Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link

Archambault, É., et al. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68, 329–342.

Burrell, Q. L. (1990). Empirical prediction of library circulations based on negative binomial processes. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90 (pp. 57–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66, 327–343.

Cronin, B., & Snyder, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53, 263–273.

Dekking, F. M., Kraaikamp, C., Lopuhaä, H. P., & Meester, L. E. (2005). A modern introduction to probability and statistics: Understanding why and how. London: Springer.

de Solla Price, D. J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3–22). Lexington: Heath.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. arXiv:physics/0508025

Larivière, V., et al. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 997–1004.

Leydesdorff, L., & Bensman, S. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1470–1486.

Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y., & Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of Philosophy, Sociology and Economics. Journal of Documentation, 52, 389–404.

Line, M. B. (1979). The influence of the type of sources used on the results of citation analyses. Journal of Documentation, 35, 265–284.

Linmans, A. J. M. (2008). Wetenschappelijk onderzoek in de Faculteit der Letteren van de Universiteit Leiden: Een onderzoek naar bibliometrische indicatoren voor het bepalen van impact van wetenschappelijk onderzoek in de geesteswetenschappen. Leiden: CWTS.

Luwel, M., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, A. J., et al. (1999). Towards indicators of research performance in the social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study in the fields of Law and Linguistics at Flemish Universities. Brussel: Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad.

Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.

Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66, 81–100.

Snow, C. P. (1959/1964). The two cultures: And a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Torres-Salinas, D., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 9–26.

van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335–346.

van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 408–430.