Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Sodium nitroprusside decomposes within a few minutes after intravenous infusion to form metabolites which are pharmacologically inactive but toxicologically important. Free cyanide, which represents 44% w/w of the sodium nitroprusside molar mass, is formed and must be detoxified in the body into thiocyanate using thiosulphate as substrate. Nitroprusside penetrates cell membranes slowly. At therapeutic dose levels its distribution is probably mainly extracellular. Contact with the sulfhydryl groups in the cell walls, however, immediately initiates breakdown of the molecule. Sodium nitroprusside taken orally is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract to any appreciable extent. Cyanides in the body form prussic acid, which can rapidly penetrate mucous and cell membranes. In the blood, about 99% of the prussic acid binds to the methaemoglobin of erythrocytes. At normal physiological levels, however, the total body methaemoglobin of an adult human can only bind about 10mg of prussic acid; this is a small fraction of the amounts usually infused therapeutically as sodium nitroprusside. The endogenous detoxification of prussic acid exhibits zero-order kinetics. The limiting factor is a sulphur donor, principally thiosulphate, which is available in the body in only limited amounts. The rate of spontaneous detoxification of prussic acid in humans is only about 1 μg/kg/min, corresponding to a sodium nitroprusside infusion of about 2 μg/kg/min. This dose limit set by the prussic acid toxicity of sodium nitroprusside can, however, be increased considerably by simultaneous infusion of thiosulphate. A lack of thiosulphate can be detected early by a rise of the prussic acid concentration in the erythrocytes. Thiosulphate taken orally is not absorbed by the body. After intravenous infusion, its serum half-life is about 15 minutes. Most of the thiosulphate is oxidised to sulphate or is incorporated into endogenous sulphur compounds; a small proportion is excreted through the kidneys. Thiocyanate taken orally is completely absorbed by the body. In healthy persons its volume of distribution is approximately 0.25 L/kg and the serum half-life about 3 days; elimination is mainly renal. Thiocyanate toxicity does not represent a serious therapeutic problem with intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside.

The type I interferon (IFN) signaling pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the type I IFN receptor subunit 1. Anifrolumab is approved in several countries for patients with moderate to severe SLE receiving standard therapy. The approved dosing regimen of anifrolumab is a 300-mg dose administered intravenously every 4 weeks; this was initially based on the results of the Phase 2b MUSE and further confirmed in the Phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials, in which anifrolumab 300-mg treatment was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity with an acceptable safety profile. There have been several published analyses of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of anifrolumab, including a population–pharmacokinetic analysis of 5 clinical studies of healthy volunteers and patients with SLE, in which body weight and type I IFN gene expression were significant covariates identified for anifrolumab exposure and clearance. Additionally, the pooled Phase 3 SLE population has been used to evaluate how serum exposure may be related to clinical responses, safety risks, and pharmacodynamic effects of the 21-gene type I IFN gene signature (21-IFNGS). The relevance of 21-IFNGS with regard to clinical efficacy outcomes has also been analyzed. Herein, the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of anifrolumab as well as results of population–pharmacokinetics and exposure–response analyses are reviewed.

Sifalimumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1κ monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes a majority of the subtypes of human interferon-α. Sifalimumab is being evaluated as a treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary objectives of this analysis were (a) to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for sifalimumab in SLE; (b) to identify and quantitate the impact of patient/disease characteristics on pharmacokinetic variability; and (c) to evaluate fixed versus body weight (WT)-based dosing regimens. Sifalimumab serum concentration-time data were collected from a phase Ib study (MI-CP152) designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of sifalimumab in adult patients with SLE. Sifalimumab was administered every 14 days as a 30- to 60-minute intravenous infusion with escalating doses of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10 mg/kg and serum concentrations were collected over 350 days. A total of 120 patients provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data with a total of 2,370 serum concentrations. Sifalimumab serum concentrations were determined using a validated colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a lower limit of quantitation of 1.25 μg/mL. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of sifalimumab was performed using a non-linear mixed effects modeling approach with NONMEM VII software. Impact of patient demographics, clinical indices, and biomarkers on pharmacokinetic parameters were explored using a stepwise forward selection and backward elimination approach. The appropriateness of the final model was tested using visual predictive check (VPC). The impact of body WT-based and fixed dosing of sifalimumab was evaluated using a simulation approach. The final population model was utilized for phase IIb dosing projections. Sifalimumab pharmacokinetics were best described using a two-compartment linear model with first order elimination. Following intravenous dosing, the typical clearance (CL) and central volume of distribution (V 1) were estimated to be 176 mL/day and 2.9 L, respectively. The estimates (coefficient of variation) of between-subject variability for CL and V 1 were 28 and 31 %, respectively. Patient baseline body WT, interferon gene signature from 21 genes, steroid use, and sifalimumab dose were identified as significant covariates for CL, whereas only baseline body WT was a significant covariate for V 1 and peripheral volume of distribution (V 2). Although the above-mentioned covariates were statistically significant, they did not explain variability in pharmacokinetic parameters to any relevant extent (<7 %). Thus, no dosing adjustments are necessary. VPC confirmed good predictability of the final population pharmacokinetic model. Simulation results demonstrate that both fixed and body WT-based dosing regimens yield similar median steady state concentrations and overall variability. Fixed sifalimumab doses of 200, 600, and 1,200 mg monthly (with a loading dose at Day 14) were selected for a phase IIb clinical trial. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model adequately described sifalimumab pharmacokinetics. The estimated typical pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to other monoclonal antibodies without target mediated elimination. Although the population pharmacokinetic analysis identified some statistically significant covariates, they explained <7 % between-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters indicating that these covariates are not clinically relevant. The population pharmacokinetic analysis also demonstrated the feasibility of switching to fixed doses in phase IIb clinical trials of sifalimumab.

