Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random‐Effects Models

10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X

10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00090-5

10.2307/2297111

10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00057-8

Campbell D.Discrete Choice Experiments Applied to the Valuation of Rural Environmental Landscape Improvements(Unpublished PhD thesis Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences Queen's University Belfast 2006).

Campbell D., 2007, Choice Experiments Informing European Environmental Policy

10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006

10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007

10.1006/jeem.2001.1203

Greene W. H., 2003, Econometric Analysis

10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_2

10.1016/j.trb.2005.01.005

10.1111/1467-6419.00145

10.1002/jae.877

10.1023/A:1022558715350

10.1017/CBO9780511610356

10.1007/s11116-004-7613-8

Hess S.andPolak J. W.‘An Alternative Method to the Scrambled Halton Sequence for Removing Correlation Between Standard Halton Sequences in High Dimensions’(Paper Presented at the 2003 European Regional Science Conference Jyväskylä 2003; available at:http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/406.pdf; last accessed 20 December 2006).

10.3368/le.81.1.114

10.1017/CBO9780511754203

10.1111/0002-9092.00286

10.1002/hec.1104

10.1162/003465300559091

Louviere J. J., 2003, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application

10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00761.x

10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1

Nerlove M., 2002, Essays in Panel Data Econometrics

10.1162/003465398557735

10.1287/mksc.21.4.455.131

10.1002/hec.912

Scarpa R., 2007, ‘Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment study’, Land Economics, 83, 10.3368/le.83.4.617

10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00046.x

10.1068/a36137

10.2307/3147053

10.1017/CBO9780511753930

10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_7

10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_1

Wooldridge J., 2002, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data