Megafruit and megafauna diversity are positively associated, while megafruit traits are related to abiotic factors, in tropical Asia

Global Ecology and Biogeography - Tập 31 Số 4 - Trang 740-752 - 2022
Kim R. McConkey1, Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz1,2, Richard T. Corlett3, Hosur Subbarao Sushma4, Lisa Ong1,2, Jedediah F. Brodie5
1School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia
2Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Center for Integrative Conservation, Xisuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China
3Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China
4Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON), Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore, India
5Division of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractAimFor tens of millions of years, herbivorous megafauna were abundant across the globe, fulfilling important ecological roles including seed dispersal. Megafruits are very large fruits that are dispersed most effectively by megafauna. However, megafruits also occur in ecosystems where megafauna are extinct or were never present, emphasizing our incomplete understanding of megafauna–megafruit relationships. Here we use the complex biogeography of tropical Asia to investigate how megafruit diversity and traits are associated with the diversity of megafauna, smaller animals, and abiotic factors.LocationTropical Asia, from the Indian subcontinent in the west to tropical China in the north to the Maluku archipelago (Indonesia) in the east.Time periodLate Pleistocene to the present day.Major taxa studiedMegafauna (body weight > 500 kg) that consume fruits, including stegodons, elephants, rhinoceroses, giant tapirs, and large bovids. Fleshy‐fruited plant species across the region with a fruit width > 40 mm (i.e., megafruits).MethodsWe compiled a list of all megafruits along with selected plant, fruit, and seed traits in 16 subregions across tropical Asia. We explored biogeographical patterns in megafruit diversity and traits in relation to the diversities of past and present megafauna, large‐ and medium‐sized animals and abiotic factors (mean temperature, mean precipitation, precipitation seasonality, insularity).ResultsWe identified 496 megafruits in tropical Asia. Megafruit diversity was highest in subregions with high megafaunal diversity, particularly extant species. Megafruit traits were influenced most strongly by abiotic factors (mainly temperature and land area), and weakly by megafauna and smaller dispersers.Main conclusionsOur results are consistent with megafauna maintaining or responding to megafruit diversity, but variation in megafruit traits is primarily associated with abiotic factors. Given the massive megafaunal losses in tropical Asia since the Late Pleistocene, it is important to identify fruit traits that can increase megafauna‐dependence and thus vulnerability to these losses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/nph.16750

10.3389/fevo.2019.00328

10.1038/nclimate1456

10.1073/pnas.1710172114

10.1093/biolinnean/blz109

10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014

10.1111/j.1744‐7429.2011.00784.x

10.1017/S0266467403003407

10.1111/boj.12385

10.1111/2041-210X.12420

10.1017/S0266467403003638

Cole T. C. H., 2019, Angiosperm phylogeny poster (APP) ‐ Flowering Plant Systematics, PeerJ Preprints, 7, e2320v6

10.1098/rstb.2019.0216

10.1111/geb.13065

10.1086/589888

10.1111/brv.12164

10.1002/ecy.2443

Faurby S. Pedersen R. Ø. Davis M. Schowanek S. D. Jarvie S. Antonelli A.&Svenning J. C.(2020).PHYLACINE 1.2.1: An update to the phylogenetic atlas of mammal macroecology. Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3690867

10.1111/brv.12374

10.1016/j.ympev.2017.06.021

10.1111/jbi.12743

10.1371/journal.pone.0001745

10.1007/s10886‐014‐0490‐5

10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06305.x

10.1002/ece3.6133

Hidayati S. N., 2016, A review of the biology of Rafflesia: What do we know and what's next?, Bulletin Kebun Raya, 9, 67

IUCN, 2020, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020‐2

10.1073/pnas.1205184109

10.1126/science.215.4528.19

Jin Y., 2020, V.PhyloMaker: Make phylogenetic hypotheses for vascular plants, etc

Karger D. N. Conrad O. Böhner J. Kawohl T. Kreft H. Soria‐Auza R. W. Zimmermann N. E. Linder H. P. &Kessler M.(2017a).Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas.Dryad Digital Repository.https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd1d4

10.1038/sdata.2017.122

10.1098/rspb.2014.0675

10.1073/pnas.1516109112

Kitalong A. H., 2014, Native trees of Palau: A field guide

10.1007/s00442‐002‐1073‐7

10.1038/s41467-020-18530-5

10.1007/s00442-008-1023-0

10.1111/j.1365‐2699.2010.02297.x

10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.03.021

10.1073/pnas.1502540113

Martin P. S., 1967, Pleistocene extinctions; the search for a cause

10.1111/btp.13056

10.1890/14-1931.1

10.5061/dryad.wh70rxwpg

10.1093/aobpla/plv088

10.1371/journal.pone.0198960

10.1017/S0266467411000654

10.1098/rspb.2019.2643

10.1111/j.0022‐0477.2004.00884.x

Ong L., 2019, Elephant frugivory and wild boar seed predation of Irvingia malayana, a large‐fruited tree, in a rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 67, 160170

10.1098/rspb.2018.0882

Owen‐Smith R. N., 1998, Megaherbivores: The influence of very large body size on ecology

10.1007/s00442‐014‐2971‐1

10.1111/ecog.03163

POWO, 2020, Plants of the World Online

R Core Team, 2020, R: A language and environment for statistical computing

10.1111/1365‐2745.12157

10.1017/S0266467415000346

10.1002/ajb2.1019

10.1007/978-94-017-7570-0_5

10.1111/btp.12889

10.1038/s41598‐018‐32604‐x

10.1007/s11692‐016‐9374‐7

vanStrien N. J.(1974).Dicerorhinus sumatrensis(Fischer): The Sumatran or two‐horned Asiatic rhinoceros: A study of literature.https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/544209

10.1890/05‐1182

10.1534/genetics.104.039511

10.1007/s00442‐009‐1372‐3