Cardiopulmonary bypass is accompanied by profound changes in the organism that may alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Drug distribution can be altered, for example, by changes in blood flow and by haemodilution, with a decrease in protein binding; a decrease in the elimination of some drugs can be caused by impairment of renal or hepatic clearance, due, for example, to lowered perfusion and hypothermia. The subject was reviewed in the Journal in 1982, and the emphasis of the present review is on new data related to specific drugs. The following substances are dealt with: benzodiazepines, cephalosporins, digitalis glycosides, general anaesthetics, glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin), lignocaine (lidocaine), muscle relaxants, nitroprusside, opiates, papaverine and propranolol. For many of these substances an abrupt decrease has been observed in serum concentration upon initiation of bypass, which is explained by haemodilution and an increase in distribution due to decreased protein binding. For nitrates and some opiates, adsorption to the bypass apparatus was shown to be important. The gradual increase in serum concentrations seen during cardiopulmonary bypass with some drugs after the initial fall is usually explained by redistribution of the drug and/or decrease in its elimination. The same phenomena are thought to explain why in the post-bypass period a concentration increase occurs, or at least a slower decrease than expected. However, drug elimination has been directly measured in only a few studies. The short duration of the bypass procedure and the continuous changes during the process hamper a rigorous pharmacokinetic evaluation. Studies allowing more precise understanding of the mechanisms underlying the observed concentration changes are needed, but are difficult to design. Similarly, more data are awaited on the pharmacodynamic and clinical consequences of the concentration changes.

The current treatment for deep vein thrombosis is a 5-to 10-day course of heparin followed by 3 to 6 months of oral anticoagulants. Both heparin and oral anticoagulants present a high inter- and intra-individual variability and require individualisation and monitoring of their dosage. The pharmacokinetic properties of heparin have been difficult to assess through the radiolabelling procedures typically used for many other drugs. This is partially a result of the heterogeneous nature of heparin. Thus, the pharmaco-kinetics of heparin are expressed in terms of its pharmacodynamic activity. Improved coagulation test methodology coupled with the incorporation of patient factors such as bodyweight, height, baseline coagulation status, pretreatment heparin sensitivity and heparin concentrations, can be used to improve the accuracy of heparin dosage determination. Computer-based systems are now available to assist clinicians in quantitating dosage requirements, estimating bleeding risks, and storing patient dose-response relationships for future therapy monitoring. Low molecular weight heparin products might improve our ability to control anticoagulant therapy because drug concentration, as well as the effect on the clotting system, will be more predictable in patients receiving these products. In addition, low molecular weight heparins produce a more consistent, predictable anticoagulant response, and clinicians have a new pharmacological tool which may readily lend itself to patient-controlled, home-based anticoagulant pharmacotherapy. Where pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics could contribute to the optimisation of warfarin treatment is in the initiation of treatment, the estimation of the dosage required, the methods for drug monitoring, the assessment of unusual responses and the avoidance of drug interactions. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods have limited applicability to the optimisation of warfarin therapy because there is no direct relationship between drug concentration and therapeutic effect. However, a variety of simple or sophisticated computer-assisted methods have been developed to help clinicians in individualising and monitoring warfarin treatment. New therapeutic approaches, such as direct thrombin inhibitors and thrombolytic agents, could overcome some limitations of the standard heparin plus oral anticoagulation therapy.

