Yield potential determines Australian wheat growers’ capacity to close yield gaps while mitigating economic risk
Tóm tắt
Australia’s farmers are among the most efficient in the world, despite a relatively large gap between potential and achieved water-limited grain yield. With wheat yield gaps typically > 1.7 t/ha or 50% of the water-limited yield, it is important to investigate the degree to which this gap may be attributable to (rational) subprofit-maximising input levels in response to risk and risk aversion in many major grain-growing regions, particularly those with lower and more variable rainfall. Here, we use a set of 14 case study sites across the Australian wheatbelt to examine the risk-return profile of several agronomic management practices and show the extent to which the farmers’ risk attitude determines their decision-making. Using a novel profit-risk-utility framework that incorporates crop simulation, probability theory, finance techniques and risk-aversion analysis, we were able to better demonstrate how farmers might select practices that manage economic risk across sites ranging from low to high rainfall. Results varied with risk preference and yield potential. However, there are real opportunities to close the yield gap by adopting non-limiting or near non-limiting nitrogen fertiliser practices and controlling fallow weeds. We show for the first time that yields associated with current best practice can be surpassed for most levels of risk aversion by adopting an emergent practice of optimising the site-specific time of sowing and matching variety to time of sowing. For some sites and risk profiles, the emerging best practice package which includes additional N fertiliser is also profitable under risk. We also propose a modified integrated framework for yield gaps. Here, we distinguish allocative input constrains due to risk aversion from those due to access to resources, and we account for an innovation gap where the current agronomic frontier is shifted upwards by growers successfully, implementing new technologies that are not yet part of current best practice.
Tài liệu tham khảo
ABARES (2014) Agricultural commodity statistics 2014, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, December, Canberra. http\\:agriculture.gov.au/abares/publications. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
Anderson E, Monjardino M (2019) Contract design in agriculture supply chains with random yield. Eur J Op Res 277:1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.041
Antle JM (1987) Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. Am J Agric Econ 69(3):509. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241687
Bowman MS, Zilberman D (2013) Economic factors affecting diversified farming systems. Ecol Soc 18:33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05574-180133
Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT, Yang HS (2003) Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:315–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.040202.122858
Chavas JP, Shi G (2015) An economic analysis of risk, management and agricultural technology. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 40:63
Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. In: Second Ed. Springer, New York
DAFWA (2015) Gross margins. WA Department of Agriculture and Food, South Perth
DiFalco S, Chavas JP, Smale M (2007) Farmer management of production risk on degraded lands: the role of wheat varieties in the Tigray region, Ethiopia. Agric Econ Res 36:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00194
Evans LT, Fischer RA (1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci 39(6):1544. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961544x
Flohr BM, Hunt JR, Kirkegaard JA, Evans JR (2017) Water and temperature stress define the optimal flowering period for wheat in south-eastern Australia. Field Crop Res 209:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.012
Gandrofer M, Pannell D, Meyer-Aurich A (2011) Analyzing the effects of risk and uncertainty on optimal tillage and nitrogen fertiliser intensity for field crops in Germany. Agric Syst 104:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.06.004
Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, van Wijk MT, Zingore S, Mapfumo P, Adjei-Nsiah S, Herrero M, Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Rowe EC, Baijukya F, Mwijage A, Smith J, Yeboah E, van der Burg WJ, Sanogo OM, Misiko M, de Ridder N, Karanja S, Kaizzi C, K’ungu J, Mwale M, Nwaga D, Pacini C, Vanlauwe B (2011) Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agric Syst 104(2):191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002
Grové B, Oosthuizen LK (2010) Stochastic efficiency analysis of deficit irrigation with standard risk aversion. Agric Water Manag 97:792–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.010
Hardaker BJ, Lien G, Anderson JR, Huirne RBM (2015) Coping with risk in agriculture, 3rd edn. CABI Publishing, Oxford
Hardaker BJ, Richardson JW, Lien G, Gudbrand L, Schumann KD (2004) Stochastic efficiency analysis with risk aversion bounds: a simplified approach. Aust J Agric Res Econ 48(2):253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00239
Hochman Z, Gobbett D, Horan H, Navarro Garcia J (2016) Data rich yield gap analysis of wheat in Australia. Field Crop Res 197:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.017
Hochman Z, Gobbett DL, Horan H (2017) Climate trends account for stalled wheat yields in Australia since 1990. Glob Chang Biol 23:2071–2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13604
Hochman Z, Horan H (2018) Causes of wheat yield gaps and opportunities to advance the water-limited yield frontier in Australia. Field Crop Res 288:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.023
Hochman Z, Zhang A, Monjardino M, Horan H (2019) Can we close the yield gaps in Australia? ‘Proceedings of the 19th Australian Agronomy Conference, 25–29 August 2019, Wagga Wagga, Australia. Australian Society of Agronomy. 5p. www.agronomyaustralia.org/conference-proceedings. Accessed 30 Aug 2019
Holzworth DP, Huth NI, deVoil PG, Zurcher EJ, Herrmann NI, McLean G, Chenu K, van Oosterom EJ, Snow V, Murphy C, Moore AD, Brown H, Whish JPM, Verrall S, Fainges J, Bell LW, Peake AS, Poulton PL, Hochman Z, Thorburn PJ, Gaydon DS, Dalgliesh NP, Rodriguez D, Cox H, Chapman S, Doherty A, Teixeira E, Sharp J, Cichota R, Vogeler I, Li FY, Wang E, Hammer GL, Robertson MJ, Dimes JP, Whitbread AM, Hunt J, van Rees H, McClelland T, Carberry PS, Hargreaves JNG, MacLeod N, McDonald C, Harsdorf J, Wedgwood S, Keating BA (2014) APSIM - Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environ Mod Software 62:327–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
Hunt JR, Lilley JM, Trevaskis B, Flohr BM, Peake A, Fletcher A, Zwart AB, Gobbett D, Kirkegaard JA (2019) Early sowing systems can boost Australian wheat yields despite recent climate change. Nat Clim Change 9: 244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0417-9
Kingwell R (2011) Revenue volatility faced by Australian wheat farmers. 55th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. Melbourne Convention Centre, Melbourne. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/100572/2/Kingwell%20R.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2018
Komarek AM, Koo J, Haile B, Msangi S, Azzarri C (2018) Trade-offs and synergies between yield, labor, profit, and risk in Malawian maize-based cropping systems. Agron Sustain Dev 38:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0506-6
Lehmann N, Finger R, Klein T, Calanca P, Walter A (2013) Adapting crop management practices to climate change: Modeling optimal solutions at the field scale. Agric Syst 117:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.011
Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CF (2009) Crop yield gaps: Their magnitudes and causes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:179–204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740
Monjardino M, McBeath TM, Brennan L, Llewellyn RS (2013) Are farmers in low-rainfall cropping regions under-fertilising with nitrogen? A risk analysis. Agric Syst 116:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.007
Monjardino M, McBeath T, Ouzman J, Llewellyn R, Jones B (2015) Farmer risk-aversion limits closure of yield and profit gaps: a study of nitrogen management in the southern Australian wheatbelt. Agric Syst 137:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.006
Palisade Corporation (2002) Best fit, Distribution fitting for Windows v 4.5, New York.
Reynolds M, Kropff M, Crossa J, Koo J, Kruseman G, Molero Milan A, Rutkoski J, Schulthess U, Balwinder-Singh, Sonder K, Tonnang H, Vadez V (2018) Role of modelling in international crop research: overview and some case studies. Agron 8:291. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8120291
Rural Solutions SA (2011). Farm gross margin and enterprise planning guide: a gross margin template for crop and livestock enterprises 2011.
Sadras VO, Rodriguez D (2010) Modelling the nitrogen-driven trade-off between nitrogen utilisation efficiency and water use efficiency of wheat in eastern Australia. Field Crop Res 118:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.010
Van Dijk M, Morley T, Jongeneel R, Van Ittersum M, Reidsma P, Ruben R (2017) Disentangling agronomic and economic yield gaps: an integrated framework and application. Agric Syst 154:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.004
Van Ittersum M, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance–a review. Field Crop Res 143:4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
Van Rees H, McClelland T, Hochman Z, Carberry P, Hunt J, Huth N, Holzworth D (2014) Leading farmers in South East Australia have closed the exploitable wheat yield gap: prospects for further improvement. Field Crop Res 164:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.018
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Zhang A, Hochman Z, Horan H, Navarro Garcia J, Das BT, Waldner F (2019) Socio-psychological and management drivers explain farm level wheat yield gaps in Australia. Agron Sustain Dev 39:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0556-4