Why protection of biodiversity creates conflict – Some evidence from the Nordic countries

Balmford, 2002, Ecology-economic reasons for conserving wild nature, Science, 297, 950, 10.1126/science.1073947 Belin, 2005, Assessing private forest owner attitudes toward ecosystem-based management, Journal of Forestry, 103, 28 Boon, 2004, An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark Improving communication between authorities and owners Scandinavian, Journal of Forest Research, 19, 45 Eriksen, R., 2004. Skogeiers holdning til vern av biologisk mangfold i skog. Forest owner's attitude towards biodiversity protection in forests. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2004, How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness, Economic Journal, 114, 641, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x Götmark, 2000, Buffer zones for forest reserves: opinions of land owners and conservation value of their forest around nature reserves in southern Sweden, Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 1377, 10.1023/A:1008978831068 Gregory, 1986, Interpreting measures of economic loss: evidence from contingent valuation and experimental studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13, 325, 10.1016/0095-0696(86)90003-3 Hedwall, P.O., 2004. Attitudes towards protection of biodiversity in forests – a case study of forest owners in Skåne, Sweden. Institutionen för sydsvensk skogsvetenskap, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet. Hellström, 2001, Conflict cultures – qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry, Silva Fennica, 2, 2 Hiedanpää, 2002, European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland, Landscape and Urban Planning, 61, 113, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00106-8 Hiedanpää, 2005, The edges of conflict and consensus: a case for creativity in regional forest policy in Southwest Finland, Ecological Economics, 55, 485, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.007 Horne, 2006, Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation – a choice experiment based approach, Silva Fennica, 40, 169, 10.14214/sf.359 Hugosson, 2004, Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment, Silva Fennica, 38, 217, 10.14214/sf.430 Ingemarson, 2006, A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 249, 10.1080/02827580600662256 Kangas, 1996, Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11, 269, 10.1080/02827589609382936 Karppinen, 1998, Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland, Silva Fennica, 32, 43, 10.14214/sf.699 Kurttila, 2001, Non-industrial private forest owners’ attitudes towards the operational environment of forestry – a multinominal logit model analysis, Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 13, 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00036-8 Kuuluvainen, 1996, Landowner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply, Forest Science, 42, 300 Matsson, M., 2004. Markägare i Stockholms län och deras inställning till biodiversitet och skydd av mark. Land owners in Stockholm and their attitudes towards biodiversity and land conservation. Institutionen för skoglig resurshushållning och geomatik, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet. Mayer, 2006, Biodiversity conservation incentive programs for privately owned forests, Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 614, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.004 Niemelä, 2005, Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 877, 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.04.005 O’Neill, 1997, 22 Pregernig, 2001, Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 278, 10.1080/02827580120186 Paavola, 2004, Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union's habitats directive, Environmental Sciences, 1, 18, 10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763 Rantala, 2003, Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders’ rhetoric in Finland, Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 205, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00040-6 Sines, T.A., 2003. En studie av barskogvernets fase II i Sør-Norge. A study of phase II of the protection scheme for coniferous forests in southern Norway. Agricultural University of Norway. Skogens, E., 2004. Bruka, bevara eller både och-Styrmedel för bevarande av biologisk mångfald på privat skogsmark i Västerbotten. Use, conserve or both – measures for conservation of biodiversity in private forest land in Västerbotten. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. Størdal, 2008, Analyzing determinants of forest owners’ decision-making using a sample selection framework, Journal of Forest Economics, 14, 159, 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.07.001 Tikka, 2003, Conservation contracts in habitat protection in southern Finland, Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 271, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00045-5 Tversky, 1986, Rational choice and the framing of decisions Uliczka, 2004, Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 274, 10.1080/02827580410029318 Vaittinen, 2004 Vatn, 2005 Vatn, 2005, Virkemidler for forvaltning av biologisk mangfold. Delrapport 3: Tiltak og virkemidler for vern av biodiversitet i skog og våtmarker. Policy measures for managing biodiversity. Part 3: Actions and measures to protect biodiversity in forests and wetlands, TemaNord København: Nordisk Ministerråd, 2005, 563 Wilson, 2001 Young, 2005, Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe, Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1641, 10.1007/s10531-004-0536-z Aasetre, 2006, Perceptions of communication in Norwegian forest management, Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 81, 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.06.001