Hernia

Background: The choice of approach to the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia is controversial. There is a scarcity of data comparing the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach with the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, and questions remain about their relative merits and risks. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify reports of trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP. In addition, selected conference proceedings were hand-searched, websites consulted, reference lists of all included papers were scanned, and experts contacted for other potentially eligible reports. All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP for inguinal hernia repair were eligible for inclusion. Large non-randomised prospective studies were also eligible for inclusion to provide further comparative evidence of complications and serious adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Statistical analyses were performed using the fixed effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The search identified one RCT which reported no statistically significant difference between TAPP and TEP when considering duration of operation, haematoma, length of stay, time to return to usual activities, and recurrence. The eight non-randomised studies suggest that TAPP is associated with higher rates of port-site hernias and visceral injuries whilst there appear to be more conversions with TEP. Vascular injuries and deep/mesh infections were rare and there was no obvious difference between the groups. No studies reporting economic evidence were identified. Conclusions: There is insufficient data to allow conclusions to be drawn about the relative effectiveness of TEP compared with TAPP. Efforts should be made to start and complete adequately-powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compare the different methods of laparoscopic repair.

To compare early postoperative outcomes after transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair with open (oTAR) and robotic (rTAR) approach. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify comparative studies until October 2020. A meta-analysis of postoperative short-term outcomes was performed including complications rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention (SSOPI), systemic complications, readmission, and reoperation rates as measure outcomes. Six retrospective studies were included in the analysis with a total of 831 patients who underwent rTAR (n = 237) and oTAR (n = 594). Robotic TAR was associated with lower risk of complications rate (9.3 vs 20.7%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.218–0.589, p < 0.001), lower risk of developing SSO (5.3 vs 11.5%, OR 0.669, 95% CI 0.307–1.458, p = 0.02), lower risk of developing systemic complications (6.3 vs 26.5%, OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.100–0.433, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD − 4.409, 95% CI − 6.000 to − 2.818, p < 0.001) but longer operative time (SMD 53.115, 95% CI 30.236–75.993, p < 0.01) compared with oTAR. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and reoperation rates. Robotic TAR improves recovery by adding the benefits of minimally invasive procedures when compared to open surgery. Although postoperative complications appear to decrease with a robotic approach, further studies are needed to support the real long-term and cost-effective advantages.

Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery is associated with little postoperative pain and a fast recovery, but is a technically demanding operative procedure. Apart from the surgeon’s expertise, patient characteristics and hernia-related variations may also affect the operative time and outcome. Patient-related factors predictive of perioperative complications, conversion to open anterior repair, and operative time were studied in a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEP hernia repair from 2005 to 2009. A total of 3,432 patients underwent TEP. The mean operative time was 26 min (SD ± 10.9), TEP was converted into an open anterior approach in 26 patients (0.8 %), and perioperative complications were observed in 55 (1.6 %) patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that a history of abdominal surgery (OR 1.76, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.01–3.06; p = 0.05), and the presence of a scrotal (OR 5.31, 1.20–23.43; p = 0.03) or bilateral hernia (OR 2.25, 1.25–4.06; p = 0.01) were independent predictive factors of perioperative complications. Female gender (OR 5.30. 1.52–18.45; p = 0.01), a history of abdominal surgery (OR 3.96, 1.72– 9.12; p = 0.001), and the presence of a scrotal hernia (OR 34.84, 10.42–116.51, p < 0.001) were predictive factors for conversion. A BMI ≥ 25 (effect size (ES) 1.78, 95 % confidence interval 1.09–2.47; p < 0.001) and the presence of a scrotal (ES 5.81, 1.93–9.68; p = 0.003), indirect (ES 2.78, 2.05– 3.50, p < 0.001) or bilateral hernia (ES 10.19, 9.20–11.08; p < 0.001) were associated with a longer operative time. Certain patient characteristics are, even in experienced TEP surgeons, associated with an increased risk of conversion and complications and a longer operative time. For the surgeon gaining experience with TEP, it seems advisable to select relatively young and slender male patients with a unilateral (non-scrotal) hernia and no previous abdominal surgery to enhance patient safety and ‘surgeon comfort’.

