The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management*

Contemporary Accounting Research - Tập 15 Số 1 - Trang 1-24 - 1998
Connie L. Becker1, Mark L. DeFond2, James Jiambalvo1, K.R. Subramanyam2
1University of Washington
2University of Southern California

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis study examines the relation between audit quality and earnings management. Consistent with prior research, we treat audit quality as a dichotomous variable and assume that Big Six auditors are of higher quality than non‐Big Six auditors. Earnings management is captured by discretionary accruals that are estimated using a cross‐sectional version of the Jones 1991 model. Prior literature suggests that auditors are more likely to object to management's accounting choices that increase earnings (as opposed to decrease earnings) and that auditors are more likely to be sued when they are associated with financial statements that overstate earnings (as compared to understate earnings). Therefore, we hypothesize that clients of non‐Big Six auditors report discretionary accruals that increase income relatively more than the discretionary accruals reported by clients of Big Six auditors. This hypothesis is supported by evidence from a sample of 10,379 Big Six and 2,179 non‐Big Six firm years. Specifically, clients of non‐Big Six auditors report discretionary accruals that are, on average, 1.5‐2.1 percent of total assets higher than the discretionary accruals reported by clients of Big Six auditors. Also, consistent with earnings management, we find that the mean and median of the absolute value of discretionary accruals are greater for firms with non‐Big Six auditors. This result also indicates that lower audit quality is associated with more “accounting flexibility”.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Beneish M. D.1997.How do managers benefit from earnings overstatement? Working paper Indiana University.

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00481.x

10.1016/0165-4101(95)00404-1

10.1016/0165-4101(81)90011-2

10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3

10.1016/0165-4101(83)90012-5

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00893.x

10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DeAngelo L., 1986, Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: a study of management buyouts of public stockholders, Accounting Review, 61, 400

10.1016/0165-4101(88)90021-3

10.1016/0165-4101(94)90007-8

Dechow P., 1995, Detecting earnings management, Accounting Review, 70, 193

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x

DeFond M. L., 1992, The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 11, 16

DeFond M. L., 1991, Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors, Accounting Review, 66, 643

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00889.x

10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6

DeFond M. L. andK. R.Subramanyam.1997.Restrictions to accounting choice: Evidence from auditor realignment. Working paper University of Southern California.

10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00004-9

DeFond M. L. J.Francis andT. J.Wong.1997.Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation by Big Six and non‐Big Six accounting firms. Working paper Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Dopuch N., 1982, Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research, 401

10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7

Francis J. E. L.MaydewandH. C.Sparks.1996.Earnings management opportunities auditor quality and external monitoring. Working paper University of Missouri at Columbia.

10.2307/2491141

Francis J., 1988, Auditor changes: A test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation, Accounting Review, 64, 663

10.1016/0165-4101(79)90004-1

10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00449.x

10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00490.x

10.2307/2491047

Kinney W. R., 1994, Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit‐related adjustment studies, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13, 151

10.1086/260996

10.2307/2491176

10.2307/2490789

10.2307/2490395

10.2307/2490806

Palmrose Z., 1988, An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality, Accounting Review, 63, 55

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90042-3

Rubin M., 1988, Municipal audit fee determinants, Accounting Review, 63, 219

Schipper K., 1989, Commentary on earnings management, Accounting Horizons, 3, 91

Simon D., 1988, The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery, Accounting Review, 63, 255

Simunic D. A., 1987, Product differentiation in auditing: Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues

Pierre K., 1984, An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants, Accounting Review, 59, 242

10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00434-X

10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2

Teoh S. H. I.WelchandT. J.Wong.1996.Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Working paper Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Teoh S. H., 1993, Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient, Accounting Review, 68, 346

Watts R. L. andJ. L.Zimmerman.1980.The markets for independence and independent auditors. Unpublished manuscript University of Rochester.

10.1086/467051

Watts R. L., 1986, Positive accounting theory

Watts R. L., 1990, Positive accounting theory: A ten‐year perspective, Accounting Review, 65, 131

10.1016/0165-4101(94)00393-J

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Contemporary Accounting Research

Tập 15 Số 1

1-24

Thông tin tác giả