Who learns what in sustainability transitions?

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions - Tập 34 - Trang 311-321 - 2020
Nihit Goyal1,2, Michael Howlett3
1Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore
2The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies, Yale University, United States
3Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, 1992, The emergence of cooperation: national epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control, Int. Organ., 46, 101, 10.1017/S0020818300001466 Adler, 1992, Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program, Int. Organ., 46, 367, 10.1017/S0020818300001533 Amelung, 2017, Making citizen panels a ‘universal Bestseller’, 189 Bakker, 2014, Stakeholders interests, expectations, and strategies regarding the development and implementation of electric vehicles: the case of the netherlands, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 66, 52, 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.018 Beers, 2014, Social learning inside and outside transition projects: playing free jazz for a heavy metal audience, NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci., 69, 5, 10.1016/j.njas.2013.10.001 Beers, 2017, Reflexivity and learning in system innovation processes, Sociol. Ruralis, 57, 415, 10.1111/soru.12179 Beers, 2016, Toward an integrative perspective on social learning in system innovation initiatives, Ecol. Soc., 21 Béland, 2016, How solutions chase problems: instrument constituencies in the policy process, Governance, 29, 393, 10.1111/gove.12179 Béland, 2018, Instrument constituencies and public policy-making: an introduction, Policy Soc., 37, 1, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1375249 Bennett, 1992, The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change, Policy Sci., 25, 275, 10.1007/BF00138786 Boon, 2016, Learning to shield – policy learning in socio-technical transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 18, 181, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.003 Borghei, 2018, Niche aggregation through cumulative learning: a multiple case study of electric bus projects, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.004 Bos, 2012, Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 1340, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006 Bos, 2013, A design framework for creating social learning situations, Global Environ. Change, 23, 398, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003 Bosman, 2014, Discursive regime dynamics in the dutch energy transition, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 13, 45, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003 Brown, 2003, Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 15, 291, 10.1080/09537320310001601496 Brown, 2008, Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: the case of a zero-energy residential building, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 75, 107, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.014 Budde, 2012, Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 1072, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.012 Buehler, 2018, Verkehrsverbund: the evolution and spread of fully integrated regional public transport in germany, austria, and switzerland, Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 1 Cashore, 2007, Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in pacific northwest forestry, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 51, 532, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x Cramer, 2004, Governance through learning: making corporate social responsibility in dutch industry effective from a sustainable development perspective, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 6, 271, 10.1080/1523908042000344041 Cuppen, 2019, Normative diversity, conflict and transition: shale gas in the netherlands, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 145, 165, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.004 Davies, 2012, Future visioning for sustainable household practices: spaces for sustainability learning?, Area, 44, 54, 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01054.x Domènech, 2015, Learning processes during regime shifts: empirical evidence from the diffusion of greywater recycling in spain, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 15, 26, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.01.001 Dunlop, 2013, Systematising policy learning: from monolith to dimensions, Polit. Stud., 61, 599, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x Dunlop, 2017, Learning in the bath-tub: the micro and macro dimensions of the causal relationship between learning and policy change, Policy Soc., 36, 304, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1321232 Duygan, 2018, Discourse coalitions in swiss waste management: gridlock or winds of change?, Waste Manag., 72, 25, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.006 Elzen, 2004 Elzen, 2012, Anchoring of innovations: assessing dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 5, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006 Elzen, 2005, Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 72, 651, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.04.002 Farla, 2012, Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 991, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001 Feindt, 2018, Reflexive governance: exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Introduction to the special issue, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 20, 661, 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1532562 Foli, 2018, How instrument constituencies shape policy transfer: a case study from ghana, Policy Soc., 37, 108, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1377987 Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Res. Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010 Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Res. Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, 2005, The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930), Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 17, 445, 10.1080/09537320500357319 Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 Geels, 2012, A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, J. Transp. Geogr., 24, 471, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021 Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Geels, 2011, Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: a cultural-performative perspective and a case study of dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986), Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 78, 910, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.004 Gough, 2001, The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and ngos, Int. Aff., 77, 329, 10.1111/1468-2346.00195 Goyal, 2018, Framework or metaphor? Analysing the status of policy learning in the policy sciences, J. Asian Public Policy, 1 Goyal, 2018, Lessons learned and not learned: bibliometric analysis of policy learning, 27 Goyal, 2018, Technology and instrument constituencies as agents of innovation: sustainability transitions and the governance of urban transport, Energies, 11, 1198, 10.3390/en11051198 Goyal, 2019, Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in gujarat, india, Public Adm. Dev. Grin, 2006, 201 Haas, 1992, Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, Int. Organ., 46, 1, 10.1017/S0020818300001442 Halbe, 2016 Halbe, 2019, A methodological framework to initiate and design transition governance processes, Sustainability, 11, 844, 10.3390/su11030844 Hall, 1993, Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in britain, Comp. Polit., 25, 275, 10.2307/422246 Harborne, 2012, Commercialising new energy technologies: Failure of the japanese machine?, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 24, 497, 10.1080/09537325.2012.674671 Harborne, 2007, The development and diffusion of radical technological innovation: the role of bus demonstration projects in commercializing fuel cell technology, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 19, 167, 10.1080/09537320601168060 Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 Hoffmann, 2011 Hoogma, 2002 Hoppmann, 2014, Compulsive policy-making - the evolution of the german feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power, Res. Policy, 43, 1422, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.014 Howlett, 2012, The lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making, Int. Polit. Sci. Rev., 33, 539, 10.1177/0192512112453603 Howlett, 2009, The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: understanding policy change as a methodological problem, J. Comp. Policy Anal. Res. Pract., 11, 33, 10.1080/13876980802648144 Howlett, 2015, Streams and stages: reconciling kingdon and policy process theory, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 54, 419, 10.1111/1475-6765.12064 Howlett, 2017, Moving policy theory forward: connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis, Aust. J. Public Adm., 76, 65, 10.1111/1467-8500.12191 Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 Kivisaari, 2004, Managing Experiments for Transition. Examples of Societal Embedding in Energy and Health Care Sectors, Syst. Innov. Transit. Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, 223 Loorbach, 2010, Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework, Governance, 23, 161, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x Lovell, 2008, Discourse and innovation journeys: the case of low energy housing in the uk, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 20, 613, 10.1080/09537320802292883 Lundvall, 2010 Manders, 2018, Understanding smart mobility experiments in the dutch automobility system: who is involved and what do they promise?, Futures, 96, 90, 10.1016/j.futures.2017.12.003 Mann, 2015, Local emergence and international developments of conservation trading systems: innovation dynamics and related problems, Environ. Conserv., 42, 325, 10.1017/S0376892914000381 Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Markard, 2015, The technological innovation systems framework: response to six criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 16, 76, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.006 Markard, 2016, Socio-technical transitions and policy change - advocacy coalitions in swiss energy policy, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 18, 215, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003 Markard, 2008, Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 20, 443, 10.1080/09537320802141429 May, 1992, Policy learning and failure, J. Public Policy, 12, 331, 10.1017/S0143814X00005602 Maye, 2018, Examining innovation for sustainability from the bottom up: an analysis of the permaculture community in england, Sociol. Ruralis, 58, 331, 10.1111/soru.12141 Mccool, 1998, The subsystem family of concepts: a critique and a proposal, Polit. Res. Q., 51, 551, 10.1177/106591299805100213 Molina, 1995, Sociotechnical constituencies as processes of alignment: the rise of a large-scale European information technology initiative, Technol. Soc., 17, 385, 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00016-K Molina, 1998, Understanding the role of the technical in the build-up of sociotechnical constituencies, Technovation, 19, 1, 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00093-5 Mukherjee, 2015, Who is a stream? Epistemic communities, instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in public policy-making, Politics Gov., 3 Nair, 2016, Meaning and power in the design and development of policy experiments, Futures, 76, 67, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.02.008 Normann, 2017, Policy networks in energy transitions: the cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in norway, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 118, 80, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.004 Ornetzeder, 2013, Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations, Global Environ. Change, 23, 856, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007 Ortiz, 2018, The diffusion of sustainable family farming practices in colombia: an emerging sociotechnical niche?, Sustain. Sci., 13, 829, 10.1007/s11625-017-0493-6 Pahl-Wostl, 2009, A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes, Global Environ. Change, 19, 354, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 Pahl-Wostl, 2013, How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: a comparative case study analysis on flood management, Ecol. Soc., 18, 10.5751/ES-05779-180458 Peng, 2019, Scaling urban sustainability experiments: contextualization as an innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 227, 302, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.061 Perl, 2018, Does institutional entrenchment shape instrument adjustment? Assessing instrument constituency influences