Who should you vote for? Empirical evidence from Portuguese local governments
Tóm tắt
The economic literature considers voters quasi-rational agents that care about maximizing their individual welfare when deciding on who to vote for. Voters believe that, once a politician is elected, his or her characteristics will affect policy outcomes and consequently their private welfare. To assess whether mayors’ characteristics influence municipalities’ financial performance, I use a dataset composed of 278 Portuguese mainland municipalities from 2003 to 2016. I find that mayors’ age, education, occupation, and tenure influence the level of public investment, tax revenues, debt, and budget balances. Although most of the Portuguese voters only consider candidates’ political affiliation when deciding on who to vote for, my estimates do not show any significant impact of this characteristic on the financial indicators analyzed. Therefore, these results question the way Portuguese vote by arguing that, when voting for local government representatives, they should care about other characteristics among candidates besides their political affiliation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aidt TS, Veiga FJ, Veiga LG (2011) Election results and opportunistic policies: a new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice 148 (1):21–44
Alesina AF, Troiano U, Cassidy T (2015) Old and young politicians. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research
Almeida MAP (2013) O Poder Local do Estado Novo à Democracia: Presidentes de câmara e governadores civis, 1936–2012. Leya
Aragón FM, Pique R (2015) Does politician’s experience matter? Evidence from peruvian local governments. Working Paper
Baleiras RN, Santos V (2000) Behavioral and institutional determinants of political business cycles. Public Choice 104(1):121–147
Besley T, Reynal-Querol M (2011) Do democracies select more educated leaders? Am Polit Sci Rev 105(03):552–566
Besley T, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M (2011) Do educated leaders matter? Econ J 121(554):205–227
Bourdain JAM (2008) Voto Estratégico em portugal: nas eleições legislativas de 2005. PhD thesis, Universidade de Lisboa
Bouvet F, Dall’Erba S (2010) European regional structural funds: how large is the influence of politics on the allocation process? JCMS: J Common Mark Stud 48 (3):501–528
Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J Bus Econ Stat 29(2):238–249
Casaburi L, Troiano U (2015) Ghost-house busters: the electoral response to a large anti–tax evasion program. Q J Econ 131(1):273–314
Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E (2004) Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72(5):1409–1443
Congleton RD, Zhang Y (2013) Is it all about competence? The human capital of us presidents and economic performance. Constit Polit Econ 24(2):108–124
De Hoyos RE, Sarafidis V (2006) Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata J 6(4):482
Denney NW, Palmer AM (1981) Adult age differences on traditional and practical problem-solving measures. J Gerontol 36(3):323–328
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560
Dur R, Staal K (2008) Local public good provision, municipal consolidation, and national transfers. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38(2):160–173
Ferreira F, Gyourko J (2009) Do political parties matter? evidence from us cities. Q J Econ 124(1):399–422
Ferreira F, Gyourko J (2014) Does gender matter for political leadership? The case of us mayors. J Public Econ 112:24–39
Fiva JH, Folke O, Sørensen RJ (2016) The power of parties: evidence from close municipal elections in norway. Scand J Econ
Foucault M, Madies T, Paty S (2008) Public spending interactions and local politics. empirical evidence from french municipalities. Public Choice 137(1-2):57
Freier R, Thomasius S (2016) Voters prefer more qualified mayors, but does it matter for public finances? Evidence for germany. Int Tax Public Financ 23(5):875–910
Gagliarducci S, Paserman MD (2011) Gender interactions within hierarchies: evidence from the political arena. Rev Econ Stud p rdr046
Glass DP (1985) Evaluating presidential candidates: who focuses on their personal attributes? Public Opin Q 49(4):517–534
Hoechle D (2007) Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J 7(3):281
Jones BF, Olken BA (2005) Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since world war ii. Q J Econ 120(3):835–864
Lodge M, Steenbergen MR, Brau S (1995) The responsive voter: campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(02):309–326
Lopes MC, Peralta S (2016) I like the way you move: tax competition in portuguese municipal corporate income tax. Working Paper
Martins P, Correia L (2015) Determinantes dos desvios orçamentais nos municípios portugueses. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais (39)
McDermott ML (2005) Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. J Polit 67(1):201–219
Migueis M (2012) Local government fiscal policies: left-wing vs. Right-wing portuguese municipalities. Working Paper
Monacelli D, Pazienza MG, Rapallini C (2016) Municipality budget rules and debt: is the italian regulation effective? Public Budg Financ 36(3):114–140
Müller A, Storesletten K, Zilibotti F (2016) The political color of fiscal responsibility. J Eur Econ Assoc 14(1):252–302
OECD (2018) Subnational governments in oecd countries: key data. OECD report
Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22(1):435–480
Pettersson-Lidbom P (2008) Do parties matter for economic outcomes? A regression-discontinuity approach. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(5):1037–1056
Popkin SL (1994) The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Porto A, Porto N (2000) Fiscal decentralization and voters’choices as control. J Appl Econ 3(1)
Ribeiro NA, Jorge S (2015) Political-ideological circumstances and local authorities’ debt: evidence from portuguese municipalities. Contrib Econ 9(02):155–170
Rogers T, Fox CR, Gerber A, Shafir E (2013) Rethinking why people vote. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy 91
Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev Econ Stat: 387–389
Schuknecht L (2000) Fiscal policy cycles and public expenditure in developing countries. Public Choice 102(1):113–128
Shafir E (2013) The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Thompson SB (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J Financ Econ 99(1):1–10
Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424
Veiga LG, Pinho MM (2007) O poder local e a europa. Portugal: 20 Anos de Integração Europeia
Veiga LG, Veiga FJ (2005) Eleitoralismo nos municípios portugueses. Análise Social 40(177):865–889
Veiga LG, Veiga FJ (2007) Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice 131(1):45–64
Veiga LG, Veiga FJ (2014) Determinants of portuguese local governments’ indebtedness. NIPE Working Papers Series (16):1–32
Veiga LG, Veiga FJ (2019) The effects of electoral incentives on fiscal policy: evidence from a legislative change at the local government level. J Law Econ Org 35