The aim of this study was to measure and investigate correlations of lamotrigine concentrations in maternal as well as umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, and breast milk to account for the distribution of the drug. Concentrations of lamotrigine were measured in 19 mother–infant pairs at the time of delivery. To account for the penetration ratio into amniotic fluid, cord blood and breast milk, the concentration of lamotrigine in the particular environment was divided by the concentration in maternal serum. A no-intercept model was applied for associations between maternal serum concentrations, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk concentrations. The mean daily dosage of lamotrigine was 351.32 mg (range 50–650 mg). We detected associations between maternal serum and amniotic fluid (β = 0.088, p < 0.001), as well as umbilical cord (β = 0.939, p < 0.001) and breast milk (β = 0.964, p < 0.001). The median penetration ratio into amniotic fluid, cord blood, and breast milk was 0.68, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively. Lamotrigine concentrations in amniotic fluid, cord blood, and breast milk give evidence that the fetus/newborn is constantly exposed to lamotrigine. Maternal serum concentrations predicted exposure via amniotic fluid, umbilical cord, and breast milk. Data suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring can be recommended as part of the clinical routine in psychopharmacotherapy for pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Background and objective: Moxifloxacin is a new generation fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent used worldwide. In clinical practice in intensive care units, moxifloxacin may be frequently administered through a nasogastric feeding tube. In the absence of an oral liquid formulation and since the multivalent cations contained in enterai feeds may potentially impair absorption of moxifloxacin administered via this route, we studied the effect of concomitant enterai feeding on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin administered as a crushed tablet through the nasogastric tube. Participants and methods: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, nonblinded, three-way crossover study. Twelve young healthy volunteers (nine females and three males) aged 20–42 years were included in the study. Each participant received three separate treatment regimens in a randomised fashion: an intact moxifloxacin 400mg tablet (regimen A, reference treatment), a crushed moxifloxacin 400mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and a crushed moxifloxacin 400mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with enterai feeding (regimen C). A washout period of 1-week followed each treatment. Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Additionally, the primary parameters indicative for changes in absorption (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC∞] and peak serum concentration [Cmax]), were tested for bioequivalence, assuming log-normally distributed data using ANOVA. Results: All moxifloxacin treatment regimens were well tolerated. The AUC∞ was slightly, but not statistically significantly, decreased in treatments with regimens B and C. AUC∞ (geometric means 39.6 [regimen A] vs 36.1 [regimen B] vs 36.1 mg · h/L [regimen C] and point estimates 91% for B: A and C: A) indicated bioequivalence of the treatments. Bioequivalence criteria of AUC∞ and Cmax were met upon retrospective statistical analysis. Likewise Cmax after moxifloxacin administration through nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and with tube feed (regimen C) were slightly decreased (geometric means 3.20 [regimen A] vs 3.05 [regimen B] vs 2.83 mg/L [regimen C]; point estimates 88% for B: A, and 95% for C: A). They were within the range seen in other studies conducted with oral administration of the drug. No statistically significant differences were observed in time to reach Cmax (tmax; median 1.75 [regimen A] vs 1.00 [regimen B] vs 1.75 hours [regimen C]). Thus, the rate of absorption of moxifloxacin was not affected by administration through a nasogastric tube. This route of ingestion seems to be associated with a slight loss of bioavailability independent of the carrier medium used (water vs enterai feed); no clinically relevant interaction with the multivalent cations contained in the enterai feed was observed, indicating that moxifloxacin and enterai nutrition can be administered concomitantly. Conclusion: There was no clinically relevant effect of enterai feeding on the pharmacokinetics of oral moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers. This result has to be evaluated in patients, particularly those from the intensive care unit, who are characterised by severe infectious and/or concomitant diseases that might influence absorption of moxifloxacin.

This analysis used a population pharmacokinetic approach to identify covariates that influence plasma exposure of liraglutide 3.0 mg, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for weight management in overweight and obese individuals. Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were drawn at weeks 2, 12 and 28 of the phase IIIa SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes (N = 2339) and SCALE Diabetes (N = 584) trials. Dose proportionality of liraglutide in obese subjects was investigated using data from a phase II dose-finding study (N = 331). Dose-proportional exposure of liraglutide up to and including 3.0 mg was confirmed. Body weight and sex influenced exposure of liraglutide 3.0 mg, while age ≥70 years, race, ethnicity and baseline glycaemic status did not. Compared with a reference subject weighing 100 kg, exposure of liraglutide 3.0 mg was 44 % lower for a subject weighing 234 kg (90 % CI 41–47), 41 % higher for a subject weighing 60 kg (90 % CI 37–46), and 32 % higher (90 % CI 28–35) in females than males with the same body weight. Neither injection site nor renal function significantly influenced exposure of liraglutide 3.0 mg (post hoc analysis). Population pharmacokinetics of liraglutide up to and including 3.0 mg daily in overweight and obese adults demonstrated dose-proportional exposure, and limited effect of covariates other than sex and body weight. These findings were similar to those previously observed with liraglutide up to 1.8 mg in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Further analysis of exposure–response relationship and its effect on dose requirements is addressed in a separate publication.