A growth mindset about human minds promotes positive responses to intelligent technology

Cognition - Tập 220 - Trang 104985 - 2022
Jianning Dang1, Li Liu1
1Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akhtar, 2016, Belief in the immutability of attitudes both increases and decreases advocacy, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 475, 10.1037/pspa0000060 Alexander, 1999, Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotype, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.78 Baron-Cohen, 1985, Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?, Cognition, 21, 37, 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 Bartneck, 2004, Rapid prototyping for interactive robots, 136 Beer, 2002, Implicit self-theories of shyness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1009, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.1009 Bickmore, 2003, Subtle expressivity by relational agents, Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Workshop on Subtle Expressivity for Characters and Robots, 3, 1 Bigman, 2018, People are averse to machines making moral decisions, Cognition, 181, 21, 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003 Bigman, 2019, Holding robots responsible: The elements of machine morality, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 365, 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008 Blackwell, 2007, Implicit mindsets about intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention, Child Development, 78, 246, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x Breazeal, 2003, Emotion and sociable humanoid robots, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 119, 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00018-1 Burnette, 2013, Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation, Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655, 10.1037/a0029531 Carr, 2012, “Prejudiced” behavior without prejudice? Beliefs about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 452, 10.1037/a0028849 Castano, 2003, The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity, Political Psychology, 24, 449, 10.1111/0162-895X.00336 Cheung, 2013, Back to the future: Nostalgia increases optimism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1484, 10.1177/0146167213499187 Clarke, 2019, Why the world wants controls over artificial intelligence, Computer Law and Security Review, 35, 423, 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.04.006 Cuddy, 2007, The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631, 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631 Dang, 2021, Robots are friends as well as foes: Ambivalent attitudes toward mindful and mindless AI robots in the United States and China, Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 1, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106612 Datikashvii, 2020, Is it time for financial services to embrace robots?, Technology De Castella, 2015, My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit mindsets about intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 1, 10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y Dweck, 1995, Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267, 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 Dweck, 1975, The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674, 10.1037/h0077149 Dweck, 2012, Implicit theories, Vol. 2, 43 Elliot, 1997, A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218 Epley, 2008, Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds, Psychological Science, 19, 114, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x Fong, 2003, A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143, 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X Fuesting, 2019, Growing STEM: Perceived faculty mindset as an indicator of communal affordances in stem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 260, 10.1037/pspa0000154 Gazzola, 2007, The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions, Neuroimage, 35, 1674, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.003 Geraci, 2006, Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world, Theology and Science, 4, 229, 10.1080/14746700600952993 Giner-Sorolla Gnambs, 2019, Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe, Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 53, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.045 Go, 2019, Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions, Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 304, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020 de Graaf, 2019, People’s explanations of robot behavior subtly reveal mental state inferences Grant, 2003, Clarifying achievement goals and their impact, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541 Gray, 2007, Dimensions of mind perception, Science, 315, 619, 10.1126/science.1134475 Gray, 2011, More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207, 10.1037/a0025883 Gray, 2012, Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley, Cognition, 125, 125, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007 Hancock, 2011, Meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction, Human Factors, 53, 517, 10.1177/0018720811417254 Haslam, 2006, Dehumanization: An integrative review, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252, 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 Haslam, 2005, More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 937, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.937 Haslam, 2004, Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1661, 10.1177/0146167204271182 Heerink, 2006, The influence of a robot’s social abilities on acceptance by elderly users, IEEE International Symposium on Robot & Human Interactive Communication., 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314442 Heslin, 2006, Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching, Personnel Psychology, 59, 871, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00057.x Hong, 1999, Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 Isbister, 2000, Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 251, 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0368 Job, 2010, Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation, Psychological Science, 21, 1686, 10.1177/0956797610384745 Kammrath, 