Whose transformation is this? Unpacking the ‘apparatus of capture’ in Sweden's bioeconomy

Ahlqvist, 2019, Contradictions of spatial governance: bioeconomy and the management of state space in Finland, Antipode, 51, 395, 10.1111/anti.12498 Albrecht, 2021, Regional bioeconomies: public finance and sustainable policy narratives, Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr., 103, 116, 10.1080/04353684.2021.1921603 Appelstrand, 2007 Bacchi, 2016 Bauer, 2018, Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy: conflict, consensus or confusion?, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 28, 96, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.005 Bennich, 2018, The bio-based economy: dynamics governing transition pathways in the swedish forestry sector, Sustainability, 10, 976, 10.3390/su10040976 Bill. 2019 /20:65. A coherent policy for the climate. Retrieved from https://www.regeringen.se/4afbe4/contentassets/61f93d2abb184289a0c81c75395207b6/en-samlad-politik-for-klimatet–klimatpolitisk-handlingsplan-prop.-20192065. Biofuel Region. (2020). Swedish regions for a bioeconomy. Retrieved from https://biofuelregion.se/en/projekt/bioekonomi-regioner-i-samverkan/. Bixler, 2016, Network governance for large-scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture, Front. Ecol. Environ., 14, 165, 10.1002/fee.1252 Bjärstig, 2019, A struggling collaborative process – revisiting the woodland key habitat concept in Swedish forests, Scand. J. For. Res., 1 Borg, 2015, Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in central Finland, For. Policy Econ., 50, 90, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.008 Borgatti, 2009, Network analysis in the social sciences, Science, 323, 892, 10.1126/science.1165821 Bugge, 2016, What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature, Sustainability, 8, 691, 10.3390/su8070691 Böcher, 2020, Research trends: bioeconomy politics and governance, For. Policy Econ., 118, 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102219 D'Amato, 2017, Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues, J. Clean. Prod., 168, 716, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053 2017, 11 regions come together for a fossil-free Sweden, Dagens Industri Doezema, 2017, Technologies of governance: science, state and citizen in visions of the bioeconomy, 49 Felton, 2020, Keeping pace with forestry: multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix, Ambio, 49, 1050, 10.1007/s13280-019-01248-0 Fischer, 2020, Swedish forests in the bioeconomy: stories from the national forest program, Soc. Nat. Resour., 33, 896, 10.1080/08941920.2020.1725202 Freeman, 1977, A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness, Sociometry, 40, 35, 10.2307/3033543 Giurca, 2020, Unpacking the network discourse: actors and storylines in Germany's wood-based bioeconomy, For. Policy Econ., 110, 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.009 González, 2020, The potential of Amazon indigenous agroforestry practices and ontologies for rethinking global forest governance, For. Policy Econ., 118, 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102257 Grundel, 2016, A quadruple and quintuple helix approach to regional innovation systems in the transformation to a forestry-based bioeconomy, J. Knowl. Econ., 7, 963, 10.1007/s13132-016-0411-7 Hodge, 2017, Forests in a bioeconomy: bridge, boundary or divide?, Scand. J. For. Res., 32, 582, 10.1080/02827581.2017.1315833 Holmgren, 2020, Bioeconomy imaginaries: a review of forest-related social science literature, Ambio, 49, 1860, 10.1007/s13280-020-01398-6 IVA (Producer). (2020, 2020-11-02). The forest industry's opportunities to contribute to a growing Swedish bioeconomy. Retrieved from https://www.iva.se/event/skogsnaringens-mojligheter-att-bidra-till-en-vaxande-svensk-bioekonomi/. Jessop, 2009, From governance to governance failure and from multi-level governance to multi-scalar meta-governance, 79 Johansson, 2018, Collaborative governance for sustainable forestry in the emerging bio-based economy in Europe, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 32, 9, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.009 Jolly, 2020, Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis, Geoforum, 111, 176, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013 Kleinschmit, D., Arts, B., Giurca, A., Mustalahti, I., Sergent, A., & Pülzl, H. (2017). Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses (Vol. 19). Korhonen, 2018, Actors and politics in finland's forest-based bioeconomy network, Sustainability, 10, 3785, 10.3390/su10103785 Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2016). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: a pathway to sustainability?. KSLA. (2018). Forests and the climate. Manage for maximum wood productn or leave the forest as a carbon sink? Retrieved from https://www.ksla.se/publikationer/kslat/kslat-6-2018/. KSLA. (2020). Climate and land use by 2030. Retrieved from https://www.ksla.