“It’s not my dream, actually”: students’ identity work across figured worlds of construction engineering in Sweden

International Journal of STEM Education - Tập 6 - Trang 1-17 - 2019
Allison J. Gonsalves1, Eva Silfver2, Anna Danielsson3, Maria Berge2
1Faculty of Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
2Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
3Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Research in engineering education has pointed to the need for new engineers to develop a broader skill-set with an emphasis on “softer” social skills. However, there remains strong tensions in the identity work that engineers must engage in to balance the technical demands of the discipline with the new emphasis on heterogeneous skills (Faulkner, Social Studies of Science 37:331–356, 2007). This study explores how three unconventional students experience these tensions in the final year of their construction engineering program, and as they move in and out of workplace field experiences. Using a figured worlds framework (Holland et al., Identity and agency in cultural worlds, 1998), we explore the dominant subject positions for students in construction engineering classroom and workplaces in a 3-year Swedish engineering program. Results demonstrate that dominant subject positions for construction engineers can trouble students’ identity work as they move across classroom and workplace settings. This study expands our knowledge of the complexity of students’ identity work across classroom and workplace settings. The emergence of classroom and workplace masculinities that shape the dominant subject positions available to students are shown to trouble the identity work that students engage in as they move across these learning spaces. We examine students’ identity strategies that contribute to their persistence through the field. Finally, we discuss implications for teaching and research in light of students’ movements across these educational contexts.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., et al. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48–88. Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. Berge, M., Silfver, E., & Danielsson, A. (2018). In search of the new engineer: Gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Brickhouse, N. W., Eisenhart, M. A., & Tonso, K. L. (2006). Forum identity politics in science and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 309–324. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869. Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. London: SAGE Publications. Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity. Dahlbom, B., & Mathiassen, L. (1997). The future of our profession. Communications of the ACM, 40(6), 80–89. Dahlgren, M. A., Hult, H., Dahlgren, L. O., af Segerstad, H. H., & Johansson, K. (2006). From senior student to novice worker: Learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 569–586. de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). History of problem-based and project-based learning. In E. Graaff & A. Kolmos (Eds.), Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (pp. 1–8). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Eliot, M., & Turns, J. (2011). Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professional identity development for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 630–654. Eliot, M., Turns, J., & Xu, K. (2008). Engineering students’ extrinsic and intrinsic strategies for the construction of professional identity. In Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Davos, Switzer- land Retrieved from http://www.engconfintl.org/. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Erwin, L., & Maurutto, P. (1998). Beyond access: Considering gender deficits in science education. Gender and Education, 10(1), 51–69. Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social studies of science, 30(5), 759–792. Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and bolts and people’s gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356. Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures: II: Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 169–189. Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103–115. Francis, B. (1999). Lads, lasses and (new) labour: 14–16-year-old students’ responses to the ‘laddish behaviour and boys’ underachievement’ debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 355–371. Gallagher, P. (2015). Graduate transition into work: The bridging role of graduate placement programmes in the small- and medium-sized enterprise workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 28(5), 461–480. Gee, J. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. Gee, J. P. (2010). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York: Routledge. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. Gonsalves, A. J. (2014). “Physics and the girly girl—There is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 503–521. Hatt, B. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39(2), 145–166. Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Huff, J. L., Smith, J. A., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., & Oakes, W. C. (2018). Identity in engineering adulthood: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of early-career engineers in the United States as they transition to the workplace. Emerging Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818780444 Advance online publication. Huff, J. L., Zoltowski, C. B., & Oakes, W. C. (2016). Preparing engineers for the workplace through service learning: Perceptions of EPICS alumni. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 43–69. Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14(1), 37–50. Jackson, C., Dempster, S., & Pollard, L. (2015). “They just don’t seem to really care, they just think it’s cool to sit there and talk”: Laddism in university teaching-learning contexts. Educational Review, 67(3), 300–314. Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 826–857. Jorgenson, J. (2002). Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 350–380. Kittleson, J. M., & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267–293. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Kvande, E. (1999). In the belly of the beast: Constructing femininities in engineering organizations. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6(3), 305–328. Lagesen, V. A., & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). Walking the line? The enactment of the social/technical binary in software engineering. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 129–149. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. Marra, R. M., Steege, L., Tsai, C. L., & Tang, N. E. (2016). Beyond “group work”: An integrated approach to support collaboration in engineering education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 17. Ness, K. (2012). Constructing masculinity in the building trades: ‘Most jobs in the construction industry can be done by women’. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(6), 654–676. Noyes, A. (2004). Video diary: A method for exploring learning dispositions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(2), 193–209. O'Connor, K., Amos, D., Bailey, T., Garrison, L., Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H., et al. (2007). Sponsorship: Engineering’s tacit gatekeeper. In ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings. Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278. Powell, A., Dainty, A., & Bagilhole, B. (2012). Gender stereotypes among women engineering and technology students in the UK: Lessons from career choice narratives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), 541–556. Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 10. Sahin, M. (2010). The impact of problem-based learning on engineering students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of energy and momentum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 519–537. Saldaña, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications, Ltd. Stentiford, L. J. (2018). ‘You can tell which ones are the laddy lads’: Young women’s accounts of the engineering classroom at a high-performing English university. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 218-230. Stevens, R., O'connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368. Teknikföretagen. 2012. “Vilka ingenjörer behövs? Storföretagens syn på svenska ingenjörsutbildningar.” [What engineers are needed? Large companies’ views on Swedish engineering education.] http://docplayer.se/3492426-Vilka-ingenjorer-behovs-storforetagens-syn-pa-svenska-ingenjorsutbildningar.html. Tonso, K. L. (2006a). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 25–37. Tonso, K. L. (2006b). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273–307. Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the Outskirts of Engineering: Learning identity, gender and power via engineering practice. Leiden: Brill | Sense. Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195. Tsai, L. L. (2004). Women in physics?: Identity and discourse in Taiwan (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0055240. Turns, J., Sattler, B., Eliot, M., Kilgore, D., & Mobrand, K. (2012). Preparedness portfolios and portfolio studios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 2(1), 1–13. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Wajcman, J. (2006) New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work. Work, Employment and Society, 20 (4):773–786. Walker, M. (2001). Engineering identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 75–89. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: how working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Routledge.