Willingness to pay for eco-labelled wood furniture: Choice-based conjoint analysis versus open-ended contingent valuation

Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64, 10.2307/3180269 Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G. (Eds.), 1999. Valuing Environmental Preferences: The Theory and Practice of The Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Beggs, 1981, Assessing the potential demand for electric cars, Journal of Econometrics, 16, 1, 10.1016/0304-4076(81)90056-7 Brown, 1996, Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?, Land Economics, 72, 152, 10.2307/3146963 Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A., 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, series no. 07-017, Sage Publications Inc., Beverly Hills and London. Carson, 2000 Carson, 1994, Experimental analysis of choice, Marketing Letters, 5, 351, 10.1007/BF00999210 Caussade, 2005, Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates, Transportation Research Part B, 39, 621, 10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006 Cummings, 1986 Cummings, 1995, Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: is the dichotomous choice approach incentive compatible?, American Economic Review, 85, 260 DEMOSKOP, 1997. Nordic forestry: the public opinion in Holland, Germany and Great Britain. Report 7093rp01, Demoskop AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 15pp. Foster, V., Mourato, S., 1997. Behavioural consistency, statistical specification and validity in the contingent ranking method: evidence from a survey on the impacts of pesticide use in the UK. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 97-09, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment CSERGE, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 39pp. Green, 1974, On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives, Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 61, 10.1086/208592 Green, 1978, Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlooks, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103, 10.1086/208721 Green, 1990, Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing, 54, 3, 10.2307/1251756 Greene, 1993 Gregory, 1993, Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 177, 10.1007/BF01065813 Hanemann, 1984, Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332, 10.2307/1240800 Hanemann, 1994, Valuing the environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 19, 10.1257/jep.8.4.19 Hanemann, 1999, The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data Hanley, 1998, Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x Hensher, 1994, Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice, Transportation, 21, 107, 10.1007/BF01098788 IFO, 1997. Træ er miljø: undersøgelse af kendskab, holdninger and adfærd. (In Danish) IFO - Instituttet for Opinionsanalyse, Copenhagen, Denmark. Jick, 1979, Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602, 10.2307/2392366 Jin, 2006, Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao, Ecological Economics, 57, 430, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.020 Johansson, 1987 Kealy, 1990, Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: does the nature of the good matter?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, 244, 10.1016/0095-0696(90)90072-7 Kriström, 1997, Spike models in contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013, 10.2307/1244440 Louviere, 1988, Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences: a review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity, Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy, 22, 93 Louviere, 1992, Experimental choice analysis: introduction and overview, Journal of Business Research, 24, 89, 10.1016/0148-2963(92)90054-F Magat, 1988, Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 395, 10.1016/0095-0696(88)90034-4 McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior Mitchell, 1989 MMI, 1997. Holdninger til skog, skogbruk og skogprodukter. Report, May 26, 1997, Markeds- og Mediainstituttet as (MMI), Oslo, Norway. 63pp (in Norwegian). Ortúzar, 2000, Application of willingness-to-pay methods to value transport externalities in less developed countries, Environment and Planning A, 32, 2007, 10.1068/a3324 Ozanne, 1997, Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products: a consumer perspective, Forest Products Journal, 47, 39 Ozanne, 2003, Certification from the US consumer perspective: a comparison of 1995 and 2000, Forest Products Journal, 53, 13 O’Brien, 2004, Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products, Journal of Forest Economics, 10, 75, 10.1016/j.jfe.2004.05.001 Pajari, B., Peck, T., Rametsteiner, E., 1999. Potential markets for certified forest products in Europe. EFI Proceedings no. 25, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland. 352pp. Rametsteiner, 2003, Forest certification – an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?, Journal of Environmental Management, 67, 87, 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00191-3 Randall, 1974, Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 132, 10.1016/0095-0696(74)90010-2 Research International 1997. Qualitative research: forestry. Report 4740, June 13, 1997, Research International, UK. 1997 Scarpa, 2006, Distribution of willingness-to-pay for speed reduction with non-positive bidders: is choice modelling consistent with contingent valuation?, Transport Reviews, 26, 451, 10.1080/01441640600602252 Schulze, 1996, Sources of bias in contingent valuation Sedjo, 2002, Voluntary eco-labeling and the price premium, Land Economics, 78, 272, 10.2307/3147273 Stevens, 2000, Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management, Ecological Economics, 32, 63, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00071-3 Sælensminde, 2002, The impact of choice inconsistencies in stated choice studies, Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 403, 10.1023/A:1021358826808 Varian, 1992 Veisten, 2002, Potential demand for certified wood products in the United Kingdom and Norway, Forest Science, 48, 767 Veisten, 2004, Willingness to pay for certified wooden furniture: a market segment analysis, Wood and Fiber Science, 36, 40 Zwerina, K., Huber, J., Kuhfeld, W.F., 1996. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Paper draft, version September 1996, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, US. 33pp.