Word identification, metacognitive knowledge, motivation and reading comprehension: An Australian study of Grade 3 and 4 pupils

Boekaerts, M.M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231. Burgon, J.R. (1988). Tests of Reading Comprehension (TORCH) pilot study. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED326855). Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1993). Reading Self-Concept Scale. Unpublished scale, Massey University, Educational Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167. Chapman, J.W, Tunmer, W.E., & Prochnow, J.E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 703–708. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27 Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on interventions studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition & Learning, 3, 231–264. Elley, W.B., & Reid, N. (1969). Progressive Achievement Tests: Reading comprehension. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Goswami, U. (2008). Reading, complexity and the brain. Literacy, 42(2), 67–74. Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into the science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 199–205. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. Ill, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. Jacobs, J.E., & Paris, S.G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 225–278. Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719–729. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447 Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2010). Investigating gender differences in reading. Educational Review, 62, 175–187 Marsh, H.W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of maths and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107–116. Marx, H. (1998). Knuspels Leseaufgaben, Forms A & B. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. McLain, K.V.M., Gridley, B.E., & Mcintosh, D. (1991). Value of a scale used to measure metacognitive reading processes. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 81–87 Miller, S.D., & Faircloth, B.S. (2009). Motivation and reading comprehension. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 307–322). Ming Chui, M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362. Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimen-sionaler und sozialer Vergleiche [On the development of academic self-concepts: The impact of social and dimensional comparisons.] Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19–27 Mossenson, L., Hill, P., & Masters, G. (1995). Tests of Reading Comprehension (TORCH). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P.E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468. Paris, S.G., Lipson, M.Y., & Wixson, K.K. (1994). Becoming a strategic reader. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 788–811). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Paris, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. Pekrun, R. & Zirngibl, A.C. (2004). Schülermerkmale in Mathematik. [Student characteristics in mathematics]. In PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Hrsg.): PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (Seiten 191–210) [PISA 2003. The level of education of young people in Germany - Results of the second international comparison (pp. 191–210). Münster: Waxmann. Pintrich, P.R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student-Perceptions: Causes and consequences (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C.C. Block, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). New York: Guilford. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford. Pressley, M., & Harris, K.H. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P.A. Alexander, & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Rider, N., & Colmar, S. (2006). Reading achievement and reading self-concept in Year 3 students. In P.L. Jeffery, Ed., AARE Education Research. Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions (pp. 1-Paper No). Parramatta, 27 Nov-1 Dec 2005. Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C.E. (2003). Reading metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in Grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(1), 75–86. Samuels, S.J. (2006). Reading fluency: Its past, present, and future. In T. Rasinski, C. Blachowicz, & K. Lems (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 7–20). New York: Guilford. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323. Schlagmüller, M., Visé, M., & Schneider, W. (2001). Zur Erfassung des Gedächtniswissens bei Grundschulkindern: Konstruktionsprinzipien und empirische Bewährung der Würzburger Testbatterie zum deklarativen Metagedächtnis. [The acquisition of primary school children’s knowledge about memory: Design principles and empirical verification of the Würzburg Test Battery of Declarative Metamemory]). Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 33(1), 91–102. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Sweet, A.R, & Snow, C.E. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In A.P. Snow C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 1–11). New York: Guilford Press. Taboada, A., Tonks, S.M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85–106. Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Garcia, G.E., Stahl, K., & Bauer, E. (2006). Improving students’ reading comprehension. In K. Stahl, Ed., Seeking understanding in how to teach reading: Selected works by Steven Stahl (pp. 303–315). New York: Guilford. Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26. Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2002). The relation of beginning readers’ reported word identification strategies to reading achievement, reading-related skills, and academic self-perceptions. Reading and Writing: In Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 341–358. van Kraayenoord, C.E. (1996). The Interest in Reading Scale. Unpublished scale, The University of Queensland, Fred and Eleanor Schonell Special Education Research Centre, Brisbane, Australia. van Kraayenoord, C.E., & Schneider, W. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in Grades 3 and 4). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305–324. Vellutino, E.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1994). Component of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G.R. Lyon, Ed., Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279–332). Philadelphia, PA: Brookes Publishing Co. Visé, M., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (1998). Würzburg Metamemory Test (rev. ed.). Würzburg, Germany: Universität Würzburg, Institut für Psychologie. Wang, J.H.Y., & Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186. Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68. Winne, P.H. (2005). A perspective on state-of-the-art research on self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5/6), 559–565. Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests - Revised, Form H. Examiner’s Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Woolley, G.E. (2007). A comprehension intervention for children with reading comprehension difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(1), 43–50.