“How should i know what scientists do?—I am just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002, April).The development of conceptions of the nature of scientific knowledge and knowing in the middle and high school years: A cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V.L. (in press). Learning as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science.Science Education.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A year long case study of a fourth grade teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025–1049.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & Roth McDuffie, A. (under review). Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science after participating in an explicit-reflective science methods course.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
BouJaoude, S. (1996).Epistemology and sociology of science according to Lebanese educators and students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 848)
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Perspective and practicing secondary schoolscience teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science.Science Education, 75, 121–134.
Griffiths, A. K., & Barman, C. R. (1995). High school students’ views about the nature of science: Results from three countries.School Science and Mathematics, 95, 248–356.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.
King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science.Science Education, 75, 135–141.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Meichtry, Y.J. (1993). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389–407.
Moss, D. M. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education, 23, 771–790.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2000).NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Available online: <www.nsta.org/159&psid=22>. Retrieved March 4, 2005.