Willingness to Pay for the Authenticity of the Curonian Spit
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Balmford A, Green JMH, Anderson M, Beresford J, Huang C, Naidoo R, Walpole M, Manica A (2015) Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biol 13(2):e002074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074
Bateman IJ, Turner RK (1993) Valuation of the environment, methods and techniques: the contingent valuation method. In Turner RK (ed) Sustainable environmental economics and management: principles and practice. Belhaven press, London, pp 120–191
Birdir S, Ünal Ö, Birdir K, Williams AT (2013) Willingness to pay as an economic instrument for coastal tourism management: cases from Mersin, Turkey. Tour Manage 36:279–283
Castaño-Isaza J, Newball R, Roach B, Lau WWY (2015) Valuing beaches to develop payment for ecosystem services schemes in Colombia’s Seaflower marine protected area. Ecosyst Serv 11:22–31
Chaudhry P, Tewari VP, Singh B (2008) WTP vs WTA for assessing the recreational benefits of urban forests: a case from a modern and planned city of a developing country. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 18(3):215–231
Chen B, Nakama Y, Zhang Y (2017) Traditional village forest landscapes: Tourists' attitudes and preferences for conservation. Tour Manage 59:652–662
Czajkowski M, Ahtiainen H, Artell J, Budziński W, Hasler B, Hasselström L, Meyerhoff J, Nõmmann T, Semeniene D, Söderqvist T, Tuhkanen H, Lankia T, Vanags A, Zandersen M, Zylicz T, Hanley N (2015) Valuing the commons: an international study on the recreational benefits of the Baltic Sea. J Environ Manag 156:209–217
Garcίa-Llorente M, Martίn-Lόpez B, Montes C (2011) Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: insights for conservation policies. Environ Sci Policy 14:76–88
Getzner M, Švajda J (2015) Preferences of tourists with regard to changes of the landscape of the Tatra National Park in Slovakia. Land Use Policy 48:107–119
Huang JC, Haab TC, Whitehead JC (1997) Willingness to pay for quality improvements: should revealed and stated preference data be combined? J Environ Econ Manage 34:240–255
IUCN (International Union for Nature Conservation) (2010) 50 years working for protected areas: a brief history of IUCN world commission on protected areas. IUCN, Gland
Laband DN (2013) The neglected stepchildren of forest-based ecosystem services: cultural, spiritual, and aesthetic values. Forest Policy Econ 35:39–44
Lazdinis I, Rudzkienė V, Azbainis V (2012) Lithuanian parks valuation using contingent valuation method [in Lithuanian]. Darnaus vystymosi strategija ir praktika 6:6–19
Lόpez-Mozquera N (2016) Gender differences, theory of planned behavior and willingness to pay. J Environ Psychol 45:165–175
Marre JB, Thebaud O, Pascoe S, Jennings S, Boncoeur J, Coglan L (2016) Is economic valuation of ecosystem services useful to decision-makers? Lessons learned from Australian coastal and marine management. J Environ Manag 178:52–62
Meinard Y, Dereniowska M, Gharbie JS (2016) The ethical stakes in monetary valuation methods for conservation purposes. Biol Conserv 199:67–74
MoE (2015) Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania http://www.am.lt/VI/en/VI/article.php3?article_id=650 . Accessed 5 May 2015
Onofri L, Nunes P (2013) Beach ‘lovers’ and ‘greens’: a worldwide empirical analysis of coastal tourism. Ecol Econ 88:49–56
Pandit R, Laband DN (2010) A hedonic analysis of the impact of tree shade on summertime residential energy consumption. Arboricult Urban For 36:73–80
Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2003) A quantitative method for accounting human opinion, preferences and perceptions in ecosystem management. J Environ Manag 68:193–205
Peters H, Hawkins JP (2009) Access to marine parks: a comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean Coast Manag 52:219–228
Spangenberg JH, Settele J (2010) Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7:327–337
Sugden R (2001) Public goods and contingent valuation. In: Bateman IJ, Willis KG (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 511–539
Sun G, Lockaby BG (2012) Water quantity and quality at the urban-rural interface. In: Laband DN, Lockaby BG, Zipperer W (eds) Urban-Rural interfaces: linking people and nature. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 29–48
Turner RW, Giuda A, Noddin L (2005) Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. Econ Bull 17:1–15
Tyrväinen L, Väänänen H (1998) The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landsc Urban Plan 43:105–118
UNESCO (2016) Curonian Spit http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/994 . Accessed 8 Dec 2016
Voke M, Fairley I, Willis M, Masters I (2013) Economic evaluation of the recreational value of the coastal environment in a marine renewables deployment area. Ocean Coast Manage 78:77–87