(Mis)representations of Kant’s moral theory in applied ethics textbooks: emphasis on universalizability, absence of autonomy
Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Trang 1-13 - 2023
Tóm tắt
This study examined representations of Kant’s theory of ethics in three applied ethics open textbooks. In two of the three textbooks, the concept of autonomy, which is the foundational concept in Kant’s theory, was generally missing. The three textbooks introduced and explained Kant’s emphasis on duty, but only one of them explicated the connection between duty and autonomy. All three textbooks introduced and explained Kant’s concept of universalizability. All of them also introduced the Formula of Humanity (FH), however, none of them explained what Kant meant by “humanity” in that formula (Kant defined humanity as “the capacity to set ends”). The study concluded with recommendations for textbook authors on how to write valid and comprehensive introductions to Kant’s theory. The recommendations were the following: First, Kant’s theory should be introduced as a theory of both autonomy and duty. Second, the Formula of Universal Law (FUL) should be introduced as a tool that supports agents in practicing autonomy, not as a formula that should be blindly followed; blindly following formulas contradicts with Kant’s commitment to the unconditional respect of human autonomy. Finally, when introducing Kant’s command to treat humanity as an end-in-itself, it is important to explain what he meant by humanity and by end-in-itself.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allison, H. E. 2012. Autonomy in Kant and German idealism. In Kant on moral autonomy, ed. O. Sensen. 129–145. Cambridge University Press.
Barrett, D. H., L. W. Ortmann, A. Dawson, C. Saenz, A. Reis and G. Bolan (Eds) (2016). Public health ethics: Cases spanning the globe. Springer Open.
Byars, S. M., and K. Stanberry. 2018. Business ethics. OpenStax. Retrieved from https://openstax.org/details/books/business-ethics.
Ellington, J. W. 1993. Introduction. In Grounding for the metaphysics of morals, ed. I. Kant. v–xiii (JW Ellington, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Fichte, J. G. 1848/2019. The vocation of man. Anodos Books.
Guyer, P. 2014. Kant. Routledge.
Kant, I. 1785/2009. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Martinelli-Fernandez, S. 2002. Kant, lies, and business ethics. Teaching Ethics 2(2): 41–52.
McCartney, S., and R. Parent. 2015. Ethics in law enforcement. BCcampus. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/ethicsinlawenforcement/.
Ortmann, L. W., D. H. Barrett, C. Saenz, R. G. Bernheim, A. Dawson, J. A. Valentine, and A. Reis. 2016. Public health ethics: Global cases, practice, and context. Public health ethics: Cases spanning the globe, 3–35. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23847-0.
Schneewind, J. B. 1992. Autonomy, obligation, and virtue: An overview of Kant’s moral philosophy. In The Cambridge companion to Kant, ed. P. Guyer. 309–341. Cambridge University Press.
Schroeder, H. H. 1940. Some common misinterpretations of the Kantian ethics. The Philosophical Review 49(4): 424–446.
Stohr, K. 2022. Choosing freedom: A Kantian guide to life. Oxford University Press.
Villarán, A. 2017. Irrational advertising and moral autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics 144(3): 479–490.
Wood, A. 2008. Kantian ethics. Cambridge University Press.