Why contextualists cannot know they are right: Self-refuting implications of contextualism
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cohen, S. (1998): “Contextualist Solution to Epistemological Problems: Scepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76, 289–306.
DeRose, K. (1999): “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense”, in: J. Greco/E. Sosa (eds.): Epistemology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 187–205.
DeRose, K. (2000): “Now You Know It, Now You Don’t”, Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. V, Epistemology, 91–106.
Engel, M. Jr. (2004): “What’s Wrong With Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox”, Erkenntnis 61, 203–231.
Ernst, G. (2004): “In Defense of Indexicalism. A Commentary on “Are Knowledge Claims Indexical?” by Wayne Davis”, Erkenntnis 61, 283–293.
Hume, D. (1978): A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nozick, R. (1981): Philosophical Explanations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. (2002): “Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 64, 19–55.
Schiffer, S. (1996): “Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism”, Aristotelian Society Proceedings 96, 317–33.
Williams, M. (2001a): “Contextualism, Externalism, and Epistemic Standards”, Philosophical Studies 103, 1–23.
Williams, M. (2001b): Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.