Young and older adult pedestrians’ behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars

Accident Analysis & Prevention - Tập 159 - Trang 106256 - 2021
Aurélie Dommes1, Gaëtan Merlhiot1, Régis Lobjois1, Nguyen-Thong Dang1, Fabrice Vienne1, Joris Boulo2, Anne-Hélène Oliver2, Armel Crétual2, Viola Cavallo1
1University Gustave Eiffel, PICS-L, F-78000 Versailles, France
2University Rennes 2, Inria, M2S - EA 7470, Rennes, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackermann, 2019, Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 62, 757, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.006 Avineri, 2012, Pedestrians’ behaviour in cross walks: the effects of fear of falling and age, Accid. Anal. Prev., 44, 30, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.028 Botello, 2019, Planning for walking and cycling in anautonomous-vehicle future, Transport. Res. Interdiscipl. Perspect., 1, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100012 Cavallo, 2019, A street-crossing simulator for studying and training pedestrians, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 61, 217, 10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.012 Currano, R., Park, S. Y., Domingo, L., Garcia-Mancilla, J., Santana-Mancilla, P. C., Gonzalez, V. M., & Ju, W. (2018). ¡Vamos! Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI ’18, 210–220. Deb, 2018, Pedestrians receptivity in autonomous vehicles: exploring a video-based assessment, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annu. Meet., 62, 2061, 10.1177/1541931218621465 Deb, 2017, Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles, Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 84, 178, 10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.029 Dey, 2019, Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behavior, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 65, 191, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.027 Dommes, 2019, Street-crossing workload in young and older pedestrians, Accident Anal. Prevent., 128, 175, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.018 Dommes, 2014, Crossing a two-way street: comparison of young and old pedestrians, J. Saf. Res., 50, 27, 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.03.008 Dommes, 2013, Functional declines as predictors of risky street-crossing decisions in older pedestrians, Accid. Anal. Prev., 59, 135, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.017 Dommes, 2015, Towards an explanation of age-related difficulties in crossing a two-way street, Accid. Anal. Prev., 85, 229, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.022 Fontaine, 1997, Fatal pedestrian accident in France: a typological analysis, Accid. Anal. Prev., 29, 303, 10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00084-X Jayaraman, 2019, Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior, Front. Robot. AI, 10.3389/frobt.2019.00117 Habibovic, 2016, Evaluating Interactions with N on-existing Automated Vehicles: Three Wizard of Oz Approaches Hochman, 2020, Pedestrians' understanding of a fully autonomous vehicle's intent to stop: a learning effect over time, Front. Psychol., 11, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585280 Hulse, 2018, Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: relationships with road users, risk, gender and age, Saf. Sci., 102, 1, 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001 Katz, 1975, An experimental study of driver and pedestrian interaction during the crossing conflict, Hum. Factors, 17, 514, 10.1177/001872087501700510 Lagström, T., & Lundgren, V. M. (2015). AVIP - Autonomous vehicles in interaction with pedestrians, Master’s thesis, Chalmers University ofTechnology, Gothenborg, Sweden, 2015. Lee, Y.M., Madigan, R., Uzondu, C., Garcia, J., Romano, R., Markkula, G., & Merat, N. (in press). Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrians' crossing behaviour. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2xub4 ; Retrievd at https://psyarxiv.com/2xub4/. Lobjois, 2007, Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: the effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task, Accid. Anal. Prev., 39, 934, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.013 Lobjois, 2009, The effects of aging on street-crossing behavior: from estimation to actual crossing, Accid. Anal. Prev., 41, 259, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.001 Madigan, 2019, Understanding interactions between automated road transport systems and other road users: a video analysis, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 66, 196, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006 Merat, 2018, What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?, Accid. Anal. Prev., 118, 244, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018 Millard-Ball, 2018, Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities, J. Plann. Educ. Res., 38, 6, 10.1177/0739456X16675674 Morris, 2017, Electrodermal response and automation trust during simulated self-driving car use, Vol. 61(1, 1759 NHTSA (2017). Traffic Safety Facts 2015. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Washington. doi: DOT HS 812 409. Norman, 2013 Nunes Velasco, 2019, Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality, Transport. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 66, 1, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015 Oxley, 2005, Crossing roads safely: an experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians, Accid. Anal. Prev., 37, 962, 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.017 Penmetsa, 2019, Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles – A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 143, 9, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010 Petzoldt, 2014, On the relationship between pedestrian gap acceptance and time to arrival estimates, Accid. Anal. Prev., 72, 127, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.019 Rahman, 2019, How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 65, 242, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.002 Rasouli, 2018, Are they going to cross? A benchmark dataset and baseline for pedestrian crosswalk behavior Razmi Rad, 2020, Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modelling, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 69, 101, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.014 Rodriguez, 2017 Rodríguez Palmeiro, 2018, Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: a Wizard of Oz experiment, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 58, 1005, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.020 Rothenbucher, D., Li, J., Sirkin, D., Mok, B., & Ju, W. (2016). Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2016, 795–802. Schieben, 2019, Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations, Cogn. Technol. Work, 21, 69, 10.1007/s10111-018-0521-z Schiff, 1992, Aging person’s estimates of vehicular motion, Psychol. Aging, 7, 518, 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.518 Scialfa, 1991, Age differ-ences in estimating vehicle velocity, Psychol. Aging, 6, 60, 10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.60 Sparrow, 2017, When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport, Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 80, 206, 10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014 Tapiro, 2016, Where do older pedestrians glance before deciding to cross a simulated two-lane road? A pedestrian simulator paradigm, 60, 11 Van Brummelen, 2018, Autonomous vehicle perception: The technology of today and tomorrow, Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 89, 384, 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.012 Visnovcova, 2013, Heart rate variability and electrodermal activity as noninvasive indices of sympathovagal balance in response to stress, Acta Med. Martin., 13, 5 Woodman, 2019, Gap acceptance study of pedestrians crossing between platooning autonomous vehicles in a virtual environment, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 67, 1, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.017 Zito, 2015, Street crossing behavior in younger and older pedestrians: an eye- and head-tracking study, BMC Geriatr., 15, 176, 10.1186/s12877-015-0175-0