on american and australian motor fuel taxation, Policy Soc., 37, 90, 10.1080/14494035.2018.1402527 Ratinen, 2016, Alternative view on niche development: situated learning on policy communities, power and agency, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 28, 114, 10.1080/09537325.2015.1073251 Raven, 2007, Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: an assessment of differences and pitfalls, Energy Policy, 35, 2390, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003 Raven, 2016, Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 18, 164, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 Raven, 2006, Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the dutch electricity regime, Res. Policy, 35, 581, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.001 Richardson, 1979 Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 Rudd, 2015, Scientists’ framing of the ocean science–policy interface, Global Environ. Change, 33, 44, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.006 Sabatier, 1988, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein, Policy Sci., 21, 129, 10.1007/BF00136406 Safarzyńska, 2012, Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 41, 1011, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.014 Schäpke, 2017, Linking transitions to sustainability: a study of the societal effects of transition management, Sustainability, 9, 737, 10.3390/su9050737 Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 Schwanen, 2015, The bumpy road toward low-energy urban mobility: case studies from two uk cities, Sustainability, 7, 7086, 10.3390/su7067086 Seyfang, 2012, Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 30, 381, 10.1068/c10222 Seyfang, 2014, A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the uk, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 13, 21, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004 Simons, 2018, The concept of instrument constituencies: accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance, Policy Soc., 37, 14, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248 Simons, 2015, Politics by other means: the making of the emissions trading instrument as a ‘pre-history’of carbon trading, 51 Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 Sol, 2017, Reframing the future: the role of reflexivity in governance networks in sustainability transitions, Environ. Educ. Res., 1 Stanitsas, 2019, Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: a systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 208, 924, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157 Staudenmaier, 1985 Staudenmaier, 1989, The politics of successful technologies, 150 Subramanian, 2018, The role of knowledge base homogeneity in learning from strategic alliances, Res. Policy, 47, 158, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.005 Susur, 2019, A strategic niche management perspective on transitions to eco-industrial park development: a systematic review of case studies, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 140, 338, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.002 Udovyk, 2016, ‘I cannot be passive as i was before’: learning from grassroots innovations in ukraine, Eur. J. Res. Educ. Learn. Adults, 8, 225, 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9090 Ulbrich, 2019, The german permaculture community from a community of practice perspective, Sustainability, 11, 1241, 10.3390/su11051241 Ulmanen, 2009, Biofuel developments in sweden and the netherlands, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 13, 1406, 10.1016/j.rser.2008.10.001 Underdal, 2010, Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance, Global Environ. Change, 20, 386, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.005 Van De Kerkhof, 2005, Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 72, 733, 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.002 Van De Ven, 1999 Van Mierlo, 2018, Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: a review, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. Van Mierlo, 2010, Learning towards system innovation: evaluating a systemic instrument, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 77, 318, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.004 Van Poeck, 2018, Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. van Waarden, 1992, Dimensions and types of policy networks, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 21, 29, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00287.x Vasseur, 2013, A comparative analysis of photovoltaic technological innovation systems including international dimensions: the cases of japan and the netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 200, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.017 Vinke-De Kruijf, 2016, A multi-level perspective on learning about climate change adaptation through international cooperation, Environ. Sci. Policy, 66, 242, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.004 Von Malmborg, 2007, Stimulating learning and innovation in networks for regional sustainable development: the role of local authorities, J. Clean. Prod., 15, 1730, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.014 Voß, 2007 Voß, 2007, Innovation processes in governance: the development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument, Sci. Public Policy, 34, 329, 10.3152/030234207X228584 Voß, 2014, Performative policy studies: realizing “transition management”, Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res., 27, 317, 10.1080/13511610.2014.967666 Voß, 2016, Innovating public participation methods: technoscientization and reflexive engagement, Soc. Stud. Sci., 46, 749, 10.1177/0306312716641350 Voß, 2014, Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: the social life of emissions trading, Env. Polit., 23, 735, 10.1080/09644016.2014.923625 Weible, 2009, Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Stud. J., 37, 121, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x Weible, 2018, Instrument constituencies and the advocacy coalition framework: an essay on the comparisons, opportunities, and intersections, Policy Soc., 37, 59, 10.1080/14494035.2018.1417705 Zito, 2001, Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and european integration, J. Eur. Public Policy, 8, 585, 10.1080/13501760110064401 Zito, 2018, Instrument constituencies and epistemic community theory, Policy Soc., 37, 36, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1416929