“How stupid can a person be?” – Students coping with authoritative dimensions of science lessons

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction - Tập 24 - Trang 100367 - 2020
Anttoni Kervinen1, Wolff-Michael Roth2, Kalle Juuti1, Anna Uitto1
1University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 9, FIN-00014, Finland
2University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aguiar, 2010, Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 174 Ainley, 2011, Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001 Arens, 2015, Relations between classroom disciplinary problems and student motivation: Achievement as a potential mediator?, Learning and Instruction, 39, 184, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.001 Bakhtin, 1986 Bakhtin, 1984 Bakhtin, 1984 Barmby, 2008, Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1075, 10.1080/09500690701344966 Barton, 2009, 134 Bellocchi, 2018, Negative emotional events during science inquiry Bellocchi, 2015, “I was proud of myself that I didn’t give up and I did it”: Experiences of pride and triumph in learning science, Science Education, 99, 638, 10.1002/sce.21159 Blackledge, 2009, Meaning-making as dialogic process: Official and carnival lives in the language classroom, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8, 236, 10.1080/15348450903130413 Brown, 2006, Investigation of secondary science teachers’ beliefs and practices after authentic inquiry-based experiences, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 938, 10.1002/tea.20110 Burgin, 2013, Consistency of practical and formal epistemologies of science held by participants of a research apprenticeship, Research in Science Education, 43, 2179, 10.1007/s11165-013-9351-4 Calcagni, 2018, The three domains for dialogue: A framework for analysing dialogic approaches to teaching and learning, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 1, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.001 Crawford, 2014, From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classrooms, Vol. 2, 515 DaSilva Iddings, 2007, Carnival in a mainstream kindergarten classroom: A Bakhtinian analysis of second language learners’ off-task behaviors, The Modern Language Journal, 91, 31, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00508.x DeWitt, 2010, School trips and classroom lessons: An investigation into teacher–student talk in two settings, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 454, 10.1002/tea.20346 Eckert, 1989 FNBE, 2014 Ford, 2012, Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding, Science Education, 96, 369, 10.1002/sce.20482 Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin Books Sociology. Garfinkel, 1986, On formal structures of practical action, 160 Gilbert, 2001, Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 574, 10.1002/tea.1019 Glackin, 2017, “Control must be maintained”: Exploring teachers’ pedagogical practice outside the classroom, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39, 61, 10.1080/01425692.2017.1304204 Goldston, 2009, Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 762, 10.1002/tea.20289 Gormally, 2009, Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3, 16, 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216 Hascher, 2018, School alienation–theoretical approaches and educational research, Educational Research, 60, 171, 10.1080/00131881.2018.1443021 Hascher, 2010, Alienation from school, International Journal of Jducational Research, 49, 220 Hsu, 2014, From authoritative discourse to internally persuasive discourse: Discursive evolution in teaching and learning the language of science, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 729, 10.1007/s11422-012-9475-2 Itzek-Greulich, 2017, Emotional and motivational outcomes of lab work in the secondary intermediate track: The contribution of a science center outreach lab, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54, 3, 10.1002/tea.21334 Jefferson, 1979, A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination, 79 Jordan, 1995, Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39, 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2 Kervinen, 2018, How fieldwork-oriented biology teachers establish formal outdoor education practices, Journal of Biological Education, 1 Kesidou, 2002, How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum review, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 522, 10.1002/tea.10035 Kolstø, 2001, “To trust or not to trust, …”—pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue, International Journal of Science Education, 23, 877, 10.1080/09500690010016102 Kühl Latour, 1987 Lee, 2014, Exploring secondary students’ epistemological features depending on the evaluation levels of the group model on blood circulation, Science & Education, 23, 1075, 10.1007/s11191-013-9639-9 Lehesvuori, 2013, Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 912, 10.1002/tea.21100 Lyons, 2006, Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591, 10.1080/09500690500339621 Mehan, 1979 Morales-Doyle, 2018, Students as curriculum critics: Standpoints with respect to relevance, goals, and science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 749, 10.1002/tea.21438 OECD, 2016 Osborne, 2003, Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049, 10.1080/0950069032000032199 Pekrun, 1992, The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators, Applied Psychology, 41, 359, 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.x Pekrun, 2006, Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test, Journal of educational Psychology, 98, 583, 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583 Phelan, 1994, Navigating the psychosocial pressures of adolescence: The voices and experiences of high school youth, American Educational Research Journal, 31, 415, 10.3102/00028312031002415 Rawls, 2002, Editor’s introduction, 1 Rees, 2017, Interchangeable positions in interaction sequences in science classrooms, Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5 Reznitskaya, 2013, Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching, Educational Psychologist, 48, 114, 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898 Roth, 2005 Roth, 2009 Roth, 2014, At the intersection of text and talk: On the reproduction and transformation of language in the multilingual evaluation of multilingual texts, Semiotica, 202, 109 Roth, 2015, Meaning and the real life of language: Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms, Linguistics and Education, 30, 42, 10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.010 Roth, 1998, >unDELETE science education:/lives/work/voices, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 399, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<399::AID-TEA10>3.0.CO;2-5 Roth, 1999, Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 293, 10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_1 Roth, 2011, A study of laughter in science lessons, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 437, 10.1002/tea.20412 Roth, 2008 Scott, 2006, The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons, Science Education, 90, 605, 10.1002/sce.20131 Selting, 1998, Gesprachsanalytisches transkriptionssystem (GAT), Linguistische Berichte, 91 Sharma, 2009, Recontextualization of science from lab to school: Implications for science literacy, Science & Education, 18, 1253, 10.1007/s11191-007-9112-8 Smith, 1999, Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 755, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<755::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-9 Steffensky, 2015, Professional vision of classroom management and learning support in science classrooms—Does professional vision differ across general and content-specific classroom interactions?, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 351, 10.1007/s10763-014-9607-0 Stroupe, 2018, Fostering students’ epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research, Science Education, 102, 1176, 10.1002/sce.21469 van Booven, 2015, Revisiting the authoritative–dialogic tension in inquiry-based elementary science teacher questioning, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1182, 10.1080/09500693.2015.1023868 van Eijck, 2011, Cultural diversity in science education through novelization: Against the epicization of science and cultural centralization, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 824, 10.1002/tea.20422 Vološinov, 1973 Zhai, 2014, Communicating science to students: Investigating professional botanic garden educators’ talk during guided school visits, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 407, 10.1002/tea.21143