Why psychology needs conceptual analysts: Wachtel's “discontents” revisited

Foucault, 1980 Meehl, P. E. (1973). Why I do not attend case conferences. In: P. E. Meehl (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers (pp. 225–302). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Meehl, 1978, Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806, 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806 Wachtel, 1980, Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research, American Psychologist, 35, 399, 10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.399 Wakefield, 1991, Vlastos on the unity of virtue: Why Pauline predication won’t save the biconditionality thesis, Ancient Philosophy, 11, 47, 10.5840/ancientphil199111134 Wakefield, 2004, The myth of open concepts: Meehl's analysis of construct meaning versus black box essentialism, Applied & Preventive Psychology, 11, 77, 10.1016/j.appsy.2004.02.014 Wakefield, 1997, Psychoanalysis and Wittgenstein: A reply to Richard Allen, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 20, 323 Wakefield, 2006, The lay concept of conduct disorder: Do non-professionals use syndromal symptoms or internal dysfunction to distinguish disorder from delinquency?, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 210, 10.1177/070674370605100402 Wakefield, 2002, Should the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder consider social context?, American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 380, 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.380 Whitehead, 1910, 3 Vols. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). London: Basil Blackwell.