“Opening Up” and “Closing Down”
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, R., 2002, Guardian
Aoki, M. 1996. An evolutionary parable of the gains from international organizational diversity. In The mosaic of economic growth , edited by R. Landau, T. Taylor, and G. Wright , 247-80. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
Baldwin, T., 2004, Times
Barry, A., 2001, Political machines: Governing a technological society
BBC., 1985, Edge of darkness, April 11—September 12, 1985
———. 2006. BBC news: The nuclear debate, July 2006.
———. 2007. BBC news: Blair defiant over nuclear plans, February 15, 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6366725.stm (accessed December 20, 2007).
Beckett, M., 2002, Announcement of the establishing of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management
Bijker, W.B., 1995, Of bicycles, Bakelite and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council., UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology
Blair, T., 2003, Written answers to questions
2005, Announcement of the government energy review in speech at the Confederation of British Industry
2006, Speech concerning a new Anglo-French agreement on the sharing of nuclear expertise
Bohmann, J., 1996, Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy
Broers, A., BBC Reith Lectures 2005
Brown, G., 2004, Speech delivered by the UK Chancellor to UK government conference on advancing enterprise
Chambers, R., 1983, Rural development: Putting the last
Collingridge, D., 1980, The social control of technology
1982, Critical decision making: A new theory of social choice
1983, Technology in the policy process: Controlling nuclear power
Commission of the European Communities., 2000, Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle (COM(2000)1)
Council for Science and Technology., 2000, Technology matters: Report on the exploitation of science and technology by UK business
Crouch, C., 2004, Post-democracy
David, P., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 332
Davies, G., 2003, Deliberative mapping: Appraising options for addressing `the kidney gap
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)., 2003, GM nation: Findings of a public debate
2004, Evidence and innovation: Defra's needs from the sciences over the next 10 years
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)., 2003, Energy white paper: Our energy future— creating a low carbon economy
2006, The energy challenge: Report of the UK Government Energy Review
de W. Waller,D.R., 2006, Analysis of responses to the energy review consultation (DTI Pub. 06-1565)
Dodgson, J., the DTLR. 2001. Multi-criteria analysis: A manual
2002, Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations
Dryzek, J., Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
Econexus, the Five Year Freeze, Friends of the Earth, GeneWatch UK, Greenpeace, the Soil Association, and Michael Antoniou. 2003. Comments on GM Science Review. Derby: Genewatch.
Engineering and Physical Science Research Council., 2006, Keeping the nuclear option open
Environmental Audit Committee., 2005, Keeping the lights on: Nuclear, renewables, and climate change (Sixth Report, Session 2005-6, HC 584)
European Environment Agency., 2001, Late lesson from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1898-2000
European Science and Technology Observatory., 1999, On science and precaution in the management of technological risk (EUR19056 EN)
Feenberg, A., 2002, Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford, UK, 10.1093/oso/9780195146158.001.0001
Fiorino, D., 1989, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14, 501
Fischer, F., 1990, Technocracy and the politics of expertise
Flyvbjerg, B., 1998, Rationality and power: Democracy in practice
Foucault, M., 1980, Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977
Fransella, F., 2004, A manual for repertory grid technique, 2
1986, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
Gieryn, T. 1995. Boundaries of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff , G. Makle, J. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 393-443. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
GM Science Review Panel (SRP)., 2003, GM science review: First report
2004, GM science review: Second report
Goffman, E., 1974, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience
Goldman, A., 2001, Social epistemology
Griffin, G., 2002, Reputation management
Grove-White, R., 2006, ' Community Genetics, 9, 170
Grove-White, R., 1997, Uncertain world. Genetically modified organisms, food and public attitudes in Britain. Lancaster, UK: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
Grove-White, R., 2000, Wising up: The public and new technologies. Lancaster, UK: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
Habermas, J., 1968, Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics
1975, Legitimation crisis
1984, The philosophical discourse of modernity
Health and Safety Executive., 2006, Discussion document on review of strategy for regulating new nuclear power station design
HM Treasury., 2004, Science & innovation investment framework 2004-2014
Holt, Mulroy, 2003, Reputation management
Hood, C. 2002. Managing risk and managing blame: A political science approach. In Risk, democratic citizenship and public policy , edited by A. Weale, 73-84. Oxford , UK: Oxford University/British Academy Press.
Horlick-Jones, T. 1996. The problem of blame. In Accident and design: Contemporary debates in risk management, edited by C. Hood and D. Jones , 34-47. London : UCL Press.
Horlick-Jones, T., 2004, A deliberative future? An independent evaluation of the GM nation? Public debate about the possible commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain
Hughes, T., 1983, Networks of power: Electrification in Western society 1880-1930, 10.56021/9780801828737
Irwin, A., 1995, Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development
2001, Public Understanding of Science, 10, 10
Jasanoff, S., 1990, The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers
2005, Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States
Joss, S., 1995, Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe
King, D., 2005, Guardian
Kooiman, J. 1993. Governance and governability: Using complexity, dynamics and diversity. In Modern governance, edited by J. Kooiman, 35-48. London: Sage.
