“Think about how fascinating this is”: Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines

Journal of English for Academic Purposes - Tập 43 - Trang 100809 - 2020
Hang Zou1,2, Ken Hyland1
1School of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia, UK
2School of Foreign Languages, East China Normal University, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amsen, 2008, Who benefits from science blogging?, Hypothesis, 4, 10, 10.5779/hypothesis.v4i2.56

Anthony, 2018

Bakhtin, 1981

Becher, 2001

Bondi, 2018, Blogs as interwoven polylogues: The dialogic action game, Languages and Dialogues, 8, 43, 10.1075/ld.00004.bon

Bondi, 2018, Try to prove me wrong: Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs, Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 33, 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011

Bygate, 2005, Applied linguistics: A pragmatic discipline, a generic discipline?, Applied Linguistics, 26, 568, 10.1093/applin/ami032

Carrió-Pastor, 2019, Authorial engagement in business emails: A cross-cultural analysis of attitude and engagement markers, 47

Efimova, 2005, Beyond personal webpublishing: An exploratory study of conversational blogging practices

Elmes

Grafton, 2009, Situating the public social actions of blog posts, 85

Gross, 2015

Harwood, 2005, We do not seem to have a theory. The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing, Applied Linguistics, 26, 343, 10.1093/applin/ami012

Hu, 2015, Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12, 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002

Hyland, 2001, Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles, Written Communication, 18, 549, 10.1177/0741088301018004005

Hyland, 2002, Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing, Applied Linguistics, 23, 215, 10.1093/applin/23.2.215

Hyland, 2002, What do they mean? Questions in academic writing, Text, 22, 529, 10.1515/text.2002.021

Hyland, 2004

Hyland, 2004, Engagement and disciplinarity: The other side of evaluation, 13

Hyland, 2004, Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001

Hyland, 2004, Patterns of engagement: Dialogic features and L2 student writing, 5

Hyland, 2005, Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse, Discourse Studies, 7, 173, 10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, 2008, Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing, English Text Construction, 1, 5, 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl

Hyland, 2010, Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116, 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003

Hyland, 2016, “We must conclude that...”: A diachronic study of academic engagement, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29, 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003

Jiang, 2018, ‘As we can see’: Reader engagement in PhD candidature confirmation reports, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 1, 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.05.003

Kjellberg, 2009, Scholarly blogging practice as situated genre: An analytical framework based on genre theory, Information Research, 14, 1

Kling, 2000, Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306, 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T

Kouper, 2010, Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges, and opportunities, Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1, 10.22323/2.09010202

Koutsantoni, 2004, Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 163, 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001

Kuo, 1999, The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles, English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121, 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6

Lafuente-Millán, 2014, Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, 201, 10.1111/ijal.12019

Lee, 2016, Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays, Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21, 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004

Luzón, 2013, “This is an erroneous argument”: Conflict in academic blog discussions, Discourse, Context & media, 2, 111, 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.04.005

Luzón, 2017, Connecting genres and languages in online scholarly communication: An analysis of research group blogs, Written Communication, 34, 441, 10.1177/0741088317726298

Luzón, 2018, Features of online ELF in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars, Discourse, Context Media, 24, 24, 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.004

Mahrt, 2014, Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions, Journal of Science Communication, 13, 1, 10.22323/2.13030205

Mauranen, 2013, Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13, 7, 10.35360/njes.274

Mauranen, 2016

McGrath, 2012, Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 161, 10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002

McLaren-Hankin, 2019, Rebuilding trust in the banking sector: Engaging with readers in corporate press releases, 87

Myers, 2010

Puschmann, 2014, Micro)blogging science? Notes on potentials and constraints of new forms of scholarly communication, 89

Sacks, 1979, Two preferences in the organiartion of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction, 15

Shanahan, 2011, Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging, Journalism, 12, 903, 10.1177/1464884911412844

Smart, 2016, Discourse coalitions, science blogs, and the public debate on global climate, 157

Sperber, 1995

Swales, 1998, Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing, Applied Linguistics, 19, 97, 10.1093/applin/19.1.97

Talja, 2007, The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources, Journal of Information Science, 33, 115, 10.1177/0165551506068153

Thompson, 1998, Why ask questions in monologue? language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk, 137

Walker, 2006, Blogging from inside the ivory tower, 127

Zou, 2019, Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs, Discourse Studies, 21, 713, 10.1177/1461445619866983