Inguinal hernia is a common feature of decompensated liver cirrhosis and a frequent cause of life-threatening complications. The traditional treatment of inguinal hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis includes non-operative management; however, emerging data suggest elective surgical repair as a preferable approach. Therefore, we aimed to assess the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis and describe their clinical characteristics. In this retrospective study, we included a total of 28 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent inguinal hernia repair between March 2000 and May 2019 at the First People’s Hospital of Xiaoshan, Hangzhou, China. We also reviewed the literature on inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis. Emergency surgery for complicated hernia was performed in 17.9% of the study patients. Two patients developed major complications including wound hematoma in 1, who required reoperation, and gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in the other patient, who required blood transfusion. Further, minor complications developed in 6 patients, including wound seroma in 1 and scrotal swelling in 5. Emergency hernia repair was found to be associated with a higher complication rate than elective surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Elective surgery for inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis appears to be successful and might be associated with a lower complication rate than emergency surgery. Inguinal hernia repair is recommended for patients with liver cirrhosis to prevent the development of life-threatening complications.

Herniation following Pfannenstiel incision is rare. Closure of the incision in four layers including the rectii abdominis, is done uncommonly. The authors report five cases of interstitial herniae between the rectus muscles and the anterior rectus sheath, incarcerating omentum and bowel. Four patients underwent repair, two as an emergency. One patient was managed conservatively. Subsequently all consultant and specialist registrars in obstetrics and gynaecology in the Wessex region were sent questionnaires on their methods of closure of Pfannenstiel incisions and rates of associated herniae. Fifty-three of 74 surgeons responded and only three (5.6 %) routinely closed the abdominal recti. The surveyed surgeons felt post-Pfannenstiel incisional hernia rates were low (0-1 %) though the rate was unknown to 33 % of surgeons. Complex incisional interstitial herniae of this type have not previously been described. Closure of the rectii abdominis (as originally described by Pfannenstiel in 1900) could minimise the incidence of incisional herniae.

The diagnosis of strangulation within an incarcerated abdominal-wall hernia is not always possible preoperatively. In approximately 1% of cases of incarcerated hernias, a strangulated viscus will reduce spontaneously following administration of muscle relaxants during induction of anaesthesia, and the surgeon has to perform an exploratory laparotomy. The aim of this study was to report the use of hernioscopy to inspect intra-abdominal contents and thus prevent unnecessary laparotomy. The case notes of all patients undergoing hernioscopy for incarcerated hernias that reduced spontaneously during induction of anaesthesia, skin incision, or prior to evaluation of sac contents were reviewed. Hernioscopy is performed following insertion of a 10-mm port through the hernia sac. Standard insufflation with carbon dioxide is performed, maintaining an intra-abdominal pressure of 10–12 mmHg following which the laparoscope is inserted and a diagnostic examination performed. Following completion of hernioscopy, the laparoscope is withdrawn, the pneumoperitoneum released, and the hernia repaired in a conventional manner using a tension-free technique. Five patients underwent hernioscopy for the evaluation of incarcerated hernias that had reduced spontaneously prior to inspection of sac contents. There were four men with indirect inguinal hernias and one woman with an incarcerated femoral hernia. The hernioscopy of the four men was unremarkable and they went home the following day. The female patient had blood within the peritoneal cavity arising from the upper abdomen and underwent laparotomy and splenectomy. She made an unremarkable recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 7. Hernioscopy is a simple and useful technique that can be performed by surgeons familiar with laparoscopic procedures such as appendicectomy and cholecystectomy.

Contaminated large abdominal wall defects can pose a formidable challenge to the surgeon. This study compared the outcome of components separation (CS) for complex ventral defects with or without contamination. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent CS over an 8-year period. Pre-operative factors such as the presence/absence of contamination were analyzed for their effect on length of hospitalization, readmission rate, post-operative complications, re-intervention rate, and long-term recurrence. A total of 34 patients was analyzed. There were 18 males (53%) with a mean age of 57 years. Mean body mass index was 31 kg/m2. Seventeen patients (50%) had prior repair (mean 2.1 repairs per patient, median 2). Mean size of abdominal defect was 255 cm2. Out of the 34 patients, 13 had infected or contaminated defects, including 5 patients with infected mesh. Length of stay was longer in the contaminated group (11.1 vs 3.1 days, P < 0.01). A higher complication rate was noted in the setting of contamination (77 vs 38%, P = 0.03). During a mean follow-up of 47 months, no difference was noted in the re-intervention rate (38 vs 29%, P = 0.70) or long-term recurrence rate of the defect (8 vs 5%, P = 1.0) (contaminated vs non-contaminated group, respectively). CS is a good option for closure of large contaminated complex abdominal wall defects. Despite an increased risk of postoperative complications and longer hospitalization length, long-term outcomes are favorable.