Leach, M., I. Scoones, and B. Wynne. 2005. Introduction. In Science, citizenship and globalisation, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 3-14. London: Zed.
Leib, E., 2005, Deliberative democracy in America: A proposal for a popular branch of government
Margolis, H., 1996, Dealing with risk
Mayer, S., 2004, GM nation? Engaging people in real debate?
McDowell, W., 2006, Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: A multi-criteria mapping of the UKSHEC hydrogen futures—full report
Misa, T., 2003, Modernity and technology
Misztal, B., 1996, Trust in modern societies
Morris, J., 2000, Rethinking risk and the precautionary principle
Munro, R., 1996, Accountability: Power, ethos and the technologies of managing
National Research Council., 1996, Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society
Nowotny, H., 2006, Rethinking interdisciplinarity: The potential of transdisciplinarity
Nowotny, H., 2001, Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty
Nuclear Industry Association., 2006, Nuclear new build: The legal challenge
Nuclear Spin. 2006. Web-access database. http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Main_Page (accessed August 22, 2006).
O'Brien, M., 2000, Making better environmental decisions: An alternative to risk assessment
Office of Nuclear Energy., 2006, Improving the nuclear engineering and science curricula
Ogilvie, J., 2002, Creating better futures: Scenario planning as a tool for a better tomorrow, 10.1093/oso/9780195146110.001.0001
O'Neill, O., 2002, A question of trust: The 2002 BBC Reith lectures
O'Riordan, T., 2000, Reinterpreting the precautionary principle
Owen, H., 1997, Open space technology: A user's guide, 2
Owens, S., 2002, Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process
Pimbert, M., 2002, Prajateerpu: A citizens jury/scenario workshop on food and farming futures for Andhra Pradesh, India
Rawls, J., 1993, Political liberalism
1997, University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 767
Rescher, N., 1993, Pluralism: Against the demand for consensus
Saltelli, A., 2001, Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment
Schwartz, M., 1990, Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology and social choice
Sclove, D., 1995, Democracy and technology
Scoones, I., 2001, Prajateerpu e-forum on participatory processes for policy change
Smith A., 2007, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 8, 1
———. 1997. Multicriteria mapping: Mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? In Valuing nature: Economics, ethics and environment , edited by J. Foster, 186-210. London : Routledge.
1998, On the economics and analysis of diversity. SPRU Electronic Working Paper No. 2
———. 2003. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: Some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In Negotiating change , edited by F. Berkhout, M. Leach, and I. Scoones , 33-76. London : Elgar.
———. 2005. Opening up or closing down: Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, edited by M. Leach, I. Scoones , and B. Wynne, 218-31. London : Zed.
2006, Land Use Policy, 23, 85
———. 2006b. Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In Sustainability and reflexive governance, edited by J.P. Voß and R. Kemp, 335-72. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
A. Jordan, Science, precaution and participation: Towards more `reflexive governance' for sustainability
Stirling, A., 2006, Obesity Review, 8, 17
Strategy Unit of the Prime Minister (SU)., 2002, The energy review
Sustainable Development Commission., 2006, Submission to the DTI nuclear review
Taverne, D., 2005, The march of unreason: Science, democracy and the new fundamentalism
U.K. Centre for Economy, Environment and Development., 1999, Final report of consensus conference on radioactive waste management
United Nations Development Programme., 2000, Statement by M. Malloch Brown, head of the United Nations Development Programme
Van Zwanenberg, P., 2004, BSE: Risk, science and governance
Vig, N., 2000, Parliaments and technology: The development of technology assessment in Europe
Wakeford, T., 2001, PLA Notes, 40, 7
2002, Social Research Update, 37, 1
Wallace, H., 2001, PLA Notes, 40, 61
Weldon, S., 2001, UK national report: Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment (ADAPTA) (Project No. BIO-CT98-0318)
Werner, R., 2004, Designing strategy: Scenario analysis and the art of making business strategy
Wilsdon, J., 2004, See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream
Winner, L., 1977, Autonomous technology: Technics out of control as a theme in political thought
Woodward, W., 2007, Guardian
———. 1995. Technology assessment and reflexive social learning: Observations from the risk field. In Managing technology in society, edited by A. Rip, T. Misa, and J. Schot , 19-36. London : Pinter.
———. 1996. May the sheep safely graze? In Risk environment and modernity: Toward a new ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski , and B. Wynne, 44-83. London : Sage.
———. 1997. Methodology and institutions: Value as seen from the risk field. In Valuing nature: Economics, ethics and environment , edited by J. Foster, 135-52. London : Routledge.