Student perspectives on camera usage to engage and connect in foundational education classes: It's time to turn your cameras on

Chanel M. Schwenck1, Jessica D. Pryor2
1Department of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky, USA
2Henry County Virtual Academy, Henry County Schools, Paris, Tennessee, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aleman, 2020, The silent danger of social distancing, Psychological Medicine, 1 Alonzo Diaz, 2009, Are the functions of teachers in eLearning and FacetoFace learning environments really different?, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12, 331 Bates, 2016, Online professional development, Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 10.1177/0031721716629662 Bergstrand, 2013, The Chalkboard versus the avatar: Comparing the effectiveness of online and in class courses, Teaching Sociology, 41, 294, 10.1177/0092055X13479949 Cabero, 2006 Castelli, 2021, Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.7123 Chen, 2008, Learning at a distance: Engaged or not?, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4 Conklina, 2017, Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives, Research on Education and Media, 9, 17, 10.1515/rem-2017-0004 Dean, 2012, Student identity, disengagement, and learning, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 228, 10.5465/amle.2009.0081 Dennis, 2003, Problem based learning in online vs. face-to-face environments, Eue, 16, 198 Hew, 2014, Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 320, 10.1111/bjet.12235 Johnson, 2006, Connecting, making meaning, and learning in the electronic classroom: Reflections on facilitating learning at a distance, Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 56 Johnston, 2020, Creating better definitions of distance education, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 23 Kock, 2007, Media naturalness and online learning: Findings supporting both the significant- and no-significant-difference perspectives, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 333, 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00144.x Lin, 2020, Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses, Asian Journal of Distance Education Marsap, 2009, The integration of distance learning via internet and face to face learning: Why face to face learning is required in distance learning via internet?, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2871, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.510 Martin, 2016, Impact of cohort bonds on student satisfaction and engagement, Current Issues in Education, 19 Olt, 2018, Virtually there: Distant freshmen blended in classes through synchronous online education, Innovative Higher Education, 43, 381, 10.1007/s10755-018-9437-z Page, 2018, Comparing trends in graduate assessment: Face-to-face vs. online learning, Eue, 30, 3 Pike, 2011, An Investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement, Research in Higher Education, 52, 300, 10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1 Poston, 2015, How to engage students and create high teaching presence in online courses, 38 Pryor, 2020 Reinoehl, 1929, Standardizing correspondence instruction, The Journal of Educational Research, 20, 260, 10.1080/00220671.1929.10879989 Saba, 2011, Distance education in the United States: Past, present, future, Educational Technology, 51, 11 Schmeeckle, 2003, Online training: An evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of training law enforcement personnel over the internet, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 205, 10.1023/A:1025028806189 Smith, 2016, Engage me and I learn, The Phi Delta Kappan, 98, 41, 10.1177/0031721716671905 Wong, 1979, The relationship between assignment completion and the attrition and achievement in correspondence courses, The Journal of Educational Research, 72, 165, 10.1080/00220671.1979.10885144