kOBCS©: a novel software calculator program of the Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale (OBCS)
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.
Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaens M-R, Van Limbergen E, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):412–9.
Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–16.
Christie DRH, O’Brien MY, Christie JA, Kron T, Ferguson SA, Hamilton CS, et al. A comparison of methods of cosmetic assessment in breast conservation treatment. Breast. 1996;5(5):358–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(96)90004-1 .
Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JH, Jager JJ, et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC “boost vs. no boost” trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55(3):219–32.
Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1505–9.
Triedman SA, Osteen R, Harris JR. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome of conservative surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Surg Clin N Am. 1990;70(4):901–16.
Vrieling C, Collette L, Bartelink E, Borger JH, Brenninkmeyer SJ, Horiot JC, et al. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(3):667–76.
Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Vrieling C, MacMillan D, Rainsbury D, Heil J, et al. Recommendations for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:629–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8.2012Oct;135(3):629-37 .
Cardoso MJ, Oliveira H, Cardoso J. Assessing cosmetic results after breast conserving surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(1):37–44.
Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(2):257–61.
Beadle GF, Come S, Henderson IC, Silver B, Hellman S, Harris JR. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the cosmetic results after primary radiation treatment for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10(11):2131–7.
Kaija H, Rauni S, Jorma I, Matti H. Consistency of patient- and doctor-assessed cosmetic outcome after conservative treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;45(3):225–8.
Van Limbergen E, van der Schueren E, Van Tongelen K. Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. Radiother Oncol. 1989;16(3):159–67.
Soror T, Kovács G, Seibold N, Melchert C, Baumann K, Wenzel E, et al. Cosmetic changes following surgery and accelerated partial breast irradiation using HDR interstitial brachytherapy. Strahlentherapie Onkol. 2017;193(5):367–74.
Racz JM, Hong NL, Latosinsky S. In search of a gold standard scoring system for the subjective evaluation of cosmetic outcomes following breast-conserving therapy. Breast J. 2015;21(4):345–51.
Chen Z, Ning R. Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional? Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(14):2217–28.
Hussain Z, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH, García-Fiñana M, Percy D. Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol. 1999;72(855):236–45.
Moyer HR, Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Losken A. Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(2):227–32.
Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, Wöhnl A, Blaschke M, et al. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(3):229–36.
Fitzal F, Krois W, Trischler H, Wutzel L, Riedl O, Kühbelböck U, et al. The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. Breast. 2007;16(4):429–35.
Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR, Vora N, Desai KR, Archambeau JO, et al. Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985;11(3):575–8.
Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ. Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40(2):115–26.
Soror T, Kovács G, Kovács Á, Seibold N, Melchert C, Baumann K, et al. New objective method in reporting the breast cosmesis after breast-conservative treatment based on nonstandardized photographs: the Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale. Brachytherapy. 2016;15(5):631–6.