Zeuthen–Hicks Bargaining in Electronic Negotiations
Tóm tắt
We apply the Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining model in an empirical study of electronic negotiations. Using a typology of bargaining steps based on that model, we study to what extent actual steps conform to the predictions of the model, and the effects of conformity with the model on bargaining outcomes. Results indicate that the model predicts bargaining steps only slightly better than chance, but that steps conforming to the model lead to outcomes that are closer to the efficient frontier, closer to the Nash bargaining solution, and provide higher utility to the party using such steps.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bishop RL (1964) A Zeuthen–Hicks theory of bargaining. Econometrica 32:410–417
Bognanno MF, Dworkin JBC (1975) Who “wins” in wage bargaining? Comment. Ind Labor Relat Rev 28(4):570–572
Bowlby RL, Schriver WRC (1978) Bluffing and the “split-the-difference” theory of wage bargaining. Ind Labor Relat Rev 31(2):161–171
Brooks JM, Dor A, Wong HS (1997) Hospital-insurer bargaining: an empirical investigation of appendectomy pricing. J Health Econ 16(4):417–434
Brooks JM, Doucette W, Sorofman B (1999) Factors affecting bargaining outcomes between pharmacies and insurers. Health Serv Res 34(1 Pt 2):439–451
Chambers CP, Echenique F (2014) On the consistency of data with bargaining theories. Theor Econ 9(1):137–162
Dias L, Vetschera R (2018) Multiple local optima in Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining: an analysis of different preference models. EURO J Decis Processes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-018-0089-0
Fandel G (1985) On the applicability of group decision-making concepts to wage bargaining. In: Haimes YY, Chankong V (eds) Decision making with multiple objectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 532–548
Filzmoser M, Vetschera R (2008) A classification of bargaining steps and their impact on negotiation outcomes. Group Decis Negot 17(5):421–443
Hamermesh DS (1973) Who “wins” in wage bargaining? ILR Rev 26(4):1146–1149
Harsanyi JC (1956) Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: a critical discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’, and Nash’s theories. Econometrica 24(2):144–157
Hindriks K, Jonker CM, Tykhonov D (2007) Negotiation dynamics: analysis, concession tactics, and outcomes. In: Lin TYT, Bradshaw JM, Klusch M, Zhang C, Broder A, Ho H (eds) Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 427–433
Kersten G, Noronha S (1999) WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use. Decis Support Syst 25(2):135–154
Kersten GE, Gimon D, Vahidov R (2012) Concession patterns in multi-issue negotiations and reverse auctions. In: Kauffman RJ (ed) International conference on electronic commerce, ICEC 2012, Singapore, pp 127–133
Lewicki RJ, Weiss SE, Lewin D (1992) Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: a review and synthesis. J Organ Behav 13(3):209–252
Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Croux C, Todorov V, Ruckstuhl A, Salibian-Barrera M, Verbeke T, Koller M, Conceicao E, di Palma MA (2018) robustbase: basic robust statistics R package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=robustbase. Accessed 13 Nov 2018
Maude-Griffin R, Feldman R, Wholey D (2004) Nash bargaining model of HMO premiums. Appl Econ 36(12):1329–1336
Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162
Oliva TA, Leap TL (1981) A typology of metamodels in collective bargaining. Behav Sci 26(4):337–345
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 23 July 2018
Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T, Kersten G (2017) Can the holistic preference elicitation be used to determine an accurate negotiation offer scoring system? A comparison of direct rating and UTASTAR techniques. In: Schoop M, Kilgour DM (eds) Group decision and negotiation—a socio-technical perspective. Lecture notes in business information processing, LNBIP, vol 293. Springer, Berlin, pp 202–214
Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109
Svejnar J (1980) On the empirical testing of the Nash–Zeuthen bargaining solution. Ind Labor Relat Rev 33(4):536–542
Svejnar J (1986) Bargaining power, fear of disagreement, and wage settlements: theory and evidence from U.S. industry. Econometrica 54(5):1055–1078
Vetschera R (2013) Negotiation processes: an integrated perspective. Eur J Decis Processes 1(1–2):135–164
Zeuthen F (1930) Problems of monopoly and economic warfare. Routledge, London