“Natural” Claims in Food Advertising: Policy Implications of Filling the Regulatory Void with Consumer Class Action Lawsuits

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing - Tập 34 Số 1 - Trang 131-141 - 2015
Ross D. Petty1
1Professor of Marketing Law and Faculty Scholar, Division of Accounting and Law, Babson College

Tóm tắt

Many consumers find advertising and labeling claims that a food is natural to be both compelling and trustworthy. For this reason, both the Federal Trade Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have long considered taking regulatory action to define “natural” in the food advertising context to prevent deception. However, neither agency has taken definitive action. As a result, consumer class action attorneys have seized this opportunity of regulatory inaction to file numerous lawsuits against food marketers that advertise their products as natural. Unfortunately, the litigation to date has predominantly involved procedural issues such as class certification rather than policy issues regarding an appropriate definition of “natural” for food advertising. The piecemeal approach of litigation is unlikely to result in a consistent, well-reasoned definition of “natural” for the benefit of food advertisers and consumers alike. However, the litigation does demonstrate continued interest in this issue, and perhaps this interest will cause regulatory agencies to reconsider providing better guidance, if not formal regulation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barrett Paul M., 2000, The Wall Street Journal, A1

Farris April L., 2010, Food and Drug Law Journal, 65, 403

FTC Staff, 1978, Proposed Trade Regulation Rule on Food Advertising Phase I: Staff Report and Recommendations

Khan Ikhias A., 2009, Leung's Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients: Used in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics

10.1177/074391568300200104

Lantagne Stacey M., 2012, Journal of Business & Technology Law, 8, 117

Negowetti Nicole E., 2013, Maine Law Review, 65, 581

10.1509/jppm.14.FTC.007

Thain Gerald J., 1973, Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal, 28, 617

10.1177/002224298404800202