Working together: collaborative decision making for sustainable Integrated Coastal Management (ICM)

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 959-968 - 2018
Christina Gillgren1, Josianne G. Støttrup2, Johanna Schumacher3,4, Grete E. Dinesen2
1Gillgren and Associates, Bicton, Australia
2DTU Aqua, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
3Leibniz Institute for Baltic-Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany
4Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania

Tóm tắt

Community involvement and genuine engagement with citizens is an important, integral element of the Systems Approach Framework (SAF). The SAF provides a structure for an Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) process using a multidisciplinary approach that integrates environmental, social and economic viability and well-being. An assessment of the SAF and its application with respect to citizen engagement and participation uncovered two main issues: (i) the implications of engaging stakeholders have not been fully understood and are still not an integral part of the SAF ICM process; and (ii) the need to include validation. This article sets out to address these issues. It explores the paradigm shift in government-citizen interaction that moves from a management “outputs”-based approach to a more collaborative partnership approach focused on “outcomes”. This shift necessitates a more robust public participation framework that is timely, iterative and genuinely inclusive. Without community and stakeholder “buy-in” it is difficult to achieve the behavioural change necessary to achieve sustainability. Engagement considerations should be addressed from the outset and throughout the process to the “Implementation” and “Monitoring and Evaluation” steps. Furthermore, this paper identifies the need to move beyond these steps to include validation in the SAF, especially when dealing with highly complex issues. In this way, citizens take ownership of the issue(s), participate in identifying solutions and strive to maintain sustainable development. This paper provides the necessary input to how the SAF can integrate credible public participation for outcomes that are more successful and lead to greater sustainability and improved social capital.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersen SF (2016) A retrospective analysis of management of cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis). Possible benefits of using System Approach Framework on a case of cormorants at Tofte Lake, Denmark. University of Copenhagen, Masters Thesis, 47 pp Birch D (2002) Corporate citizenship in Australia: some ups, some downs. J Corp Citizsh 5:73–84 Bookchin M (1982) The ecology of freedom: the emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. San Francisco Cheshire Books, 1982. Reprinted with a new introduction by AK Press, 2005 Browne BW (2004) Imagine Chicago: a methodology for cultivating community. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.795 Carson L (2011) Dilemmas, disasters and deliberative democracy: getting the public back into policy. Griffith Rev 32:38–46 Castles S (2011) Migration, crisis, and the global labour market. Globalizations 8:311–324 Clark H (2015) Sustainable development needs public participation, huffington post and open governemnt partnership (OGP) OGP 2015 Global Summit https://www.huffingtonpost.com/helen-clark/sustainable-development-n_1_b_8412692.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2018 Crowley K (2009) Can deliberative democracy be Practised? A sub-national policy pathway. Pol Policy 37:995–1021 Dinesen GE, Timmermann K, Roth E et al (2011) Mussel production and water framework directive targets in the Limfjord, Denmark: an integrated assessment for use in system-based management. Ecol Soc 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04259-160426 Drucker P (Ed) (2017) The concept of the corporation, 2nd edn. The new American library. Routledge, New York, pp 329 Faludi A (2000) The performance of spatial planning. Plan Pract Res 15:299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/713691907 Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L Garton Ash T (2016) Q&A: Timothy Garton ash on trump, Brexit and the age of media polarisation. Columbia Journal. Rev. https://www.cjr.org/q_and_a/timothy_gart. Accessed 1 Aug 2017 Garton Ash T (2017a) The voice of the people? EU Referendum & Brexit: analysis. Univ. Oxford. https://www.cjr.org/q_and_a/timothy_garton_ash.php. Accessed 1 Aug 2017 Garton Ash T (2017b) A year after voting for Brexit, Britain’s divided, and in uncharted waters. EU Referendum & Brexit: Analysis. Univ. Oxford. http://www.ox.ac.uk/news-and-events/oxford-and-brexit/brexit-analysis/one-year-on. Accessed 1 Aug 