Zebra finches and Dutch adults exhibit the same cue weighting bias in vowel perception
Tóm tắt
Vocal tract resonances, called formants, are the most important parameters in human speech production and perception. They encode linguistic meaning and have been shown to be perceived by a wide range of species. Songbirds are also sensitive to different formant patterns in human speech. They can categorize words differing only in their vowels based on the formant patterns independent of speaker identity in a way comparable to humans. These results indicate that speech perception mechanisms are more similar between songbirds and humans than realized before. One of the major questions regarding formant perception concerns the weighting of different formants in the speech signal (“acoustic cue weighting”) and whether this process is unique to humans. Using an operant Go/NoGo design, we trained zebra finches to discriminate syllables, whose vowels differed in their first three formants. When subsequently tested with novel vowels, similar in either their first formant or their second and third formants to the familiar vowels, similarity in the higher formants was weighted much more strongly than similarity in the lower formant. Thus, zebra finches indeed exhibit a cue weighting bias. Interestingly, we also found that Dutch speakers when tested with the same paradigm exhibit the same cue weighting bias. This, together with earlier findings, supports the hypothesis that human speech evolution might have exploited general properties of the vertebrate auditory system.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson SR (2008) The logical structure of linguistic theory. Language 84:795–814
Boersma P (2001) PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int 5:341–345
Curtin S, Fennell C, Escudero P (2009) Weighting of vowel cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning. Dev Sci 12:725–731
Dooling RJ (2004) Audition: can birds hear everything they sing? In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (eds) Nature’s music. The science of birdsong. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 206–225
Dooling RJ, Brown SD (1990) Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels. Percept Psychophys 47:568–574
Dooling RJ, Okanoya K, Brown SD (1989) Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction. Percept Psychophys 46:65–71
Dooling RJ, Best CT, Brown SD (1995) Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave /ra-la/ continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J Acoust Soc Am 97:1839–1846
Eriksson JL, Villa AEP (2006) Learning of auditory equivalence classes for vowels by rats. Behav Process 73:348–359
Escudero P, Benders T, Lipski SC (2009) Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: the case of Dutch, German and Spanish listeners. J Phonetics 37:452–465
Fitch WT (2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fowler CA, Saltzman E (1993) Coordination and coarticulation in speech production. Lang Speech 36:171–195
Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–1579
Hienz RD, Aleszczyk CM, May BJ (1996) Vowel discrimination in cats: acquisition, effects of stimulus level and performance in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3656–3668
Kluender KR, Diehl RL, Killeen PR (1987) Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science 237:1195–1197
Kuhl PK, Miller JD (1975) Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosives. Science 190:69–72
Kuhl PK, Miller JD (1978) Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 63:905–917
Lacerda F (1993) Sonority contrasts dominate young infants’ vowel perception. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2372
Lacerda F (1994) The asymmetric structure of the infant’s perceptual vowel space. J Acoust Soc Am 95:3016
Lachlan RF, Peters S, Verhagen SL, ten Cate C (2010) Are there species-universal categories in bird song phonology and syntax? a comparative study of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), and swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana)? J Comp Psychol 124:92–108
Ladefoged P (2006) A course in phonetics. Thomson Wadsworth, Boston
Liberman AM (1982) On finding that speech is special. Am Psychol 37:148–167
Lieberman P (1975) On the origins of language. An introduction to the evolution of human speech. Macmillan, New York
Lohr B, Dooling RJ (1998) Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Comp Psychol 112:36–47
Mayo C, Turk A (2004) Adult-child differences in acoustic cue weighting are influenced by segmental context: children are not always perceptually biased toward transitions. J Acoust Soc Am 115:3184–3194
Mayo C, Scobbie JM, Hewlett N, Waters D (2003) The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children’s speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 46:1184–1196
Nittrouer S (1996) The relation between speech perception and phonemic awareness: evidence from low-SES children and children with chronic OM. J Speech Hear Res 39:1059–1070
Nittrouer S, Lowenstein JH (2009) Does harmonicity explain children’s cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables? J Acoust Soc Am 125:1679–1692
Ohms VR, Gill A, van Heijningen CAA, Beckers GJL, ten Cate C (2010a) Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech. Proc R Soc B 277:1003–1009
Ohms VR, Snelderwaard PC, ten Cate C, Beckers GJL (2010b) Vocal tract articulation in zebra finches. PLoS One 5:e11923
Pinker S, Jackendoff R (2005) The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95:201–236
Sokal RR, Rolf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman and Company, New York
Titze IR (2000) Principles of voice production. National Centre for Voice and Speech, Iowa City
Ylinen S, Uther M, Latvala A, Vepsäläinen S, Iverson P, Akahane-Yamada R, Näätänen R (2009) Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of english. J Cogn Neurosci 22:1319–1332