2006, Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497, 10.1177/0146167206291476 Kaplan, 2004, Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1, 465, 10.1142/S0219843604000289 Kitano, 2007, Animism, rinri, modernization: The base of Japanese robotics Lakens, 2014, Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses, European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 701, 10.1002/ejsp.2023 Lambert-Pandraud, 2010, Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 74, 104, 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.104 Lee, 2014, Culturally variable preferences for robot design and use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States Liu, 2018, Should machines express sympathy and empathy? Experiments with a health advice chatbot, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21, 625, 10.1089/cyber.2018.0110 MacDorman, 2015, Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley, Interaction Studies, 16, 141, 10.1075/is.16.2.01mac MacDorman, 2009, Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures, AI & Society, 23, 485, 10.1007/s00146-008-0181-2 Malle, 2019, How many dimensions of mind perception really are there?, 2268 Mangels, 2006, Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75, 10.1093/scan/nsl013 Mischel, 1973, Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality, Psychological Review, 80, 252, 10.1037/h0035002 Molden, 2006, Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development, American Psychologist, 61, 192, 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192 Moon, 2000, Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers, Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 323, 10.1086/209566 Morewedge, 2007, Timescale bias in the attribution of mind, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1, 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.1 Murphy, 2010, A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 283, 10.1177/0146167209347380 Nass, 2000, Machines and mindlessness: Responses to computers, Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81, 10.1111/0022-4537.00153 Nomura, 2004, Psychology in human-robot communication: An attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots O’Keefe, 2018, Implicit mindsets about interest: Finding your passion or developing it?, Psychological Science, 29, 1653, 10.1177/0956797618780643 Premack, 1978, Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515, 10.1017/S0140525X00076512 Rattan, 2010, Who confronts prejudice?, Psychological Science, 21, 952, 10.1177/0956797610374740 Reich-Stiebert, 2019, Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process, Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 290, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.041 Riketta, 2005, Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict, European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 97, 10.1002/ejsp.234 Sarwari, 2019, Who makes better decisions: Humans or robots?, Northeastern Schönbrodt, 2013, At what sample size do correlations stabilize?, Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609, 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 Schumann, 2014, Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 475, 10.1037/a0036738 Sharifi, 2017, Customers’ reactions to technological products: The impact of implicit theories of intelligence, Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 309, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.013 da Silva Frost, 2020, Calibrate your confidence in research findings: A tutorial on improving research methods and practices, Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 10.1017/prp.2020.7 Solberg, 2020, Digital mindsets: Recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation, California Management Review, 62, 105, 10.1177/0008125620931839 Steiger, 2004, Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis, Psychol. Methods, 9, 164, 10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.164 Stein, 2020, Matter over mind? How the acceptance of digital entities depends on their appearance, mental prowess, and the interaction between both, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 142, 10, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102463 Stein, 2019, Stay back, clever thing! Linking situational control and human uniqueness concerns to the aversion against autonomous technology, Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 73, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.021 Stein, 2017, Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind—The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting, Cognition, 160, 43, 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.010 Taddeo, 2018, How AI can be a force for good, Science, 361, 751, 10.1126/science.aat5991 Waytz, 2010, Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219, 10.1177/1745691610369336 Waytz, 2010, Causes and consequences of mind perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 383, 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006 Waytz, 2014, The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113, 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005 Waytz, 2010, Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 410, 10.1037/a0020240 Waytz, 2014, Two motivations for two dimensions of mind, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 278, 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.001 Weisman, 2017, Rethinking people’s conceptions of mental life, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 11374, 10.1073/pnas.1704347114 Wykowska, 2021, Robots as mirrors of the human mind, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30, 34, 10.1177/0963721420978609 Yogeeswaran, 2016, The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research, Journal on Human Robot Interaction, 5, 29, 10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran Yogeeswaran, 2016, The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research, J. Hum. Robot Interact, 5, 29, 10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran Young, 2019, Autonomous morals: Inferences of mind predict acceptance of AI behavior in sacrificial moral dilemmas, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103870 Złotowski, 2017, Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 48, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.008