European Spine Journal

Formation of terminal complement complex (TCC), a downstream complement system activation product inducing inflammatory processes and cell lysis, has been identified in degenerated discs. However, it remains unclear which molecular factors regulate complement activation during disc degeneration (DD). This study investigated a possible involvement of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and the lysosomal protease cathepsin D (CTSD). Disc biopsies were collected from patients suffering from DD (n = 43) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS, n = 13). Standardized tissue punches and isolated cells from nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF) and endplate (EP) were stimulated with 5% human serum (HS) alone or in combination with IL-1β, CTSD or zymosan. TCC formation and modulation by the complement regulatory proteins CD46, CD55 and CD59 were analysed. In DD tissue cultures, IL-1β stimulation decreased the percentage of TCC + cells in AF and EP (P < 0.05), whereas CTSD stimulation significantly increased TCC deposition in NP (P < 0.01) and zymosan in EP (P < 0.05). Overall, the expression of CD46, CD55 and CD59 significantly increased in all isolated cells during culture (P < 0.05). Moreover, cellular TCC deposition was HS concentration dependent but unaffected by IL-1β, CTSD or zymosan. These results suggest a functional relevance of IL-1β and CTSD in modulating TCC formation in DD, with differences between tissue regions. Although strong TCC deposition may represent a degeneration-associated event, IL-1β may inhibit it. In contrast, TCC formation was shown to be triggered by CTSD, indicating a multifunctional involvement in disc pathophysiology.

The goal of our efforts was to develop a modified drill that allows a safe milling of the dorsal osteophytes located close to the dura. Usually a normal high-speed drill is used for the resection of uncarthrotic and spondylophytic bone. In one patient, we used our new high-speed drill close to the dura in an area, which is not easy reachable with a normal drill or a rongeur. Employing the new drill with a polished tip, the spine surgeon is able to overcome the anatomical restrictions, which he has to face when the anterior approach to the cervical spine. The resection of dorsal osteophytes is easy and safe. The newly developed drill with the polished tip is a safe and high-quality alternative to conventional drills. Further investigations have to be done, to proof the advantages of the new drill.

Sacral insufficiency fractures can cause severe, debilitating pain to patients concerned. The incidence of this fracture type correlates with the appearance of osteoporosis in the elderly population. A polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement injection procedure called sacroplasty has been recently described as an optional method for the treatment of this fracture type. However, the correct cement placement in the complex anatomical structure of the sacrum is a surgical challenge. The aim of the study is to compare the precision, safety, and radiation exposure of standard multiplanar fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) guidance for PMMA application to the sacrum using both balloon-assisted sacroplasty and conventional sacroplasty. A controlled experimental investigation in a human cadaver trial has been performed. Two imaging and two application modalities to monitor percutaneous PMMA injection to the sacrum were examined. The application forms were randomized from side to side of the pelvis. We found less cement extravasation in the CT-guided groups, but also a significant higher radiation exposure (P < 0.05) by using CT guidance. The conventional fluoroscopy-guided sacroplasty revealed the shortest procedure time (incision to closure time) of all treatment groups (P < 0.01). These findings show no difference regarding cement extravasation between ballon-assisted and conventional sacroplasty. Further, in comparison to fluoroscopy-assisted technique, the CT-guided cement injection seems to decrease the risk of cement extravasation, irrespective of the use of an additional balloon assistance. However, we have to consider a greater radiation exposure using CT guidance. Further investigations will proof the suitability in the normal course of clinical life.

To clarify the relationship between sarcopenia and spinopelvic parameters. Among outpatients of spine surgery department, 126 patients (mean age 77.2 years. M/F = 71/55) were included. We diagnosed patients with sarcopenia using the diagnostic algorithm of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Spinopelvic parameters and the prevalence of spinopelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ≥ 10°) were investigated and compared between patients with and without sarcopenia. Furthermore, we compared the spinopelvic parameters between the Sarcopenia and No Sarcopenia groups under each condition of spinopelvic match and mismatch. The prevalence of sarcopenia in this study was 21.4%. Overall, the spinopelvic parameters except thoracic kyphosis (TK) (Sarcopenia: 34.7°, No Sarcopenia: 24.3°, p < 0.01) were not significantly different between the Sarcopenia and No Sarcopenia groups. Prevalence of patients with spinopelvic mismatch was also not significantly different between the Sarcopenia and No Sarcopenia groups (37.0% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.66). Among patients without spinopelvic mismatch, there was no spinopelvic parameter with a significant difference between the 2 groups. However, among patients with spinopelvic mismatch, sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) (115.7 mm vs. 58.7 mm, p < 0.01) and TK (36.6° vs. 21.3°, p < 0.01) of the Sarcopenia group were significantly larger than those of the No Sarcopenia group. Moreover, sarcopenia was independently related to a significant increase in SVA (β = 50.7, p < 0.01) and TK (β = 14.0, p < 0.01) in patients with spinopelvic mismatch, after adjustment for age. Sarcopenia is related to spinal sagittal imbalance because of insufficient compensation by flattening thoracic kyphosis in patients with spinopelvic mismatch. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This study was aimed to identify correlation between maximum isometric strength in five muscle groups determined by dynamometry results of muscle tests and the inclination angles of the spine. This predictive correlational study included 63 young healthy athletes aged 10–15. (m/f 31/32; 12.73 ± 1.58 years; 162.57 ± 12.94 cm; 52.86 ± 12.17 kg; 3.95 ± 1.70 training years; 4.05 ± 1.31 training h/week).The maximum isometric strength in five muscle groups was measured by a handheld dynamometer with external belt fixation using a portable stabilization device. The inclination angles were measured with a digital inclinometer. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and correlations were estimated by Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). The isometric muscular strength of the muscle group of the hip extensors was in a significant correlation with the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), r = 0.714 (p < 0.0001). The isometric muscular strength of the muscle group of the erector spinae was in a significant correlation with the LLA, r = 0.578 (p < 0.0001) and with thoracic kyphosis angle (TKA), r = 0.522 (p < 0.0001). There is a strong association between isometric strength of the muscle groups of the hip extensors and erector spinae and the inclination angles of the spine. Based on the isometric results, physical therapy can be proposed for increasing the muscular strength of those muscle groups, which can help in the prevention of more severe forms of postural deformities. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases of lumbo-sacral or sacral metastases presenting with compression of the cauda equina who underwent urgent surgery at our institution. Our objective was to report our experience on the clinical presentation, management and finally the surgical outcome of this cohort of patients. We reviewed medical notes and images of all patients with compression of the cauda equina as a result of lumbo-sacral or sacral metastases during the study period (2004–2011). The collected clinical data consisted of time of onset of symptoms, neurology (Frankel grade), ambulatory status and continence. Operative data analysed were details of surgical procedure and complications. Post-operatively, we reviewed neurological outcome, ambulation, continence, destination of discharge and survival. During the 8-year study period, 20 patients [11 males, 9 females; mean age 61.8 years (29–87)] had received urgent surgery for metastatic spinal cauda compression caused by lumbo-sacral or sacral metastases. The majority of patients presented with symptoms of pain and neurological deterioration (n = 14) with onset of pain considerably longer than neurology symptoms [197 days (3–1,825) vs. 46 days (1–540)]; all patients were Frankel C (n = 2, both non-ambulatory), D (n = 13) or E (n = 5) at presentation and three patients were incontinent of urine. Operative procedures performed were posterior decompression with (out) fusion (n = 12), posterior decompression with sacroplasty (n = 1), decompression with lumbo-pelvic stabilisation with (out) kyphoplasty/sacroplasty (n = 7) and posterior decompression/reconstruction with anterior corpectomy/stabilisation (n = 2). Post-operatively, 5/20 (20 %) patients improved one Frankel grade, 1/20 (5 %) improved two grades, 13/20 (65 %) remained stable (8 D, 5 E) and 1/20 (5 %) deteriorated. All patients were ambulatory and 19/20 were continent on discharge. The mean length of stay was 7 days (4–22). There were 6/20 (30 %) complications: three major (PE, deep wound infection, implant failure) and three minor (superficial wound infection, incidental durotomy, chest infection). All patients returned back to their own home (n = 14/20, 70 %) or a nursing home (n = 6/20, 35 %). Thirteen patients are deceased (mean survival 367 days (120–603) and seven are still alive [mean survival 719 days (160–1,719)]. Surgical intervention for MSCC involving the lumbo-sacral junction or sacral spine has a high but acceptable complication rate (6/20, 30 %), and can be important in restoring/preserving neurological function, assisting with ambulatory function and allowing patients to return to their previous residence.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used. After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (β:€−32; 95 %CI: −54 to −10) and healthcare costs (β:€−126; 95 %CI: −235 to −32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (β:€186; 95 %CI:19–557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (β:€−96; 95 %CI:−1975–2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being cost-effective in comparison with PT was low (≤0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of cost-effectiveness. From a societal perspective, MTU was not cost-effective in comparison with PT in patients with sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain for perceived recovery, functional status, and QALYs. As no clear total societal cost and effect differences were found between MTU and PT, the decision about what intervention to administer, reimburse, and/or implement can be based on the preferences of the patient and the decision-maker at hand. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843