When is predator’s opportunism remunerative?

József Garay1, Tamás F. Móri2
1Research Group of Theoretical Biology and Ecology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, L. Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary
2Department of Probability Theory and Statistics, L. Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson J.J., 2010, Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimal foraging in patches, Am. Nat., 175, 240, 10.1086/649606

Abrams P., 1998, Apparent competition or apparent mutualism? Shared predation when populations cycle, Ecology, 78, 201, 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0201:ACOAMS]2.0.CO;2

Berec L., 1999, Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging, Bull. Math. Biol., 1, 1

Berec L., 2000, A mechanistic model for partial preference, Theor. Pop. Biol., 58, 279, 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1491

Bélisle C., 1997, The effects of limited memory capacity on foraging behavior, Theor. Pop. Biol., 52, 78, 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1319

Charnov E.L., 1976, Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem, Theor. Pop. Biol., 9, 129, 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-X

Cressman R., 2003, Evolutionary stability in Lotka-Volterra system, J. Theor. Biol., 222, 233, 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00032-8

Cressman, R., and Garay J. 2010. The effect of opportunistic and intentional predators on herding behaviour of prey. <i>Ecology</i>, accepted.

Hayward M.A., 2005, Prey preference of the lions (Panthera leo), J. Zool. Lond., 267, 309, 10.1017/S0952836905007508

Hebblewhite M., 2002, Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves, Can. J. Zool., 80, 800, 10.1139/z02-059

Holling C.S., 1959, The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, Can. Entomol., 91, 293, 10.4039/Ent91293-5

Huggard D.J., 1993, Prey selectivity of wolves in Banff National Park. I. Prey species, Can. J. Zool., 71, 130, 10.1139/z93-019

Huggard D.J., 1993, Prey selectivity of wolfs in Banff National Park. II: Age, sex and condition of elk, Can. J. Zool., 71, 140, 10.1139/z93-020

Jeschke J.M., 2002, Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey, Ecol. Monog., 72, 95, 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:PFRDBH]2.0.CO;2

Krivan V., 2003, Competitive co-existence caused by adaptive predators, Evol. Ecol. Res., 5, 1163

Kunkel K.E., 2004, Factors correlated with foraging behaviour of wolves in and near Glacier National Park, Montana, J. Wildl. Manage, 68, 167, 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0167:FCWFBO]2.0.CO;2

Lankford T.E., 1997, Selective predation by juvenile weakfish: Post-consumptive constraints on energy maximization and growth, Ecology, 78, 1049, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1049:SPBJWP]2.0.CO;2

Marten G.G., 1972, An optimization equation for predation, Ecology, 54, 92, 10.2307/1934377

McNamara J.M., 1987, Partial preference and foraging, Anim. Behav., 35, 1084, 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80166-5

Nachman G., 2006, A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patch habitat, J. Anim. Ecol., 75, 948, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01114.x

O’Donoghue M., 1997, Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle, Oikos, 80, 150, 10.2307/3546526

O’Donoghue M., 1998, Behaviour responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle, Oikos, 82, 169, 10.2307/3546927

O’Donoghue M., 1998, Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle, Ecology, 79, 1193, 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1193:FROCAL]2.0.CO;2

Prugh L.R., 2005, Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply, Oikos, 110, 253, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13478.x

Schaller G.B., 1972, The Serengeti Lion

Stephans D.W., 1986, Foraging theory. Monographs in Behaviour and Ecology

Tschanz B., 2007, Functional responses: A question of alternative prey and predator density, Ecology, 88, 1300, 10.1890/06-1512