Women's work interruptions and career prospects in Germany and Sweden

Emerald - Tập 32 Số 9/10 - Trang 561-575 - 2012
MarieEvertsson1, DanielaGrunow2
1Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on two welfare state regimes with differing degrees of de‐familialisation strategies, Germany and Sweden, to study whether and how women's career interruptions influence their labour market prospects. By comparing women with continuous careers to those with discontinuous careers due to: parental leave or homemaking; unemployment; or other reasons, the authors explore the support for the skill depreciation hypothesis and signalling theory. Depending on the type of welfare state regime, the authors expect women to be subject to varying degrees of career punishment for time spent out of the labour market.Design/methodology/approachCox proportional hazard regression models of the transition rate of an upward or downward occupational move among women in the labour market were estimated.FindingsFocusing on upward career moves, the results show no significant relationship between a career interruption and upward occupational moves in Germany. In Sweden, the longer the accumulated duration of family leave, the lower the transition rate to an upward move. Overall occupational mobility is higher in Sweden, and in a policy regime where almost all women work, extended leaves may have a more negative effect on career prospects than in Germany, where many mothers drop out of the labour force altogether. In Germany, on the other hand, the authors find traces of unemployment to be scarring, as the risk of downward moves increases with increased unemployment experience.Originality/valueThe paper explores the impact of policies in shaping women's career trajectories and critically examines the often‐cited skill depreciation hypothesis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M. and Grunow, D. (2009), “Is there a career penalty for mothers' time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States”, Social Forces, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 573‐606.

Albrecht, J.W., Edin, P.‐A., Sundström, M. and Vroman, S.B. (1999), “Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: a reexamination using Swedish data”, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 294‐311.

Blossfeld, H.‐P., Buchholz, S., Hofäcker, D., Hofmeister, H., Kurz, K. and Mills, M. (2007), “Globalisierung und die Veränderung sozialer Ungleichheiten in modernen Gesellschaften”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 667‐91.

Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2010), available at: www.pub.arbeitsagentur.de/hst/services/statistik/interim/analytik/grafikanalysen/jzeitreihen.shtml (accessed September 27, 2011).

Busemeyer, M.R. (2009), “Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies”, Socio‐Economic Review, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 375‐406.

Ebbinghaus, B. and Eichhorst, W. (2006), “Employment regulation and labor market policy in Germany, 1991‐2005”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2505, available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp2505.pdf (accessed September 29, 2011).

Edin, P.‐A. and Gustavsson, M. (2008), “Time out of work and skill depreciation”, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 163‐80.

Ervasti, H. and Venetoklis, T. (2010), “Unemployment and subjective well‐being: an empirical test of deprivation theory, incentive paradigm and financial strain approach”, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 119‐39.

Esping‐Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Evertsson, M. and Duvander, A.‐Z. (2011), “Parental leave – possibility or trap? Does family leave length affect Swedish women's labor market opportunities?”, European Sociological Review, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 435‐50.

Ferrarini, T. (2006), Families, States and Labour Markets. Institutions, Causes and Consequences of Family Policy in Post‐war Welfare States, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Gangl, M. (2006), “Scar effects of unemployment: an assessment of institutional complementarities”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 71 No. 6, pp. 986‐1013.

Gibbons, R. and Katz, L.F. (1991), “Layoffs and lemons”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 351‐80.

Grunow, D., Hofmeister, H. and Buchholz, S. (2006), “Late 20th‐century persistence and decline of the female homemaker in Germany and the United States”, International Sociology, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 101‐31.

Hofmeister, H., Blossfeld, H.‐P. and Mills, M. (2006), “Globalization, uncertainty and women's mid‐career life courses: a theoretical framework”, in Blossfeld, H.‐P. and Hofmeister, H. (Eds), Globalization, Uncertainty, and Women's Careers: An International Comparison, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Kenjoh, E. (2005), “New mothers' employment and public policy in the UK, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Japan”, Labour, Vol. 19, pp. 5‐49.

Ketsche, P.G. and Branscomb, L. (2003), “The long‐term costs of career interruptions”, Journal of Health Care Management, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 30‐44.

Knabe, A. and Rätzel, S. (2011), “Scarring or scaring? The pshychological impact of past unemployment and future unemployment risk”, Economica, Vol. 78 No. 310, pp. 283‐93.

Korpi, T. and Mertens, A. (2003), “Training systems and labor mobility: a comparison between Germany and Sweden”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 105 No. 4, pp. 597‐617.

Korpi, T. and Stenberg, S.‐Å. (2001), “Massarbetslöshetens Sverige – arbetslöshetens karaktär och effekter på individers levnadsförhållanden”, in Fritzell, J., Gähler, M. and Lundberg, O. (Eds), Välfärd och arbete i arbetslöshetens årtionde. Kommittén Välfärdsbokslut/SOU 2001:53, Fritzes, Stockholm.

Kunze, A. (2002), “The timing of careers and human capital depreciation”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 509, The Institute for Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.

Leitner, S. (2003), “Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective”, European Societies, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 353‐75.

Lister, R. (1994), “‘She has other duties’: women, citizenship and social security”, in Baldwin, S. and Falkingham, J. (Eds), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, Harvest Wheatsheaf, New York, NY.

Lombard, K.V. (1999), “Women's rising market opportunities and increased labor force participation”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 195‐212.

Mayer, K.U., Grunow, D. and Nitsche, N. (2010), “Mythos Flexibilisierung? Wie instabil sind Berufsbiografien wirklich und als wie instabil werden sie wahrgenommen?”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 369‐402.

Mincer, J. and Polachek, S. (1974), “Family investments in human capital: earnings of women”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. S76‐S108.

Nordenmark, M., Strandh, M. and Layte, R. (2011), “The impact of unemployment benefit system on the mental well‐being of the unemployed in Sweden Ireland and Great Britain”, European Societies, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 83‐110.

OECD (2006), Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care, OECD, Paris.

Österholm, P. (2010), “Unemployment and labour‐force participation in Sweden”, Economics Letters, Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 205‐8.

Ruhm, C.J. (1991), “Are workers permanently scarred by job displacement?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 81 No. 1, pp. 319‐24.

Sayer, L.C. and Gornick, J.M. (2011), “Cross‐national variation in the influence of employment hours on child care time”, European Sociological Review, February 23.

Stier, H., Lewin‐Epstein, N. and Braun, M. (2001), “Welfare regimes, family‐supportive policies, and women's employment along the life‐course”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 106 No. 6, pp. 1731‐60.

Treiman, D.J. (1977), Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective, Academic Press, New York, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 32 Số 9/10

561-575

Thông tin tác giả