbury House.
Thoms, J. (2011). Researching the (dis)connection between literary discussions and speaking functions: a replication with intermediate learners. In A. Cortazar & R. Orozco (Eds.), New approaches to Hispanic linguistic, literary, and cultural studies (pp. 315–345). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Thoms, J. (2012). Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: a review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s8–s27.
Tsouroufli, M. (2002). Gender and teachers’ classroom practice in a secondary school in Greece. Gender and Education, 14(2), 135–147.
Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 78(4), 245–260.
Vongsila, V., & Reinders, H. (2016). Making Asian learners talk: encouraging willingness to communicate. RELC Journal, 47(3), 331–347.
Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): a single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824.
Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1–37.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.