Xi Nerve-sparing Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: European Single-center Technique and Outcomes

Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, et al. EAU guidelines: prostate cancer. Young, 1977, The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate, CA Cancer J Clin, 27, 308, 10.3322/canjclin.27.5.308 Minafra, 2021, Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era, Curr Opin Urol, 31, 11, 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000830 Porpiglia, 2018, Five-year outcomes for a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol Focus, 4, 80, 10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.007 Basiri, 2018, Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?, World J Urol, 36, 609, 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1 Carbonara, 2021, Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes, World J Urol, 39, 3721, 10.1007/s00345-021-03687-5 Martini, 2020, Contemporary techniques of prostate dissection for robot-assisted prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 78, 583, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.017 Traboulsi, 2020, Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, World J Urol, 38, 2791, 10.1007/s00345-020-03096-0 Chang, 2020, Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy: initial experience with the da Vinci Si robotic system, Urol Int, 104, 710, 10.1159/000505557 Kaouk, 2016, Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy, Urology, 94, 129, 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.063 Tuğcu, 2020, Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: a review of 95 cases, BJU Int, 125, 573, 10.1111/bju.15018 Mitropoulos, 2012, Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations, Eur Urol, 61, 341, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033 Gandaglia, 2019, A novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node, Eur Urol, 75, 506, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012 Edge, 2010, The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM, Ann Surg Oncol, 17, 1471, 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4 Crocerossa, 2021, Detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen tracers for positron emission tomography/computed tomography in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, J Urol, 205, 356, 10.1097/JU.0000000000001369 Stolzenburg, 2021, Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from the first multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial in radical prostatectomy (LAP-01), Eur Urol, 79, 750, 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.030 Jo, 2018, Effect of starting penile rehabilitation with sildenafil immediately after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on erectile function recovery: a prospective randomized trial, J Urol, 199, 1600, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.060 van Velthoven, 2020, Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method, Urology, 145, 331, 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.026 Assel, 2019, Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology, J Urol, 201, 595, 10.1097/JU.0000000000000001 Francavilla, 2022, Radical prostatectomy technique in the robotic evolution: from da Vinci standard to single port—a single surgeon pathway, J Robot Surg, 16, 21, 10.1007/s11701-021-01194-8 Cisu, 2021, New robotic surgical systems in urology: an update, Curr Opin Urol, 31, 37, 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000833 Veccia, 2022, Single stage Xi® robotic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: surgical technique and outcomes, Minerva Urol Nephrol, 74, 233, 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04247-8 Lenfant, 2021, Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using single-port perineal approach: technique and single-surgeon matched-paired comparative outcomes, Eur Urol, 79, 384, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.013 Gandaglia, 2018, The impact of implementation of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel recommendations on reporting and grading complications on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 74, 4, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.025 Mazzone, 2021, Technical refinements in superextended robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer patients at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, Eur Urol, 80, 104, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.009 Mazzone, 2021, Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines, World J Urol, 39, 803, 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5 Dell’Oglio, 2021, Robot-assisted Boari flap and psoas hitch ureteric reimplantation: technique insight and outcomes of a case series with ≥1 year of follow-up, BJU Int, 128, 625, 10.1111/bju.15421 Egan, 2021, Eur Urol, 79, 839, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010 Galfano, 2010, A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery, Eur Urol, 58, 457, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008 Branche, 2022, Management of bladder neck contracture in the age of robotic prostatectomy: an evidence-based guide, Eur Urol Focus, 8, 297, 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.007 Weldon, 1995, Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy, J Urol, 153, 1565, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67462-7 Freedland, 2005, Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study, J Clin Oncol, 23, 7546, 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.525 Quarto, 2020, Avoiding disruption of timely surgical management of genitourinary cancers during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, BJU Int, 126, 425, 10.1111/bju.15174