2017 Geczi E (2007) Sustainability and public participation: toward an inclusive model of democracy. Adm Theory Prax 29:375–393 Gillgren C (2007) Teacher Jury Report 1. Doc No. 2008/33678 Curriculum Council, Govt. of Western Australia Gillgren C (2008) Teacher Jury Validation Report 1–3. Doc No 2008/13074 Curriculum Council, Govt. of Western Australia Guimarães Pereira A, Funtowicz S (2006) Knowledge representation and mediation for transdisciplinary frameworks: tools to inform debates, dialogues & deliberations. Int J Transdiscipl Res 1:34–50 Healey P (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. Eur Plan Stud 14:525–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500421196 Hindess B (2002) Deficit by design. Aust J Public Adm 61:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00256 Hopkins TS, Bailly D, Støttrup JG (2011) A systems approach framework for coastal zones. Ecol Soc 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04553-160425 Hopkins TS, Bailly D, Elmgren R et al (2012) A systems approach framework for the transition to sustainable development: potential value based on coastal experiments. Ecol Soc 17:39 Konstantinou ZI, Krestenitis YN, Latinopoulos D et al (2012) Aspects of mussel-farming activity in Chalastra, Thermaikos Gulf, Greece: an effort to untie a management Gordian knot. Ecol Soc 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04455-170101 Lukensmeyer CJ (2013) Bringing citizen voices to the table: a guide for public managers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Melaku Canu D, Campostrini P, Riva SD et al (2011) Addressing sustainability of clam farming in the Venice lagoon. Ecol Soc 16:20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04263-160326 Newton A, Elliott M (2016) A typology of stakeholders and guidelines for engagement in transdisciplinary, participatory processes 3:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00230 Newton A, Carruthers TJB, Icely J (2012) Estuarine, coastal and shelf science the coastal syndromes and hotspots on the coast. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 96:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.07.012 Pavlova O V (2017) The legal basis of public participation in the international environmental governance as a requirement for sustain dev. 267–271. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n2p267 Pinarbaşı K, Galparsoro I, Borja Á et al (2017) Decision support tools in marine spatial planning: present applications, gaps and future perspectives. Mar Policy 83:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.031 Reis J (2014) Introduction to systems approaches in coastal management-the legacy of the SPICOSA project. Mar Policy 43:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.012 Robinson L (2002) Public outrage and public trust. http://www.enablingchange.com.au/Public_outrage_public_trust.pdf Salamon LM (2011) The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction. Fordham Urban Law J 28:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23. Sandman P (1987) Risk communication: facing public outrage. US Environ Prot Agency J 13:21–22 Schernewski G, Bartel C, Kobarg N, Karnauskaite D (2017a) Retrospective assessment of a managed coastal realignment and lagoon restoration measure: the Geltinger Birk, Germany. J Coast Conserv 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0496-6 Schernewski G, Schumacher J, Weisner E, Donges L (2017b) A combined coastal protection, realignment and wetland restoration scheme in the southern Baltic: planning process, public information and participation. J Coast Conserv 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0542-4 Schumacher J, Schernewski G, Bielecka M, Loizides MI, Loizidou XI (2018) Methodologies to support coastal management-a stakeholder preference and planning tool and its application. Mar Policy 94:150–157 Støttrup JG, Dinesen GE, Janssen H et al (2017) Re-visiting ICM theory and practice: lessons learned from the Baltic Sea region. Ocean Coast Manag 139:64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.002 Timmermann K, Dinesen GE, Markager S et al (2014) Development and use of a bioeconomic model for management of mussel fisheries under different nutrient regimes in the temperate estuary of the Limfjord, Denmark. Ecol Soc 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06041-190114 Vigoda E (2002) From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm Rev 62:527–540 Walters L, Aydelotte J, Miller J (2000) Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Adm Rev 60:357 Zivkovic S (2017) How can education for sustainability create systemic change? In: Corcoran PB, Weakland JP, Wals AEJ (eds) Envisioning futures for environmental and sustainability education, pp 169–180