EltonTraits 1.0: Species‐level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals

Ecology - Tập 95 Số 7 - Trang 2027-2027 - 2014
Hamish Wilman1, Jonathan Belmaker2,1, Jennifer E. Simpson1,3, Carolina de la Rosa1, Marcelo M. Rivadeneira4, Walter Jetz1,5
1Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA
2Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3Scientific Technologies Corporation, 4400 East Broadway Boulevard Suite 705, Tucson, Arizona 85711 USA
4Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Aridas (CEAZA) and Universidad Católica del Norte, Av. Ossandón 877, C.P. 178168, Coquimbo, Chile
5Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, SL5 7PY Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

Species are characterized by physiological, behavioral, and ecological attributes that are all subject to varying evolutionary and ecological constraints and jointly determine species' role and function in ecosystems. Attributes such as diet, foraging strata, foraging time, and body size, in particular, characterize a large portion of the “Eltonian” niches of species. Here we present a global species‐level compilation of these key attributes for all 9993 and 5400 extant bird and mammal species derived from key literature sources. Global handbooks and monographs allowed the consistent sourcing of attributes for most species. For diet and foraging stratum we followed a defined protocol to translate the verbal descriptions into standardized, semiquantitative information about relative importance of different categories. Together with body size (continuous) and activity time (categorical) this enables a much finer distinction of species' foraging ecology than typical categorical guild assignments allow. Attributes lacking information for specific species are flagged, and interpolated values based on taxonomy are provided instead. The presented data set is limited by, among others, these select cases missing observed data, by errors and uncertainty in the expert assessment as presented in the literature, and by the lack of intraspecific information. However, the standardized and transparent nature and complete global coverage of the data set should support an array of potential studies in biogeography, community ecology, macroevolution, global change biology, and conservation. Potential uses include comparative work involving these traits as focal or secondary variables, ecological research on the trait or trophic structure of communities, or conservation science concerned with the loss of function among species or in ecosystems in a changing world. We hope that this publication will spur the sharing, collaborative curation, and extension of data to the benefit of a more integrative, rigorous, and global biodiversity science.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo