
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
SCOPUS (1957-2023)SCIE-ISI
1399-6576
0001-5172
Đan mạch
Cơ quản chủ quản: WILEY , Blackwell Munksgaard
Các bài báo tiêu biểu
Postoperative cognitive function (POCD) has been subject to extensive research. In the literature, large differences are apparent in methodology such as the test batteries, the interval between sessions, the endpoints to be analysed, statistical methods, and how neuropsychological deficits are defined. Traditionally, intelligence tests or tests developed for clinical neuropsychology have been used. The tests for detecting POCD should be based on well‐described sensitivity and suitability in relation to surgical patients. In tests using scores, floor/ceiling effects may compromise the evaluation if the tests are either too easy or to difficult. Uncontrolled testing facilities and change of test personnel may affect the test performance. Practice effects are pronounced in neuropsychological tests but have generally been ignored. The use of a suitable normative population is essential to allow correction for practice effects and variability between sessions. Missing follow‐up may severely compromise valid conclusions since subjects unable or unwilling to be examined are particularly prone to suffer from POCD. In the statistical analysis of the test results, the evaluation should be based on differences between pre‐ and postoperative performance. Parametric statistical tests are not relevant unless the appropriate Gaussian distributions are present, perhaps after transformation of data. The definition of cognitive dysfunction should be restrictive and the criteria should be fulfilled in only a small proportion of volunteers. In the literature, these requirements often have not been fulfilled. This precludes a reasonable estimation of the incidence of POCD and the conclusions of comparative studies should be interpreted with great caution. In this review article, we present a number of recommendations for the design and execution of studies within this area. In addition, the critical reader may use these recommendations in the evaluation of the literature.
The laparoscopic operating technique is being applied increasingly to a variety of intra‐abdominal operations. Intra–abdominal gas insufflation, i.e. pneumoperitoneum (PP), is then used to allow surgical access. The haemodynamic effects of PP in combination with different body positions have not been fully examined. Eleven patients without signs of cardiopulmonary disease were studied before and during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under propofol–fentanyl anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Swan‐Ganz and radial arterial catheterization were used to determine haemodynamic data in the horizontal position, with a 15–20° head–down tilt and a 15–20° head–up tilt. The measurements were repeated after insufflation of carbon dioxide to an intraabdominal pressure of 11–13 mmHg, as well as during surgery. The ventricular filling pressures of the heart were strictly dependent on body position. PP in the horizontal position increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by 32% (
No significant differences in pain at rest or during mobilization, or in side‐effects, were observed between groups.
Among 873 consecutive patients who had undergone a total of 1021 spinal anaesthesias involving puncture of the lumbar dura, 75 (7.35%) complained of Postdural Puncture headache. (PDPH). The severity of each patient's PDPH was categorized, on a scale from mild to severe, on the basis of the onset, duration, severity of the heActa ches, and the degree to which they were accompained by auditory and vestibular symptoms. In the patients who developed PDPH, 65% developed symptoms within 24 hours of the lumbar punctures and 92% developed symptoms within 48 hours.
For the patients who recovered spontaneously the mean duration of the PDPHs was 5 days, with a range of 1–12 days. PDPH was characterized by headachches that were influenced by the patient's posture and the severity of PDPH was categorized as follows:
Fortyfive of the PDPH patients (60%) recovered spontaneously. Of these, 8 patients (11%) were categorized as mild cases of PDPH, 14 (19%) as moderate, and 23 (30%) patients as severe cases of PDPH. Thirty of the PDPH patients (40%) were treated with an autologous epidural bloodpatch (AEBP). Of these, 27 patients (36%) were classified as severe and 3 patients (4%) as moderate PDPH.
Fifty‐five patients with pain associated with cancer were selected for long‐term treatment with epidural morphine. Patients who had more than one type of pain within the same region were specially analysed concerning differential analgesic effects of the treatment, i. e. the patients served as their own control. Twenty‐eight of the 55 patients became pain free. In 21 patients alleviation of pain was complete only for one or two of several types of pain within the same area with a certain dose of epidural morphine. In six patients the treatment failed. An analysis revealed that the best response was obtained when the pain was continuous and originated from deep somatic structures. In co‐existing continuous visceral pain or intermittent somatic pain originating e. g. from a pathological fracture, the outcome of the treatment was variable. Cutaneous pain, pain classified as neurogenic, and intermittent pain due to intestinal obstruction was only occasionally relieved. Ten of the patients had co‐existing pain of non‐malignant origin and none of them was helped for that pain. The variable response to epidural morphine may indicate that different types of pain‐producing stimuli engage different kinds of receptors which differ in affinity to morphine in the spinal fluid; it is also possible that some pain‐mediating systems are non‐responsive to opiates.