Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
1938-1344
0190-6011
Mỹ
Cơ quản chủ quản: J O S P T , Movement Science Media
Lĩnh vực:
Sports ScienceMedicine (miscellaneous)Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Phân tích ảnh hưởng
Thông tin về tạp chí
The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous content and promotes its application to movement-related health. JOSPT® aims to be the leading international source of knowledge for movement-related health. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. The Journal accepts manuscripts for review from any discipline that addresses orthopaedic or sports physical therapy from any relevant perspective, including clinical practice and outcomes, kinesiology, motor behavior, fitness, gerontology, neuroscience, or epidemiology. While clinical implications should be discussed in all manuscripts submitted for review, JOSPT recognizes the importance of all research types in advancing all aspects of musculoskeletal and sports-related practice. Accordingly, the Journal seeks to publish research spanning the entire spectrum of clinical, basic, and translational science.
Các bài báo tiêu biểu
Intraexaminer Reliability, Interexaminer Reliability, and Mean Values for Nine Lower Extremity Skeletal Measures in Healthy Naval Midshipmen
Tập 25 Số 4 - Trang 253-263 - 1997
Intraexaminer, Interexaminer, and Interdevice Comparability of Leg Length Measurements Obtained with Measuring Tape and Metrecom
Tập 14 Số 6 - Trang 263-268 - 1991
The Effect of Static Stretch and Dynamic Range of Motion Training on the Flexibility of the Hamstring Muscles
Tập 27 Số 4 - Trang 295-300 - 1998
Short-Term Effects of Cervical Kinesio Taping on Pain and Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Acute Whiplash Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Tập 39 Số 7 - Trang 515-521 - 2009
Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping Versus Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study Design Randomized clinical trial. Objective To compare the effectiveness of cervical spine thrust manipulation to that of Kinesio Taping applied to the neck in individuals with mechanical neck pain, using self-reported pain and disability and cervical range of motion as measures. Background The effectiveness of cervical manipulation has received considerable attention in the literature. However, because some patients cannot tolerate cervical thrust manipulation, alternative therapeutic options should be investigated. Methods Eighty patients (36 women) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the manipulation group, which received 2 cervical thrust manipulations, and the tape group, which received Kinesio Taping applied to the neck. Neck pain (11-point numeric pain rating scale), disability (Neck Disability Index), and cervical-range-of-motion data were collected at baseline and 1 week after the intervention by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the patients. Mixed-model analyses of variance were used to examine the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable, with group as the between-subjects variable and time as the within-subjects variable. The primary analysis was the group-by-time interaction. Results No significant group-by-time interactions were found for pain (F = 1.892, P = .447) or disability (F = 0.115, P = .736). The group-by-time interaction was statistically significant for right (F = 7.317, P = .008) and left (F = 9.525, P = .003) cervical rotation range of motion, with the patients who received the cervical thrust manipulation having experienced greater improvement in cervical rotation than those treated with Kinesio Tape (P<.01). No significant group-by-time interactions were found for cervical spine range of motion for flexion (F = 0.944, P = .334), extension (F = 0.122, P = .728), and right (F = 0.220, P = .650) and left (F = 0.389, P = .535) lateral flexion. Conclusion Patients with mechanical neck pain who received cervical thrust manipulation or Kinesio Taping exhibited similar reductions in neck pain intensity and disability and similar changes in active cervical range of motion, except for rotation. Changes in neck pain surpassed the minimal clinically important difference, whereas changes in disability did not. Changes in cervical range of motion were small and not clinically meaningful. Because we did not include a control or placebo group in this study, we cannot rule out a placebo effect or natural changes over time as potential reasons for the improvements measured in both groups. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(8):724–730, Epub 20 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4086
Tập 42 Số 8 - Trang 724-730 - 2012
Shoulder Pain and Mobility Deficits: Adhesive Capsulitis The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these clinical practice guidelines is to describe the peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43(5):A1–A31. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.0302
Tập 43 Số 5 - Trang A1-A31 - 2013
Frozen Shoulder: Evidence and a Proposed Model Guiding Rehabilitation
Tập 39 Số 2 - Trang 135-148 - 2009
The Effect of Anterior Versus Posterior Glide Joint Mobilization on External Rotation Range of Motion in Patients With Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis
Tập 37 Số 3 - Trang 88-99 - 2007
Effects of a Tendo-Achilles Lengthening Procedure on Muscle Function and Gait Characteristics in a Patient With Diabetes Mellitus
Tập 30 Số 2 - Trang 85-90 - 2000
The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' Consensus Rehabilitation Guideline for Arthroscopic Anterior Capsulolabral Repair of the Shoulder Synopsis This manuscript describes the consensus rehabilitation guideline developed by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. The purpose of this guideline is to facilitate clinical decision making during the rehabilitation of patients following arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair of the shoulder. This guideline is centered on the principle of the gradual application of stress to the healing capsulolabral repair through appropriate integration of range of motion, strengthening, and shoulder girdle stabilization exercises during rehabilitation and daily activities. Components of this guideline include a 0- to 4-week period of absolute immobilization, a staged recovery of full range of motion over a 3-month period, a strengthening progression beginning at postoperative week 6, and a functional progression for return to athletic or demanding work activities between postoperative months 4 and 6. This document represents the first consensus rehabilitation guideline developed by a multidisciplinary society of international rehabilitation professionals specifically for the postoperative care of patients following arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair of the shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(3):155–168. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3186
Tập 40 Số 3 - Trang 155-168 - 2010