Whose call is it? Targeting universal service programs to low-income households’ telecommunications preferences

Telecommunications Policy - Tập 33 Số 3-4 - Trang 129-145 - 2009
Janice Alane Hauge1, Eric P. Chiang2, Mark A Jamison3
1Department of Economics, University of North Texas, TX, USA
2Department of Economics, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA
3Public Utility Research Center (PURC), University of Florida, PO Box 117142, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrade, 2002, The economics of welfare participation and welfare stigma: A review, Public Finance and Management, 2, 294

Brown, J. (2006a). Disconnecting from communications: A survey of Floridians who qualify for Lifeline and dropped their telephone service. University of Florida, Department of Telecommunication, PURC Working Paper.

Brown, J. (2006b). Perspectives on communications services and Lifeline: Results of a telephone survey of Florida households. University of Florida, Department of Telecommunication, PURC Working Paper.

Brown, J. (2006c). Understanding participation in telecommunications Lifeline programs: A survey of low-income households in Florida. University of Florida, Department of Telecommunication, PURC Working Paper.

Brown, J., & Jamison, M.A. (2005). Motivations behind low-income households’ bypass of support for universal service. University of Florida, Department of Economics, PURC Working Paper.

Burton, 2007, Understanding participation in social programs: Why don’t households pick up the Lifeline?, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7, 1, 10.2202/1935-1682.1583

Center for Policy Research on Science and Technology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver. (2006). Privacy rights and prepaid communications services: A survey of prepaid mobile phone regulation and registration policies among OECD member states.

Currie, J. (2004). The take up of social benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10488, Cambridge, MA.

Florida Public Service Commission. (2007). Report to the Governor, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives: Link-Up Florida and Lifeline Assistance Report.

Garbacz, 1997, Assessing the impact of FCC Lifeline and Link-up programs on telephone penetration, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 11, 67, 10.1023/A:1007902329324

Garbacz, 2002, Estimating telephone demand with state decennial Census data from 1970 to 1990, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21, 317, 10.1023/A:1015316632742

Garbacz, 2003, Estimating telephone demand with state decennial census data from 1970 to 1990: Update with 2000 data, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 24, 373, 10.1023/A:1025611124735

GSM Association. (2006). Universal access: How mobile can bring communications to all.

Hauge, J. A., & Jamison, M. A. (Forthcoming). Effects of using specific versus general data in social program research. Applied Economics.

Hauge, 2007, Participation in social programs by consumers and companies: A nationwide analysis of participation rates for telephone Lifeline programs, Public Finance Review, 35, 606, 10.1177/1091142106299019

Hauge, 2008, Leaving money on the table: Discounting telephone prices via Florida's Lifeline program, Information Economics and Policy, 2, 135, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.12.002

Holt, L., & Jamison, M.A. (2006). Making telephone service affordable for low-income households: An analysis of Lifeline and Link-up telephone programs in Florida. University of Florida, Department of Economics, PURC Working Paper.

Holt, 2007, Re-evaluating FCC policies concerning the Lifeline and Link-up programs, Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5, 393

Hox, 1994, A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys, Quality and Quantity, 28, 329, 10.1007/BF01097014

Moffitt, 1983, An economic model of welfare stigma, American Economic Review, 73, 1023

Pew Research Center. (2008). Ways of coping with a growing population segment: The impact of “cell-onlys” on public opinion polling.

Rodini, 2003, Going mobile: Substitutability between fixed and mobile access, Telecommunications Policy, 27, 457, 10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00010-7

Rosston, 2000, The ‘state’ of universal service, Information Economics and Policy, 12, 261, 10.1016/S0167-6245(00)00011-1

Sullivan, N. P. (2008). Cell phones provide significant economic gains for low-income American households: A review of literature and data from two new surveys. Available at: 〈http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/archive/Sullivan_Report_032608.pdf〉.

Valletti, 2002, Universal service and entry: The role of uniform pricing and coverage constraints, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21, 169, 10.1023/A:1014387707275

Williamson, A. (2006). A count of the number of households in Florida that qualify for Lifeline telephone discounts, 2000–2005. University of Florida, Department of Economics, PURC Working Paper.