Gender, discipline, and scientific productivity: the case of Israeli doctoral students

Emerald - Tập 28 Số 1 - Trang 50-64 - 2009
Gad Yair1
1Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to study gender differentials in scientific productivity while looking at academic discipline and advisor practices. The natural sciences and the liberal arts are shown to constitute two organisational cultures which affect the ability of women to attain excellence on a par with men.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study is based on a sample of 660 doctoral students in two universities in Israel. Regression procedures were employed to predict productivity.FindingsThere is a slight gender gap in scientific productivity, but only in single‐authored papers. This suggests that publishing together with an advisor – which is the common practice in the natural sciences – is more conducive to gender parity. Students' reports suggest that their advisors evince little differential treatment of men versus women, thereby ruling out the possibility of overt advisor bias against women. Overall, the natural sciences appear to be more supportive of students' success while the liberal arts seem to challenge students to struggle on their own, putting women in greater jeopardy of suffering family‐work tensions.Practical implicationsUniversities need to appreciate the disciplinary differences within them and help students to get greater support in the “natural selection” mechanisms that are often unconsciously employed in higher education.Originality/valueThis paper adds an important angle in appreciating currently dominant approaches to work‐family balances while focusing on unintended exclusionary mechanisms embedded in the standards and culture of different scientific disciplines.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ayalon, H. (2003), “Women and men go to university: mathematical background and gender differences in choice of field in higher education”, Sex Roles, Vol. 48 Nos 5/6, pp. 277‐90. Ayalon, H. and Shavit, Y. (2004), “Educational reforms and inequalities in Israel: the MMI hypothesis revisited”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 103‐20. Barber, B. (1952), Science and the Social Order, Collier, New York, NY. Bourdieu, P. (2001), Masculine Domination, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Charles, M. and Bradley, K. (2002), “Equal but separate? A cross‐national study of sex segregation in higher education”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 67 No. 4, pp. 573‐99. Cole, J.R. and Singer, B. (1991), “A theory of limited differences: explaining the productivity puzzle in science”, in Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R. and Bruer, J.T. (Eds), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, W.W. Norton & Co., New York, NY, pp. 277‐310. Coleman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA. Cotterill, P. and Letherby, G. (2005), “Women in higher education: issues and challenges”, Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 109‐13. Damrosch, D. (1995), We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Danowitz Sagaria, M.A. (2007), Universities and Change: Gender Equality in the European Union and the United States, Palgrave, New York, NY. David, M.E., Ball, S.J., Davies, J. and Reay, D. (2003), “Gender issues in parental involvement in student choices of higher education”, Gender and Education, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 21‐36. De Graaf, N.D., De Graaf, P.M. and Kraaykamp, G. (2000), “Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in The Netherlands: a refinement of the cultural capital perspective”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 92‐111. Delamont, S., Paul, A. and Parry, O. (2000), The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School, Falmer, London and New York, NY. DiMaggio, P. (1982), “Cultural capital and school success: the impact of status culture participation on the grades of US high school students”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 189‐201. Fox, M.F. (2001), “Women, science, and academia: graduate education and careers”, Gender and Society, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 654‐66. Frenkel, M. (2008), “Reprogramming femininity? The construction of gender identities in the Israeli high‐tech industry between global and local gender orders”, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 352‐74. Guri‐Rosenblit, S. (1996), “Trends in access to Israeli higher education 1981‐96: from a privilege to a right”, European Journal of Education, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 321‐40. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965), The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New York, NY. Hargens, L.L. and Hagstrom, W.O. (1967), “Sponsored and contest mobility of American academic scientists”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 24‐38. Hochschild, A.R. (1997), The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, Owl Books, New York, NY. Jacobs, J.A. (1996), “Gender inequality and higher education”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 22, pp. 153‐85. Jacobs, J.A. (1999), “Gender and the stratification of colleges”, Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 161‐87. Jacobs, J.A. (2004), “The faculty time divide”, Sociological Forum, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 3‐27. Karen, D. (1991), “The politics of class, race, and gender: access to higher education in the United States 1960‐1986”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 99 No. 2, pp. 208‐37. Karen, D. (2002), “Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980‐1992”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 191‐210. Long, S.J. (1992), “Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity”, Social Forces, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 159‐78. Long, S.J. and Fox, M.F. (1995), “Scientific careers: universalism and particularism”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 21, pp. 45‐71. McNamee, S.J. and Miller, R.K. (2004), The Meritocracy Myth, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD. Merton, R.K. (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Morley, L. and Walsh, V. (1995), Feminist Academics: Creative Agents for Change, Taylor & Francis, London. Reskin, B.F. (1979), “Academic sponsorship and scientists' careers”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 129‐46. Shils, E. (1967), “Color, the universal intellectual community, and the Afro‐Asian intellectual”, Daedalus, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 279‐95. Shils, E. (1983), The Academic Ethic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Stack, S. (2002), “Gender and scholarly productivity: 1970‐2000”, Sociological Focus, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 285‐96. Steinpreis, R., Anders, K.A. and Ritzke, D. (1999), “The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: a national empirical study”, Sex Roles, Vol. 41 Nos 7/8, pp. 509‐28. Toren, N. and Moore, D. (1998), “The academic ‘hurdle race’: a case study”, Higher Education, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 267‐83. Trix, F. and Psenka, C. (2003), “Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty”, Discourse and Society, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 191‐220. Wenneras, C. and Wold, A. (1997), “Nepotism and sexism in peer‐review”, Nature, Vol. 387, pp. 341‐3. Xie, Y. and Schauman, K.A. (1998), “Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 847‐70. Yogev, A. (2000), “The stratification of Israeli universities: implications for higher education policy”, Higher Education, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 183‐201. Young, M. (1958), The Rise of the Meritocracy: 1870‐2033, Thames and Hudson, London. Zuckerman, H. (1988), “The sociology of science”, in Smelser, N. (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 511‐74. Zuckerman, H. (1991), “The careers of men and women scientists: a review of current research”, in Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R. and Bruer, J.T. (Eds), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, pp. 27‐56.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 28 Số 1

50-64

Thông tin tác giả