Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique
Tóm tắt
Joint-line restitution is one objective of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the joint line is often lowered when resurfacing femoral implants are used. The aim of this study was to compare the joint-line height in UKA performed by robotic-assisted and conventional techniques. This retrospective case–control study compared two matched groups of patients receiving a resurfacing UKA between 2013 and 2016 by either a robotic-assisted (n = 40) or conventional (n = 40) technique. Each group comprised 27 women and 13 menm wuth a mean age of 69 and 68 years, respectively. Indications for surgery were osteoarthritis (n = 35) and condylar osteonecrosis (n = 5). Two validated radiologic measurement methods were used to assess joint-line height. Forty UKA (23 medial and 17 lateral) were analysed in each group. Restitution of joint-line height was significantly improved in the robotic-assisted group compared than the control group: +1.4 mm ±2.6 vs +4.7 mm ± 2.4 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 1, and +1.5 mm ±2.3 vs +4.6 mm ±2.5 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 2. Restitution of joint-line height in resurfacing UKA can be improved with robotic-assisted surgery. Improvement in clinical outcome measures must be demonstrated with long-term studies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Lee JY, In Y (2016) Differences in patient-reported outcomes between Unicompartmental and Total knee Arthroplasties: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Arthroplast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.034
van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2016) Patients with isolated lateral osteoarthritis: Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Knee 23(6):968–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2016.06.007
Ko YB, Gujarathi MR, Oh KJ (2015) Outcome of Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focusing on complications. Knee Surg Relat Res 27(3):141–148. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.3.141
Epinette JA, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P, Mole D, Cazenave A, French Society for H et al (2012) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(6 Suppl):S124–S130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.002
Barbadoro P, Ensini A, Leardini A, d’Amato M, Feliciangeli A, Timoncini A et al (2014) Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3147-6
Whiteside LA (2005) Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplast 20(4 Suppl 2):2–3
Lustig S, Lording T, Frank F, Debette C, Servien E, Neyret P (2014) Progression of medial osteoarthritis and long term results of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: 10 to 18 year follow-up of 54 consecutive implants. Knee 21(Suppl 1):S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50006-3
Small SR, Berend ME, Rogge RD, Archer DB, Kingman AL, Ritter MA (2013) Tibial loading after UKA: evaluation of tibial slope, resection depth, medial shift and component rotation. J Arthroplast 28(9 Suppl):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.004
Pearle AD, O’Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO (2010) Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25(2):230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.024
Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M (2016) Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(8):627–635. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00664
Citak M, Suero EM, Citak M, Dunbar NJ, Branch SH, Conditt MA et al (2013) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique? Knee 20(4):268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.001
Lonner JH, Smith JR, Picard F, Hamlin B, Rowe PJ, Riches PE (2015) High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):206–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3764-x
Weber P, Schroder C, Laubender RP, Baur-Melnyk A, von Schulze PC, Jansson V et al (2013) Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2468–2473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2617-6
Neyret PDG (1997) Unicompartmental knee replacement: biomaterials and design. In: Deschamps G, Hernigou P (eds) Cartier P EJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Exp, Scient, pp 56–60
Hansen DC, Kusuma SK, Palmer RM, Harris KB (2014) Robotic guidance does not improve component position or short-term outcome in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29(9):1784–1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.012
van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD (2016) Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(11):3482–3495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9
Kwon OR, Kang KT, Son J, Suh DS, Baek C, Koh YG (2017) Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 35(2):347–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23279
Simpson DJ, Price AJ, Gulati A, Murray DW, Gill HS (2009) Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement--a possible cause of pain. Med Eng Phys 31(7):752–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.02.004
Deschamps G, Chol C (2011) Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(6):648–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.003
Kuwashima U, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Okamoto S et al (2015) Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 4(8):128–133. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.48.2000416
Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165
Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21(6 Suppl 2):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.012
O’Donnell TM, Abouazza O, Neil MJ (2013) Revision of minimal resection resurfacing unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: results compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.031
Ponzio DY, Lonner JH (2016) Robotic technology produces more conservative Tibial resection than conventional techniques in UKA. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 45(7):E465–E468
Servien E, Fary C, Lustig S, Demey G, Saffarini M, Chomel S et al (2011) Tibial component rotation assessment using CT scan in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):272–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.002