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/KSLAT-4-2020-Klimat-och-markanv%C3%A4ndning-mot-2030.pdf. KSLA. (2021). The academy mission. Kuckertz, 2020, Entrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 37, 332, 10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.003 Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 LandSkogsbruk. (2019, 29 July). The forest works like a vacuum cleaner. LandSkogsbruk. Retrieved from https://www.landskogsbruk.se/skog/skogen-fungerar-som-en-dammsugare/. Leipold, 2021, Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’ or perpetuating it? The circular economy as EU environmental policy narrative, Environ. Polit., 1 Leipold, 2017, Discursive agency: (Re-)conceptualizing actors and practices in the analysis of discursive policymaking, Policy Stud. J., 45, 510, 10.1111/psj.12172 Lovrić, 2020, Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe, For. Policy Econ., 110, 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.019 LRF. (2016, 2016-11-16). Sweden's trees are climate heroes!. Retrieved from https://www.lrf.se/politikochpaverkan/aganderatt-och-miljo/aganderattsfragor/det-goda-agandet/sveriges-skogar-tar-upp-83-procent-av-sveriges-totala-utslapp-av-koldioxid/. LRF. (2019, 2019-05-15). New stakes in Brussels will strengthen Sweden's forest owners. Retrieved from https://www.lrf.se/mitt-lrf/nyheter/riks/2019/05/ny-satsning-i-bryssel-ska-starka-sveriges-skogsagare/. LRF. (2020a, 2018-04-11). All facts about good ownership. Retrieved from https://www.lrf.se/politikochpaverkan/aganderatt-och-miljo/aganderattsfragor/det-goda-agandet/fragor-och-svar-om-aganderatten/. LRF. (2020b, 2018-04-25). MEP: i have never experienced such support for forests and property rights as now. Retrieved from https://www.lrf.se/mitt-lrf/nyheter/riks/2018/04/eu-parlamentarikern-jag-har-aldrig-upplevt-sant-stod-for-skog-och-aganderatt-i-eu-som-nu/. LRF. (2021, 2018-05-24). The government's decision on key biotopes is unacceptable to Sweden's forest owners. Retrieved from https://www.lrf.se/mitt-lrf/nyheter/riks/2018/05/regeringens-beslut-om-nyckelbiotoper-ar-oacceptabelt-for-sveriges-skogsagare/. Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. (2018). Sweden's national forest programme. Fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.government.se/48f05c/contentassets/859bb18d50494ec9b5b988a28ef99ae8/fact-sheet-swedens-national-forest-programme. Mustalahti, 2018, The responsive bioeconomy: the need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 3781, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132 NAO. (2020). Innovation through collaboration - the state's investments in strategic collaboration and innovation programs. Retrieved from https://www.riksrevisionen.se/download/18.4bd11d5f170e24de06140dd/1584360531371/RiR%202020_06%20Anpassad.pdf. Nilsson, J.E. R.f.h.w.v.s.g.m.v.d.v.-.-e.-i.-p.-i.-t.-m.-t.p. (2016). Vinnväxt - an innovative program in step with the times. Retrieved from https://www.vinnova.se/globalassets/mikrosajter/vinnvaxt/dokument/vinnvaxt-.-ett-innovativt-program-i-takt-med-tiden.pdf. Nordic Council of Ministers. (2018). Nordic bioeconomy programme: 15 action points for sustainable change. Retrieved from http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1222743&dswid=-8306. Näyhä, 2012, Diffusion of forest biorefineries in scandinavia and North America, Technol. For. Soc. Chang., 79, 1111, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.006 Patterson, 2017, Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 24, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001 Pavone, V., & Goven, J. (2017). Bioeconomies: life, technologies and capital in the XXI century (pp. 350). 10.1007/978-3-319-55651-2. 2018, Drumming the barrels of hope? Bioeconomy narratives in the media, Sustainability, 10, 4278, 10.3390/su10114278 Pfau, 2014, Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research, Sustainability, 6, 1222, 10.3390/su6031222 Ramcilovik-Suominen, 2016, Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?, J. Clean. Prod., 172 Region Västerbotten. (2019). First in the world with regional statistics for bioeconomy [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/regionvasterbotten/pressreleases/foerst-i-vaerlden-med-regional-statistik-foer-bioekonomi-2830024. Sanz-Hernández, 2020, Forest bioeconomy in the media discourse in Spain, Ambio, 49, 1897, 10.1007/s13280-020-01390-0 Sergent, 2018, Governance arrangements in the European forest sector: shifts towards ‘new governance’ or maintenance of state authority?, Land Use Policy, 79, 968, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.036 SFIF. (2019, 2019-10-03). The forest industries are now permanently on site in Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.skogsindustrierna.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2019/10/nu-ar-skogsindustrierna-pa-plats-permanent-i-bryssel/. SKR. (2021). Swedish regional office in Brussels. Retrieved from https://skr.se/demokratiledningstyrning/euinternationellt/svenskaregionkontorbryssel.3569.html. Sotirov, 2018, Integrated forest governance in Europe: an introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management, Land Policy, 79 SOU2020:4. (2020). The road to a climate-positive future. Retrieved from. Sténs, 2020, Forest property rights under attack”: actors, networks and claims about forest ownership in the Swedish press 2014–2017, For. Policy Econ., 111, 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102038 SvD. (2020). See the whole picture - not just the felled trees, debate article. Svenska Dagbladet. Retrieved fromhttps://www.svd.se/se-helheten–inte-bara-de-avverkade-traden. Swedish Forests. (2020). About Svenska Skogen. Retrieved from https://www.svenskaskogen.nu/#om-svenska-skogen. Södra. (2021). Business policy - new threats against property rights. Retrieved from https://www.sodra.com/sv/se/skog-medlem/naringspolitik/. Sörlin, S. (1981). Natur och kultur: om skogen och fosterlandet i det industriella genombrottets Sverige. The January agreement. (2019). Draft agreement between the social democrats, the center party, the liberals and the green party. Retrieved from https://www.centerpartiet.se/download/18.7cb2d720169e39ebc8f28b2/1554992070288/Januariavtalet.pdf. Timonen, 2010, Woodland key habitats in northern Europe: concepts, inventory and protection, Scand. J. For. Res., 25, 309, 10.1080/02827581.2010.497160 Vivien, 2019, The hijacking of the bioeconomy, Ecol. Econ., 159, 189, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027 Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Westin, 2019 Hausknost, 2017, A transition to which bioeconomy? An exploration of diverging techno-political choices, Sustainability, 9, 669, 10.3390/su9040669