Wrist Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Treatment in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: From Distal-to-Proximal Motor Recovery

Stefano Mazzoleni1, Vi-Do Tran1, Paolo Dario1, Federico Posteraro2
1Polo Sant’Anna Valdera, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, The BioRobotics Institute, Pontedera, Italy
2Rehabilitation Department, Versilia Hospital, Camaiore, Italy

Tóm tắt

In this paper, the recovery of proximal and distal segments in stroke patients who received distal training alone was investigated. Forty (20 subacute and 20 chronic) stroke patients were recruited to perform wrist robot-assisted rehabilitation training. The upper extremity, shoulder-elbow, and wrist subsections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale were used to assess the motor recovery of distal and proximal segments. In addition, the modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, and box and block test were used as clinical outcome measures together with kinematic parameters to evaluate the effects of the training. Significant increases in the wrist and shoulder-elbow subsections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale, motricity index, and box and block test were found in both the groups. Average changes in shoulder-elbow and upper extremity subsections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in the subacute group (6.10 ± 6.60 and 15.65 ± 14.04) were significantly higher (${p} <;0.05$ ) than those in the chronic group (2.30 ± 2.76 and 6.60 ± 4.64). In addition, significant increases in the movement velocity, movement smoothness, and movement quality were observed in the subacute group. Our findings provide evidence that following a robot-assisted rehabilitation treatment, there is a distal-to-proximal generalization in subacute stroke patients.

Từ khóa

#Rehabilitation #robotics #wrist #upper limb

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/1545968317697034

10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5

lambercy, 2011, Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: A pilot study, J Neuroeng Rehabil, 8, 10.1186/1743-0003-8-63

10.1186/1743-0003-11-154

10.2522/ptj.20110009

10.1310/tsr18s01-599

10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0044

10.1161/01.STR.0000177865.37334.ce

10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.002

10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04954-7

10.1177/1545968314565510

10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e

10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762807

10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903899

10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2034162

10.3389/fneng.2014.00030

10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.119

10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90095-9

10.1186/1743-0003-11-137

10.2340/16501977-1234

10.1155/2015/482389

song, 2013, Myoelectrically controlled wrist robot for stroke rehabilitation, J Neuroeng Rehabil, 10, 52, 10.1186/1743-0003-10-52

mehrholz, 2017, Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke, Cochrane Database Syst Rev

10.1006/exnr.1997.6507

10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5

merians, 2009, Innovative approaches to the rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiparesis using virtual environments, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 45, 123

10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70066-8

10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.004

10.1186/1743-0003-6-1

10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003

10.1177/1545968316666957

mazzoleni, 2013, Effects of proximal and distal robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on chronic stroke recovery, Neurorehabilitation, 33, 33, 10.3233/NRE-130925

10.1159/000441085

10.1186/s12984-015-0059-8

10.1177/1545968305284528

10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.005

10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968

10.1093/ptj/67.2.206

10.3233/NRE-131002

fugl-meyer, 1975, The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance, Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, 13, 10.2340/1650197771331

10.1007/s11517-011-0808-1

10.1016/0003-9993(94)90130-9

10.1097/WCO.0000000000000153

10.1159/000115178