Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, S., & Henson-Apollonio, V. (2002). Defensive publishing: A strategy for maintaining intellectual property as public goods. Briefing Paper No. 53, International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), The Hague: The Netherlands. http://www.cgiar.org/www-archive/www.cgiar.org/pdf/cas_ip_defensive%20publishing%20bp-53.pdf . Accessed 26 Dec 2014.
Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4(1), 1–24.
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: Start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.
Arora, S. K., Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2013). Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics, 95(1), 351–370.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). NBER.
Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473–480.
Chesbrough, H. C. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
CNS-ASU (2014). The Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Arizona State University. https://cns.asu.edu/ . Accessed 26 Dec 2014.
Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157–182.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.
Criscuolo, P., Salter, A., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2014). Going underground: Bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organization Science, 25(5), 1287–1305.
De Fraja, G. (1993). Strategic spillovers in patent races. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11(1), 139–146.
Eaton, B. C., & Eswaran, M. (2001). Know-how sharing with stochastic innovations. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2), 525–548.
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514.
Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21(5), 391–407.
Harhoff, D. (1996). Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development. Management Science, 42(6), 907–925.
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32(10), 1753–1769.
Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401–424.
Kay, L., Newman, N., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2014a). Patent overlay mapping: Visualizing technological distance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2432–2443.
Kay, L., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2014b). Signs of things to come? What patent submissions by small and medium-sized enterprises say about corporate strategies in emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 17–25.
Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. (1998). The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 255–264.
Lenoir, T., & Lécuyer, C. (1995). Instrument makers and discipline builders: The case of nuclear magnetic resonance. Perspectives on Science, 3, 276–345.
Lim, K. (2009). The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1249–1284.
Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. (2014). Positions and rewards: The allocation of resources within a science-based entrepreneurial firm. Research Policy, 43(7), 1134–1143.
Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York, NY: Lux Research.
McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.
Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434.
Mody, C. C. M. (2006). Corporations, universities, and instrumental communities: Commercializing probe microscopy, 1981–1996. Technology and Culture, 47(1), 56–80.
Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513–1527.
Mowery, D. C. (2011). Nanotechnology and the US national innovation system: Continuity and change. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(6), 697–711.
Muller, P., & Pénin, J. (2006). Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16(1–2), 85–108.
Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1389–1403.
Nelson, R. (1962). The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor. In: The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 549–584) New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2141.pdf . Accessed 26 Dec 2014.
Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.
PCAST (2005). The National Nanotechnology initiative at five years. Washington, DC: President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Executive Office of the President. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nni-five-years.pdf . Accessed 26 Dec 2014.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.
Rogers, J. D., Youtie, J., & Kay, L. (2012). Program-level assessment of research centers: Contribution of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers to US Nanotechnology National Initiative goals. Research Evaluation, 21(5), 368–380.
Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174.
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348.
Rubin, S. (2011). Do Not publish that article (if you care about patent rights in the United States). IEEE-USA today’s engineer. http://www.todaysengineer.org/2011/Dec/Patent-Law.asp . Accessed 25 Mar 2013.
Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years? Nature, 468, 627–628.
Shapira, P., Youtie, J., & Kay, L. (2011). National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(6), 587–604.
Simeth, M., & Raffo, J. D. (2013). What makes companies pursue an open science strategy? Research Policy, 42(9), 1531–1543.
Stephan, P. E., & Everhart, S. S. (1998). The changing rewards to science: The case of biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 10(2), 141–151.
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1996). Property rights and entrepreneurship in science. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 177–188.
STIP (2014). Georgia tech georgia tech program in science, technology and innovation policy. http://stip.gatech.edu/ . Accessed 26 Dec 2014.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104.
Verhees, F. J. H. M., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 134–154.
Von Hippel, E. (1987). Cooperation between rivals: Informal know how trading. Research Policy, 16, 291–302.
Von Hippel, E., & Finkelstein, S. N. (1979). Analysis of innovation in automated clinical chemistry analyzers. Science and Public Policy, 6(1), 24–37.
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2012). Partnering with universities: A good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? Small Business Economics, 38(2), 197–215.
Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 315–329.
Youtie, J., & Kay, L. (2014). Acquiring nanotechnology capabilities: Role of mergers and acquisitions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(5), 547–563.
Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., Boyack, K., Lobo, J., Klavans, R., Rafols, I., & Shapira, P. (2012). Using large-scale databases to understand the trajectories of emerging technologies. In H. Van Lente, C. Coenen, T. Fleischer, K. Konrad, L. Krabbenborg, C. Milburn, F. Thoreau, & T. Zülsdorf (Eds.), Little by little: Expansions of nanoscience and emerging technologies (pp. 55–58). Heidelberg: IOS Press.