Why People “Don’t Trust the Evidence”
Tóm tắt
In this commentary, we embed the volume’s contributions on public beliefs about science in a broader theoretical discussion of motivated political reasoning. The studies presented in the preceding section of the volume consistently find evidence for hyperskepticism toward scientific evidence among ideologues, no matter the domain or context—and this skepticism seems to be stronger among conservatives than liberals. Here, we show that these patterns can be understood as part of a general tendency among individuals to defend their prior attitudes and actively challenge attitudinally incongruent arguments, a tendency that appears to be evident among liberals and conservatives alike. We integrate the empirical results reported in this volume into a broader theoretical discussion of the John Q. Public model of information processing and motivated reasoning, which posits that both affective and cognitive reactions to events are triggered unconsciously. We find that the work in this volume is largely consistent with our theories of affect-driven motivated reasoning and biased attitude formation.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ajzen Icek, 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
Bargh John A., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 361
Converse Philip E., 1964, Ideology and discontent, 206
Damasio Antonio, 1994, Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain
Kruglanski Arie W., 2004, Psychology of closed-mindedness
Olson Michael A., 2009, Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, 86, 19
Talhelm Thomas, Haidt Jonathan, Oishi Shigehiro, Zhang Xuemin, Miao Felicity, Chen Shimin. 2012. Liberals think more analytically (more “weird”) than conservatives. Social Science Research Network Working Paper. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2111700.
Thagard Paul, 1998, Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior, 3
Vertzberger Yaacov, 1990, The world in their minds: Information processing, cognition, and perception in foreign policy decision-making
Young Everett H. 2009. Why we’re liberal, why we’re conservative: A cognitive theory on the origins of ideological thinking. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook.