When is ‘Urgent’ Really Urgent and Does it Matter? Misclassification of Procedural Status and Implications for Risk Assessment in Cardiac Surgery

Reid, 2009, An Australian risk prediction model for 30-day mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass: The AusSCORE, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 138, 904, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.020 Billah, 2010, A preoperative risk prediction model for 30-day mortality following cardiac surgery in an Australian cohort, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 37, 1086, 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.021 Ariyaratne, 2011, An Australian risk prediction model for determining early mortality following aortic valve replacement, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg., 39, 815, 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.060 Billah, 2008, Preoperative Risk Prediction Model for 30-day Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery in Australia, Heart, Lung and Circ, 17 Suppl 3, S67, 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.05.155 ANZSCTS National Cardiac Surgery Database Program. Data Definitions Manual. 2008. Version 3. Reid, 2004, Initial Twelve Months Experience and Analysis for 2001–2002 from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons, Victorian Database Project, Heart, Lung and Circ, 13, 291, 10.1016/j.hlc.2004.05.006 Dinh DT, Tran L, Chand V, Ariyaratne T, Newcomb A, Billah B, et al. ASCTS Cardiac Surgery Database. Public report 2009–2010, VIC. Available at http://www.anzscts.org/uploads/39136/ufiles/VIC_Public_report_2009-10.pdf. Accessed on 12 jan 2015 Bland, 1986, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 327, 307, 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software, version 9.2 [computer software]. College Stat. MedCalc. MedCalc Software, version 13.3 [computer software]. MedCalc Software bvba, Acacialaan 22, Ostend, Belgium; 2014. STS National Database Program. Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Training Manual, v2.73 available at the http://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/documents/Training Manual Update 2012.pdf accessed on 1 Jan 2015. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2008, National health data dictionary, Version 14, available on the web, accessed on 12 Jan 2015. Hadorn, 1997, The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery, BMJ., 314, 135, 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135 Kee, 1998, Urgency and priority for cardiac surgery: a clinical judgment analysis, BMJ., 316, 925, 10.1136/bmj.316.7135.925 Nashef, 1999, European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg., 16, 9, 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00134-7 Shahian, 2009, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1–coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, Ann Thorac Surg., 88, S2, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053 Moons, 2012, Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment, Heart, 98, 691, 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301247 D’Agostino, 2001, Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation, JAMA., 11, 180, 10.1001/jama.286.2.180 Cook, 2007, Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction, Circ., 20, 928, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402 Department of Health, Victoria. A framework for emergency surgery in Victorian public health services Available at http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/A-framework-for-emergency-surgery-in-Victorian-public-health-services. accessed on 21 Oct 2014