Word length effects in Hebrew

Ahissar, 1996, Learning pop-out detection: specificities to stimulus characteristics, Vision Res., 36, 3487, 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00036-3 Bouma, 1973, Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words, Vision Res., 13, 767, 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90041-2 Brysbaert, 1994, Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli, Behav. Brain Res., 64, 151, 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90127-9 Brysbaert, 1996, The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: on the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition, Neuropsychology, 10, 385, 10.1037/0894-4105.10.3.385 Bub, 1988, Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields, Brain Lang., 33, 161, 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90060-0 Chiarello, 1988, Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: a review of visual half-field research Cohen, 2000, The visual word form area, Brain, 123, 291, 10.1093/brain/123.2.291 Deutsch, 1999, Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words, Lang. Cogn. Processes, 14, 393, 10.1080/016909699386284 Ellis, 1988, Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres, Brain Lang., 35, 254, 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90111-3 Gill, 1974, Word length and exposure time effects on the recognition of bilaterally presented words, Bull. Psychon. Soc., 4, 173, 10.3758/BF03334234 Iacoboni, 1996, Hemispheric independence in word recognition: evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations, Brain Lang., 53, 121, 10.1006/brln.1996.0040 Lavidor, 2002, Word length and orthographic neighbourhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres, Brain Lang., 80, 45, 10.1006/brln.2001.2583 Lavidor, 2004, The nature of foveal representation, Nat. Rev., Neurosci., 5, 729, 10.1038/nrn1498 Lavidor, 2001, Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 12, 265, 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00056-8 Lavidor, 2002, Case alternation and length effects in lateralized word recognition: studies of English and Hebrew, Brain Cogn., 50, 257, 10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00508-0 Monaghan, 2004, Hemispheric asymmetries in cognitive modelling: connectionist modelling of unilateral visual neglect, Psychol. Rev., 111, 283, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.283 Nazir, 2000, Traces of print along the visual pathway Nazir, 1990, Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system, Spat. Vis., 5, 81, 10.1163/156856890X00011 Nazir, 1992, Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words, Percept. Psychophys., 52, 315, 10.3758/BF03209148 Oldfield, 1971, The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, 9, 97, 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 Whitney, 2001, How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 8, 221, 10.3758/BF03196158 Whitney, 2001, Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding, Connect. Sci., 13, 235, 10.1080/09540090110083659 Whitney, 2002, An explanation of the length effect for rotated words, Cogn. Syst. Res., 3, 113, 10.1016/S1389-0417(01)00050-X Whitney, 2004, Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access, Brain Lang., 88, 279, 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00160-3 Whitney, 1999, A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia, Prog. Brain Res., 121, 143, 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63072-1 Whitney, 2004, Why word length only matters in the left visual field, Neuropsychologia, 42, 1680, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.007 Young, 1985, Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields, Brain Lang., 24, 326, 10.1016/0093-934X(85)90139-7